Go back
70% of SNAP recipients have full time jobs

70% of SNAP recipients have full time jobs

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

@AverageJoe1 said
I wasn't in the room when they hammered out the requirements, if you will. And there is a lot to be said about appearances, No1Marauder, with all due respects. You fellers would have bitched about the Pentagon in 1943 if Trump had been president. That statement makes you squirm, you know that you indeed would have.
Appearances? To show the world, the Netherlande ...[text shortened]... ll excited, or just mad as hell?

Remember, when you answer stuff we know if you are lying!!! 😉
So you are happy with WHATEVER POS Trump builds, even if it looks like a Mar A Lago WHOREHOUSE.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@AverageJoe1 said
I agree, sohouse. Tacky. Gold is laden in the Saudis castles, ....now, we do not want a castle do we? I guess Trump is not talented in some areas, but he is in the ones that count. What a negotiator.
Have you seen where he 'sets up' his counterparts with unreasonable premises only to flip them later. He simple know what he is doing. Leave him alone!!

I do ...[text shortened]... y. It is not one. And, we do not want you libs to say climate change is an emergency, now, do we.
Actually I heard a report on the radio on the way to voting, where only about 60 of the 180 or so nations have lived up to the Paris Accords ten years ago.
So you DAMN right climate change is happening RIGHT IN FRONT OF OUR FACES. So it looks like collective greed causes people to TOTALLY ignore accords and just burn coal or whatever, Trump goes DIG DIG DIG for COAL. Right, just what we need, more tonnage of crap dumped into the atmosphere.
So there WILL be a correction no matter WHAT humans do. But humans will DEFINITELY NOT LIKE THE RESULTS OF THEIR COLLECTIVE GREED.


@wildgrass said
It's not extra. It was there before. Republicans are the ones adding new spending.
An end to the enhanced subsidies will almost certainly cost Americans a lot more than $1.5 trillion over 10 years.

First, premiums are estimated to shoot up by more than a 100% absent remedial legislation. This will be a substantial economic cost to the working and middle class families that rely on the ACA.

Second, CBO estimates are that up to 14 million will forego health insurance because of this increase. The inevitable result of that will be a less healthy population leading to more sick days and increased medical and hospital costs.

So when right wingers complain about the costs of the subsidies, know that what they are really calling for is a poorer and less healthy working and middle class to partially fund a $4.5 trillion tax cut overwhelmingly favoring those with higher incomes.


@sonhouse said
So you are happy with WHATEVER POS Trump builds, even if it looks like a Mar A Lago WHOREHOUSE.
nononono. You are not paying attention, you must have Epstein on your mind.....what is the latest on that case BTW? I heard the UK prince is in trouble, I really am interested in that, and the Epstein Travel itineraries.

Anyway, I think Trump is edging towards gaudy crap...gold is for losers. Vegas casinos, ugh. I do like the whole idea, though. It will serve us well for 100s of years into the future. By then, I figure that the global landscape will be so different that they will thank Trump for his foresight. Sorry to disagree, and for being amazed that you and Marauder et al, the ole lock-step 2-step, want us to just do a tent. Or, you may want to design it yourself, and spend $300M of taxpayer dollars to build it,,,,just to spite Trump!!! ""We couldn't nail him for anything over 10 years, this is all we got left! No Ballroom!! No Ballroom!!""


@AverageJoe1 said
nononono. You are not paying attention, you must have Epstein on your mind.....what is the latest on that case BTW? I heard the UK prince is in trouble, I really am interested in that, and the Epstein Travel itineraries.

Anyway, I think Trump is edging towards gaudy crap...gold is for losers. Vegas casinos, ugh. I do like the whole idea, though. It will serve us well ...[text shortened]... ldn't nail him for anything over 10 years, this is all we got left! No Ballroom!! No Ballroom!!""
A MAJORITY of Americans polled about this monstrosity say NO WAY, we don't need a ballroom. AND we are DEEPLY OFFENDED tearing down the entire east wing besides.


@sonhouse said
Actually I heard a report on the radio on the way to voting, where only about 60 of the 180 or so nations have lived up to the Paris Accords ten years ago.
So you DAMN right climate change is happening RIGHT IN FRONT OF OUR FACES. So it looks like collective greed causes people to TOTALLY ignore accords and just burn coal or whatever, Trump goes DIG DIG DIG for COAL. Right, ...[text shortened]... no matter WHAT humans do. But humans will DEFINITELY NOT LIKE THE RESULTS OF THEIR COLLECTIVE GREED.
Bill Gates, who knows a dame site more than you do about the world view, says he was wrong, that Climate Change is no big deal. I didn't read this, as I know enough about it, but it should let you know that, just maaaaaaayyyyybbee, you are wrong again!!!!!

https://www.thefp.com/p/bill-gates-has-finally-admitted-that-climate-doomerism-mistake?https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thefp.com%2Fsubscribe=

Could you do some new topics? Maybe save one day,, like thursdays,.....for conspiracy theory day???


@sonhouse said
A MAJORITY of Americans polled about this monstrosity say NO WAY, we don't need a ballroom. AND we are DEEPLY OFFENDED tearing down the entire east wing besides.
Do those naysayers know enough to say such a thing? They have studied the particulars? Is there a sign on the wall to remind them in their quests to "STOP THE BALLROOM!!" that it will save us $300M.
How did they arrive at their conclusions, that the tent is fine and that we do not need to do a new ballroom for the world's appreciations?
Are there specific reasons??

