- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
....The Republicans were quick to toss those accusations around the Impeachment Debate, but does my memory serve me when I say that these are the very accusations that those same Republicans made against TRUMP during the Republican Primaries? Does anyone remember what Mitt Romney, Chris Christy and even, yes Lindsey Graham said of TRUMP during the primaries? ....'Wanted to impeach Trump on the first day'....I heard that phrase batted around by Those loyal Republican Statesmen, yesterday too. .....Wait a second, public fact; the day after OBAMA'S Inauguration, the entire REPUBLICAN HOUSE & SENATE met and decided that they would OPPOSE EVERY SINGLE PROPOSAL that OBAMA PUT FORWARD in order to insure that Obama would be a one term president. ..There were even times when The Republicans had an idea that Obama agreed with and The Republicans changed course, mid stream, just because Obama embraced it........Ridiculous..........Remember when Governor Christy received flak for embracing Obama after his special help(unlike Bush & KATRINA)following hurricane Sandy that devastated New Jersey...This impeachment is a farce. The Repuplicans spent $50 million, in 1992 dollars to investigate a sexual dalliance, that President Clinton untruthfully denied so they charged him with obstruction....A private act, between consenting adults, I think most husbands would deny that....Little government, you argue? By the way, Clinton did answer live questions, under oath, as opposed to OUR FEARLESS LEADER TRUMP, who would only take written questions, not under oath, submitted in advance.....he didn't even answer many of the questions that were submitted..........This impeachment is not about a blowjob in THE WHITE HOUSE, this is about subverting a whole country just in order to increase TRUMPS chance to win....as RUSSIA did ~~PROVEN~~in 2016.....How quickly we forget. I don't expect Trump to be put out of office, but this historic proceeding will ALWAYS BE REMEMBERED AS A DARK STAIN ON TRUMP'S PRESIDENCY.
@sonhouse saidGraham Cracker! BWAhahahaha!
@jimm619
Amen brother. History books will cast Trump in a VERY negative light. As well as Moscow Mitch and Graham Cracker. And Jordan and all the rest of the Trump sycophants, lips firmly glued to Trump's ass.
I was trying to come up with an epithet for Graham the other day and somehow missed this gem.
@sonhouse saidNobody else? What about people on The other side. No I guess not. Naa, no one.
@jimm619
Amen brother. History books will cast Trump in a VERY negative light. As well as Moscow Mitch and Graham Cracker. And Jordan and all the rest of the Trump sycophants, lips firmly glued to Trump's ass.
@averagejoe1 saidJordan needs a wardrobe consultant.
Nobody else? What about people on The other side. No I guess not. Naa, no one.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@AverageJoe1..LESS THAN AVERAGE, Why do you guys always want to point at someone else...........We haven't brought up THE WAR CRIMES COMMITTED by THE BUSH Administration.......You guys are still pointing at Hillary and she's been out of government 7 years........Quit watching SEAN HANNITY, and listening to RUSH LIMBAUGH.....try thinking for yourself.
@jimm619 saidOK. Here’s a thought, How come you turkeys are claiming Trump is guilty of the Quid Pro Quo charge, but you have not mentioned that Pelosi is CLEARLY guilty of Quid Pro Quo by holding back the impeachment report from the Senate until the Senate.meets her demands. Standing by for your response. (Should she thus be impeached%?)
@AverageJoe1..LESS THAN AVERAGE, Why do you guys always want to point at someone else...........We haven't brought up THE WAR CRIMES COMMITTED by THE BUSH Administration.......You guys are still pointing at Hillary and she's been out of government 7 years........Quit watching SEAN HANNITY, and listening to RUSH LIMBAUGH.....try thinking for yourself.
@averagejoe1 saidHere's the difference, genius, let's see if you can stretch your brain enough to understand it.
OK. Here’s a thought, How come you turkeys are claiming Trump is guilty of the Quid Pro Quo charge, but you have not mentioned that Pelosi is CLEARLY guilty of Quid Pro Quo by holding back the impeachment report from the Senate until the Senate.meets her demands. Standing by for your response. (Should she thus be impeached%?)
Trump did the bribery thing to benefit only himself. What Pelosi is doing is to benefit the American People.
@averagejoe1 saidYou can't be that stupid to think Trump won't be vilified by historians for a very long time . You just can't be THAT stupid .
