Originally posted by sonhousePerfect. Stang is only one of a number of foundation stones that are supporting the RHP structure. If you you don't like/understand his message then your options are either to pull down that structure or leave. Too simple.
Stang is like the dude standing on a box in Hyde park. The only thing differant is you can LEAVE Hyde park. Here he follows you around like a moose in heat.
Be assured, if you leave, you wont be followed.
skeeter
Originally posted by skeeterAnd if YOU leave, an unlikely event, since you need the neurotic high you get from negative press, there will be rejoicing in the streets like what I saw in Gaza when americans were killed on 9-11.
Perfect. Stang is only one of a number of foundation stones that are supporting the RHP structure. If you you don't like/understand his message then your options are either to pull down that structure or leave. Too simple.
Be assured, if you leave, [b]you wont be followed.
skeeter[/b]
Originally posted by skeeterSadly the days are long past that you would have been burned at the stake for being a witch. We can only hope that society rethinks their position on burning ugly hags for public entertainment.
Wrong. You are effectively saying that $USD29.95 makes a post any more worthy. There was a time when you would have been burned at the stake for holding such a belief.
skeeter
Originally posted by Hand of HecateI wonder how many Bush supporters see the death and suffering in Iraq as entertainment ?
Sadly the days are long past that you would have been burned at the stake for being a witch. We can only hope that society rethinks their position on burning ugly hags for public entertainment.
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundWell, this is worthy of a reply. I'm not angry really that you argued against me, but it did make me pay more attention to what you say in threads. *On a side note, making me look like I am just angry because of another argument we had so that you can debunk my own argument is called "setting up a straw man." It is a logical fallacy (and an interesting read if you are ever inclined).*
You're still pissed because we argued before, right ?
I'll leave this be then, i just found it strange that i was being singled out, thats all.
Perception is a funny thing.
Look at this thread for example. There are a lot of folks asking in a reasonably nice way for STANG to leave. Who are the ones that are being virulent. *hint: you are one*
In fact, whenever it comes to social ostracization (particularly with people like STANG), you are one of the first to throw the stone.
In any case, vive le STANG, en bas avec l'élitisme.
Originally posted by DraxusYou're still sore.
Well, this is worthy of a reply. I'm not angry really that you argued against me, but it did make me pay more attention to what you say in threads. *On a side note, making me look like I am just angry because of another argument we had so that you can debunk my own argument is called "setting up a straw man." It is a logical fallacy (and an interesting read ...[text shortened]... one of the first to throw the stone.
In any case, vive le STANG, en bas avec l'élitisme.
I suppose you're going to reason away any reply i give you in your own special idiom, so i'll go along with your opinion of me, and laugh silently of the irony of your "stone throwing" line.
🙂
Originally posted by DraxusSocial scapegoating: a fascinating topic.
I have a hard time agreeing with most of you because of how vile and rude your comments are. I'd rather have STANG posting how about how stupid I am than huckleberryhound, esoterric or xanthos posting their antagonizing, nasty messages any day. It is easy to act the way you guys do behind the anonimity of the internet.
Of course, that is STANG's greatest ...[text shortened]... s in this type of social scapegoating needs to take a look at what is making them act so ugly.