Go back
A call for all unite against STANG

A call for all unite against STANG

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Delmer
The bottom line is restricting the forums to subscribers.
Wrong. You are effectively saying that $USD29.95 makes a post any more worthy. There was a time when you would have been burned at the stake for holding such a belief.

skeeter

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
Stang is like the dude standing on a box in Hyde park. The only thing differant is you can LEAVE Hyde park. Here he follows you around like a moose in heat.
Perfect. Stang is only one of a number of foundation stones that are supporting the RHP structure. If you you don't like/understand his message then your options are either to pull down that structure or leave. Too simple.
Be assured, if you leave, you wont be followed.

skeeter

Vote Up
Vote Down

http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=52176&page=1#post_960635

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
http://www.redhotpawn.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=52176&page=1#post_960635
......and your point...??

skeeter

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by skeeter
Perfect. Stang is only one of a number of foundation stones that are supporting the RHP structure. If you you don't like/understand his message then your options are either to pull down that structure or leave. Too simple.
Be assured, if you leave, [b]you
wont be followed.

skeeter[/b]
And if YOU leave, an unlikely event, since you need the neurotic high you get from negative press, there will be rejoicing in the streets like what I saw in Gaza when americans were killed on 9-11.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by skeeter
Wrong. You are effectively saying that $USD29.95 makes a post any more worthy. There was a time when you would have been burned at the stake for holding such a belief.

skeeter
Sadly the days are long past that you would have been burned at the stake for being a witch. We can only hope that society rethinks their position on burning ugly hags for public entertainment.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hand of Hecate
Sadly the days are long past that you would have been burned at the stake for being a witch. We can only hope that society rethinks their position on burning ugly hags for public entertainment.
I wonder how many Bush supporters see the death and suffering in Iraq as entertainment ?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Conscience
I wonder how many Bush supporters see the death and suffering in Iraq as entertainment ?
Stang, can we BUY you out?
Hey everyone, how much would you contribute to a fund that would pay off stang to keep him out of here?

Vote Up
Vote Down

he has no Conscience

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Conscience
I wonder how many Bush supporters see the death and suffering in Iraq as entertainment ?
I know I do. We send packages of hotdogs and marshmallows to the troops for weinie roasts when they napalm those heathens and cook 'em down.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by skeeter
Wrong. You are effectively saying that $USD29.95 makes a post any more worthy. There was a time when you would have been burned at the stake for holding such a belief.

skeeter
I fail to find any sense in what you say, but, in the spirit of fairness, I'll keep looking.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by huckleberryhound
You're still pissed because we argued before, right ?

I'll leave this be then, i just found it strange that i was being singled out, thats all.

Perception is a funny thing.
Well, this is worthy of a reply. I'm not angry really that you argued against me, but it did make me pay more attention to what you say in threads. *On a side note, making me look like I am just angry because of another argument we had so that you can debunk my own argument is called "setting up a straw man." It is a logical fallacy (and an interesting read if you are ever inclined).*

Look at this thread for example. There are a lot of folks asking in a reasonably nice way for STANG to leave. Who are the ones that are being virulent. *hint: you are one*

In fact, whenever it comes to social ostracization (particularly with people like STANG), you are one of the first to throw the stone.

In any case, vive le STANG, en bas avec l'élitisme.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Draxus
Well, this is worthy of a reply. I'm not angry really that you argued against me, but it did make me pay more attention to what you say in threads. *On a side note, making me look like I am just angry because of another argument we had so that you can debunk my own argument is called "setting up a straw man." It is a logical fallacy (and an interesting read ...[text shortened]... one of the first to throw the stone.

In any case, vive le STANG, en bas avec l'élitisme.
You're still sore.

I suppose you're going to reason away any reply i give you in your own special idiom, so i'll go along with your opinion of me, and laugh silently of the irony of your "stone throwing" line.


🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Draxus
I have a hard time agreeing with most of you because of how vile and rude your comments are. I'd rather have STANG posting how about how stupid I am than huckleberryhound, esoterric or xanthos posting their antagonizing, nasty messages any day. It is easy to act the way you guys do behind the anonimity of the internet.

Of course, that is STANG's greatest ...[text shortened]... s in this type of social scapegoating needs to take a look at what is making them act so ugly.
Social scapegoating: a fascinating topic.