Nobody else? What about people on The other side. No I guess not. Naa, no one.
You can't be that stupid to think the Republican Party won't be vilified by historians for a very long time . You just can't be THAT stupid .
You can't be that stupid to continually use whataboutism as a defense for otherwise not defensible positions . You just can't be THAT stupid .
I could be wrong about the level of your stupidity , but I don't think so .
@jimm619 saidWhat exactly did Obama accomplish in with his time as a congressman?
....The Republicans were quick to toss those accusations around the Impeachment Debate, but does my memory serve me when I say that these are the very accusations that those same Republicans made against TRUMP during the Republican Primaries? Does anyone remember what Mitt Romney, Chris Christy and even, yes Lindsey Graham said of TRUMP during the primaries? ....'Wanted to i ...[text shortened]... ffice, but this historic proceeding will ALWAYS BE REMEMBERED AS A DARK STAIN ON TRUMP'S PRESIDENCY.
What exactly did he receive the Nobel prize for?
Why did he feel the need to go on his apology tour in Europe?'
Did you get to keep your Dr?
Have your insurance costs gone down?
Are your healthcare costs less?
Michelle Obama told us during the hard times, we needed to tighten our belts, take a smaller piece of the pie. How big of a slice of pie did they have?
How big is that slice of pie now? ( estimated worth around 70 million )
Obama is a good speaker, he talks the talk.. But he is that "I" guy.. I did this, I did that.. pull up any speech and see for yourself. Make America great again.. did he accomplish much of anything.. drone strikes soared under obama.. so I suppose he killed our enemies, but did he? Is capturing them better? He took the safer path, to avoid public scrutiny.
I was not a Trump fan, and personally did not think he had much of a chance. But as the debates went on, I saw something, a fighter.. under dog, yes,, but he fought and won. And yes his abrasive in your face actions can be annoying. I hired him to put this country back on top.. Economically and in military strength
But I have resented he Clintons from the day he told us on national TV that he didn't have sexual relations with Monica. Then the stories started coming out about his other sexual activities.. now he wasn't running, so lets talk about his wife.. she left 4 Americans to die in Libya. Yes argue all you want, but she denied extra help, she was asleep at the wheel when that strike occurred.. there were actions we could have taken. Low fly overs, very low. send the rats back into the ground, like a prairie dog town when they see an Eagles shadow from above.. That buys time. Then more lies, Susan Rice is sent out to tell us that was about a video shown, which was a bunch of BS.. Do you even know why we were still there, after all others had left? Look it up.
We have to address term limits now in congress. That was never meant to be a full time occupation, was it? Now it's used as a spring board for wealth.. Are Sanders and Warren rich? To hear them talk, no. facts say other wise.
There are petitions going around states now to call a convention of states, have you seen one?
I think what you may very well see, is these proceedings rallying supporters for Trump, and he will make history by winning again in 2020. This entire thing, is a 2020 election gamble, that may well back fire on the democratic party. Wait and watch.
Did you read and comprehend what I am saying here?
Ruth Ginsberg’s quote.
In an interview with DC newspaper, “The Washington Beguiler,” Ginsberg was straightforward and honest about what she thought:
“Yes, it’s true I am not a fan of President Trump. I find his presence in the White House to be an insult to America and I would love to see him taken out in chains.
But that impeachment was a farce. The House Democrats went ahead with an inquiry and a vote with nothing. No evidence, no real charges, nothing to warrant the whole event. I’m very disappointed in them.
I hate to say it but that whole impeachment was illegal BS. If a case like that ever appeared in my courtroom, I’d have thrown it out immediately and scolded the prosecution for wasting everyone’s time. The Democrats should possibly face consequences for their meaningless disruption of government.”
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@AverageJoe1///////////LESS THAN AVERAGE JOE, You could just as well say that 'MOSCOW MITCH' is holding up the proceedings......My friend, it is VERY USUAL, for the House and Senate to set the rules before proceeding. ...I told you, quit watching HANNITY, and read up on the subject.....Same conference with Clinton, same with Nixon(but it never got that far), same with Johnson.....You know the difference?....CLINTON, NIXON and JOHNSON would allow key witnesses to testify, whereas, 'YOUR BOY TRUMP' WON'T. Does that answer your question? LESS THAN AVERAGE, do you ever read?