C'mon sonhouse, be interesting. Draw a crowd to your position on the peach box in Times Square.


@wildgrass said
Of course the Bidens were full of it. Great we agree, not sure why you keep bringing it up.

Trump spends more 🤑💰💰💰💰. A lot more. We're already $300 billion above last year. Just a few months to go. They replaced federal expenditures for healthcare and food stamps with expenditures for national guard to cleanup trash in DC ($100/hour times thousands of troops for months o ...[text shortened]... the white house. Etc.

Wake up. They're spending MORE money now.

When are y'all going to get it
Check out this oblivious-to-economics liberal who does not take into consideration the amount of revenues due to Trump, the trillions in investments from all those countries who bowed in his economic presence. This will bring big bucks, catch the train, #47.

I made up a phrase that you got to spend money to make money, and my granny says, from her kitchen stove, you have to break eggs to make an omelette.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@AverageJoe1 said
Do those naysayers know enough to say such a thing? They have studied the particulars? Is there a sign on the wall to remind them in their quests to "STOP THE BALLROOM!!" that it will save us $300M.
How did they arrive at their conclusions, that the tent is fine and that we do not need to do a new ballroom for the world's appreciations?
Are there specific reaso ...[text shortened]...

C'mon sonhouse, be interesting. Draw a crowd to your position on the peach box in Times Square.
What we need a WHOLE lot more is a POTUS who gives a crap about US, US Citizens. He pays lip service then goes on another ICE raid tirade. Don't forget he gave 40 BILLION to Argentina and refused to release money for our OWN people on SNAP till the courts FORCED him to release money that could be used for just that but he now says IN SPITE OF COURT RULING, he is holding off, letting folks not get the food they need, which AGAIN PROVES he could give a rats ass about our own people but he professes LOVE to Kim Jong Un, and calls Putin a GENIUS. Yep, he really has our interest at heart. In a pigs ass.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@AverageJoe1 said
Bill Gates, who knows a dame site more than you do about the world view, says he was wrong, that Climate Change is no big deal. I didn't read this, as I know enough about it, but it should let you know that, just maaaaaaayyyyybbee, you are wrong again!!!!!

https://www.thefp.com/p/bill-gates-has-finally-admitted-that-climate-doomerism-mistake?https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thefp.co ...[text shortened]... Could you do some new topics? Maybe save one day,, like thursdays,.....for conspiracy theory day???
Then come back in 30 years and see what REALLY happens when humans get greedy and refuses to even acknowledge there is a problem, when Manhattan starts getting flooded, where coastal cities around the globe are in danger of being submerged. But you could care less, it is your GRANDKIDS problem, who cares how many of THAT generation dies because of the ABSOLUTE GREED of OUR generation.


@AverageJoe1 said
Check out this oblivious-to-economics liberal who does not take into consideration the amount of revenues due to Trump, the trillions in investments from all those countries who bowed in his economic presence. This will bring big bucks, catch the train, #47.

I made up a phrase that you got to spend money to make money, and my granny says, from her kitchen stove, you have to break eggs to make an omelette.
Look at you Joe. The writing between the lines of your post is that big government is good for economies and trickles down to taxpayers.

I disagree.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
What we need a WHOLE lot more is a POTUS who gives a crap about US, US Citizens. He pays lip service then goes on another ICE raid tirade. Don't forget he gave 40 BILLION to Argentina and refused to release money for our OWN people on SNAP till the courts FORCED him to release money that could be used for just that but he now says IN SPITE OF COURT RULING, he is holding off ...[text shortened]... to Kim Jong Un, and calls Putin a GENIUS. Yep, he really has our interest at heart. In a pigs ass.
your love to Kim and genius to Putin are out of context. Come to earth.


@sonhouse said
What we need a WHOLE lot more is a POTUS who gives a crap about US, US Citizens. He pays lip service then goes on another ICE raid tirade. Don't forget he gave 40 BILLION to Argentina and refused to release money for our OWN people on SNAP till the courts FORCED him to release money that could be used for just that but he now says IN SPITE OF COURT RULING, he is holding off ...[text shortened]... to Kim Jong Un, and calls Putin a GENIUS. Yep, he really has our interest at heart. In a pigs ass.
I read that the dems are keeping food out of the mouths of the hungry , and rent money out of the pockets of rent-payers

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
Then come back in 30 years and see what REALLY happens when humans get greedy and refuses to even acknowledge there is a problem, when Manhattan starts getting flooded, where coastal cities around the globe are in danger of being submerged. But you could care less, it is your GRANDKIDS problem, who cares how many of THAT generation dies because of the ABSOLUTE GREED of OUR generation.
Lord, we are back to submerged sea coast towns. But USA is resilient, and will somehow handle it.

You say 30 years. AOC, who will run for president in 2026, said TWELVE years about 15 years ago.
AOC and Sonhouse, sitting in a tree..............................

Vote Up
Vote Down

@AverageJoe1 said
Lord, we are back to submerged sea coast towns. But USA is resilient, and will somehow handle it.

You say 30 years. AOC, who will run for president in 2026, said TWELVE years about 15 years ago.
AOC and Sonhouse, sitting in a tree..............................
You don't need to worry, 30 years you will be dead, the next few generations will VILIFY our generation for FKING up the planet