1. Dublin Ireland
    Joined
    31 Oct '12
    Moves
    14235
    19 Jun '13 20:10
    After all the shady deals between George W Bush and Haliburton
    among others, is it now time for Hamid Karzai to flee from Afghanistan?

    Karzai is in power only because it suited Bush to have him there
    and they promised to help him rule Afghanistan and help him defeat
    the Taliban.

    But now the US and NATO have agreed to leave Afghanistan
    and the Taliban are still there. They have not been defeated.
    Indeed the US are talking about having peace discussions with
    the Taliban.

    If the Taliban win major concessions in these peace talks then
    Hamid Karzai may pack his bags and run.

    If this happens will he seek asylum in the USA? Would the USA accept him?

    I am certain that Karzai will be killed if he remains.
    He will be seen by the Taliban as a puppet of America
    and his life won't be worth the price of a loaf of bread.

    The USA are pragmatic and will deal with whoever is left in charge.
  2. Joined
    12 Jul '08
    Moves
    13814
    19 Jun '13 20:131 edit
    I agree. Why hang around in that country? I'm sure that he's got a ton of money, why not move and disappear? Great advice. You should see if Karzai will give you a job.
  3. Dublin Ireland
    Joined
    31 Oct '12
    Moves
    14235
    19 Jun '13 20:24

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  4. Dublin Ireland
    Joined
    31 Oct '12
    Moves
    14235
    19 Jun '13 23:20
    Originally posted by Eladar
    I agree. Why hang around in that country? I'm sure that he's got a ton of money, why not move and disappear? Great advice. You should see if Karzai will give you a job.
    If the Taliban get a foothold on the power ladder again
    then Karzai won't be around too long to hand out any jobs.
  5. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    19 Jun '13 23:41
    http://news.yahoo.com/taliban-beheads-two-boys-southern-afghanistan-150548483.html

    KANDAHAR, Afghanistan (Reuters) - Taliban fighters beheaded two boys aged 10 and 16 as a warning to villagers not to cooperate with the Afghan government, local officials said.

    The boys, named Khan and Hameedullah, had travelled to Afghan army and police checkpoints near their home in the southern province of Kandahar, scrounging for leftover food to bring to their families, the officials said.

    "The boys were on their way back ... when they were stopped by Taliban insurgents who beheaded them," the chief of Zhari district, Jamal Agha, told Reuters. "Both of them were innocent children and had nothing to do with government or foreigners."

    The militants have beheaded dozens of people in the last two years, accusing them of aiding the government and its foreign backers led by the United States.

    A Taliban spokesman, Qari Yousuf Ahmadi, said the group was not involved in the boys' killings.

    The Kandahar governor's spokesman, Javid Faisal, said the incident occurred on Sunday. Several hours later their bodies and severed heads were left in their village, he said.

    Kandahar is the birthplace of the Taliban and one of Afghanistan's most restive provinces.

    In July last year in the same district, a 16-year-old boy accused by the Taliban of spying for the government was beheaded and skinned. The next month, a girl aged six and a boy of 12 were kidnapped and beheaded in separate incidents in Kandahar and the east of the country.

    Such incidents highlight the difficulty that Taliban leaders have in enforcing discipline across an estimated 20,000 fighters spread from Afghanistan to Pakistan.

    The leadership is trying to improve the group's image in case it wants to push forward tentative reconciliation steps and perhaps even enter mainstream politics. But some militant units have proved hard to control, roaming the countryside and killing or maiming those they deem immoral.

    The beheading occurred the day before seven Taliban insurgents including suicide bombers attacked country's international airport in the capital, Kabul.

    Also on Monday, six insurgents with suicide vests and heavy guns attacked a government compound in the provincial center of Zabul, wounding at least 18 people.

    Concerns are mounting over how the 352,000-strong Afghan security forces will cope with an intensifying Taliban insurgency once most foreign troops leave by the end of next year.
  6. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    19 Jun '13 23:48
    Originally posted by johnnylongwoody
    After all the shady deals between George W Bush and Haliburton
    among others, is it now time for Hamid Karzai to flee from Afghanistan?

    Karzai is in power only because it suited Bush to have him there
    and they promised to help him rule Afghanistan and help him defeat
    the Taliban.

    But now the US and NATO have agreed to leave Afghanistan
    and t ...[text shortened]... rice of a loaf of bread.

    The USA are pragmatic and will deal with whoever is left in charge.
    Who cares what happens to Karzai? If he's smart he'll wind up with a nice villa on the Rivera. The US should have given up on the remaking Afghanistan into a nice Western-type, capitalist, liberal, "democracy" a long time ago.
  7. The Catbird's Seat
    Joined
    21 Oct '06
    Moves
    2598
    20 Jun '13 00:02
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    Who cares what happens to Karzai? If he's smart he'll wind up with a nice villa on the Rivera. The US should have given up on the remaking Afghanistan into a nice Western-type, capitalist, liberal, "democracy" a long time ago.
    It never ought to have been a goal in the first place.
  8. Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    28 Jun '13 23:23

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  9. Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    28 Jun '13 23:45

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  10. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    12857
    29 Jun '13 02:331 edit
    Originally posted by normbenign
    It never ought to have been a goal in the first place.
    Who says it was ever a goal? This spreading democacy crap is just pure demagoguery.
  11. Joined
    29 Mar '09
    Moves
    816
    29 Jun '13 03:36
    Originally posted by no1marauder
    Who cares what happens to Karzai? If he's smart he'll wind up with a nice villa on the Rivera. The US should have given up on the remaking Afghanistan into a nice Western-type, capitalist, liberal, "democracy" a long time ago.
    More like the taliban worked out a deal with the CIA concerning opium exports.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree