Go back
A different side to Ron Paul

A different side to Ron Paul

Debates

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
04 Jan 12
Vote Up
Vote Down

I don't know how many of you saw Paul's speech last night, but it was interesting and, at the same time, a little bizarre.

Everyone is used to seeing Paul as the outsider, almost the heckler, at these crowded debates. The guy who knows he's not popular but is going to get said what he feels needs to get said come Hell or high water.

Last night was different. On front of throngs of screaming supporters and flushed with quasi-victory (of sorts), he had to give more of a politician's speech. There was still plenty of anti-establishment rhetoric, but the edge was off. There were smiles and "thank yous" and bizarre giggles that had to make the viewer a little uncomfortable.

I do give Paul some credit for being one of the few politicians out there who has the courage of his convictions. But I really don't think he's got the personality to run a long haul campaign. Not that I think he could win anyway with his positions, but he's just not the presidential type.

kmax87
Republicant Retiree

Blade Runner

Joined
09 Oct 04
Moves
107121
Clock
04 Jan 12
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
I don't know how many of you saw Paul's speech last night, but it was interesting and, at the same time, a little bizarre.

Everyone is used to seeing Paul as the outsider, almost the heckler, at these crowded debates. The guy who knows he's not popular but is going to get said what he feels needs to get said come Hell or high water.

Last night was differe think he could win anyway with his positions, but he's just not the presidential type.
In a different way I think Mitt suffers too much irritability when he tries to demand air-time to speak. It comes across as weak and as a person who can be bullied. The cut and thrust of the role he is seeking office for requires a person who can stop a train of thought with a solid alternative. You can't have a President who has to call for an umpire or point to the rules of debate anytime he can't be heard. If he can't articulate a clear message and stop his opponents dead in their tracks, then he also is not the right man for the job.

Sleepyguy
Reepy Rastardly Guy

Dustbin of history

Joined
13 Apr 07
Moves
12835
Clock
04 Jan 12
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
I don't know how many of you saw Paul's speech last night, but it was interesting and, at the same time, a little bizarre.

Everyone is used to seeing Paul as the outsider, almost the heckler, at these crowded debates. The guy who knows he's not popular but is going to get said what he feels needs to get said come Hell or high water.

Last night was differe think he could win anyway with his positions, but he's just not the presidential type.
I saw that speech. I thought Paul just seemed unused to that degree of acceptance and a little giddy. He will probably look back on it as the highlight of his career, unless Santorum appoints him as Secretary of the Treasury of course 🙂

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.