A nobel peace prize… for trump…

@shavixmir said
Okay. Stop laughing.

Netenuahoo (war criminal) has nominated trump (dumb arse who bombed a country the US is not at war with) for the prize.

The world had went completely mental.

Surely Netenuahoo is just being modest, he must reckon he has a chance himself, and Putin must be in with a shout.

@AverageJoe1 said
Well I’ll be dipped and doodled.. Biden is better than Reagan was. I’m so upset I think I will repost that answer.

OK. Marauders says tax payers do not have their money go towards payment of tuitions. He say the debt just disappears. The small town of Hayfield Oregon loans $100k out of the treasury to citizens who use it for college in Boise 300 miles away, and the ci ...[text shortened]... that mean you are incapable of talking about issues as complex as ICE treatment of prisoners?
Reply

Don't bitch to me as if I have influence over historians. You have a gripe about that contact the historians, don't gargle your incomprehensible BS to me.

Tell me where in the Peace prize literature it says a convicted FELON convicted of a real crime, not a political kangaroo court thing where the dictator says I don't like your opinion of me therefore you go to jail for 3 years.
There happens to be an IMMENSE difference between those two kinds of convictions.
Trump was convicted because he is a PROVEN IN UNBIASED COURT he is in fact a CRIMINAL based on real evidence ANY court would have said is illegal.
Not a put Nelson Mandela in jail because YOU PISS ME OFF.

@Indonesia-Phil said
Surely Netenuahoo is just being modest, he must reckon he has a chance himself, and Putin must be in with a shout.

It will all depend upon who votes when the Nobel Hierarchy makes the decision. Personal thoughts will run rampant. Like, "We will not be so threatened anymore (Death to America, Wipe Israel off the map), so in that way, it was a good thing." "We were being assaulted by Iran with those words, and assault can be met exactly tit for tat." The Belgians and the Austrailians wojld not care about these reasons.......Why? Because they were not being threatened, you see. If teh Aussies felt nukes were imminent, Death To The Aussies", they would have begged Trump to do wlontthing We acted first....should we have just waited to see if they fired off missiles?? So many issues.
I don't think they were saying to Death to Shavixmir, so he probably would not give Trump the prize.

@sonhouse said
Don't bitch to me as if I have influence over historians. You have a gripe about that contact the historians, don't gargle your incomprehensible BS to me.

Tell me where in the Peace prize literature it says a convicted FELON convicted of a real crime, not a political kangaroo court thing where the dictator says I don't like your opinion of me therefore you go to jail for ...[text shortened]... nce ANY court would have said is illegal.
Not a put Nelson Mandela in jail because YOU PISS ME OFF.

There is that YOU word again. Yet you actually write to yourself. What a mystery wrapped up in an enigma.

@AverageJoe1 said
It will all depend upon who votes when the Nobel Hierarchy makes the decision. Personal thoughts will run rampant. Like, "We will not be so threatened anymore (Death to America, Wipe Israel off the map), so in that way, it was a good thing." "We were being assaulted by Iran with those words, and assault can be met exactly tit for tat." The Belgians and the Austrailians ...[text shortened]... I don't think they were saying to Death to Shavixmir, so he probably would not give Trump the prize.

Look up the word 'irony' in the dictionary.

@AverageJoe1 said
Well I’ll be dipped and doodled.. Biden is better than Reagan was. I’m so upset I think I will repost that answer.

OK. Marauders says tax payers do not have their money go towards payment of tuitions. He say the debt just disappears. The small town of Hayfield Oregon loans $100k out of the treasury to citizens who use it for college in Boise 300 miles away, and the ci ...[text shortened]... that mean you are incapable of talking about issues as complex as ICE treatment of prisoners?
Reply

What the hell is wrong with you?

@AverageJoe1 said
Do you agree with Reagan's famous speech, showing Peace through Strength? Are you are aware that the cretins like Kohmeni and Putin et al respect only strength? You, who want to disarm strength as we speak?

I've probably never agreed with anything Reagan said.

@Suzianne said
I've probably never agreed with anything Reagan said.

Oh ye of little faith, how DARE you dissent from the magical words of our esteemed president Reagan?🙂
I mean, you don't like "khrushchev TEAR DOWN THOSE WALLS", HOW COULD YOU🙂

@Suzianne said
I've probably never agreed with anything Reagan said.

So who in his bracket DO you agree with ? This should be interesting. For reference, you could hardly agree with Biden, who tried to remove our borders....here is a president of a country who wanted the country to NOT be a country, as, a requisite element of the definition of a country,,,,is a border.
Entertain us. (I've asked Sonhouse to sit our for today.....benched, if you will)

@sonhouse said
Oh ye of little faith, how DARE you dissent from the magical words of our esteemed president Reagan?🙂
I mean, you don't like "khrushchev TEAR DOWN THOSE WALLS", HOW COULD YOU🙂

Really, Sonhouse. Gather yourself, go to the locker room.

@AverageJoe1 said
Really, Sonhouse. Gather yourself, go to the locker room.

I see some of your problems with reading comprehension and ability to read more than a paragraph at a time even though complex issues REQUIRE more than one frigging paragraph, but the first part, you don't seem to be able to see when a post is sarcasm. The second part is I am sorry for your inability to read more than a whole paragraph if that. Complex issues CANNOT be chopped down to a single sentence or paragraph.

@sonhouse said
I see some of your problems with reading comprehension and ability to read more than a paragraph at a time even though complex issues REQUIRE more than one frigging paragraph, but the first part, you don't seem to be able to see when a post is sarcasm. The second part is I am sorry for your inability to read more than a whole paragraph if that. Complex issues CANNOT be chopped down to a single sentence or paragraph.

All due respect, you will agree that Your posts are basically rants., which you referred to as complex Issues. Get real… They are rants. so, that’s that. It would follow that if you are ranting, that sarcasm would be the last thing that you should squeeze into ranting. Nobody knows who is on first base don’t you see.
And,absolutely of course I would not recognize sarcasm ever in one of your rants.
You are aware I am sure that one of the signature elements of your posting is that you speak as though you are exactly right and put down anyone who does not listen and agree listen and agree. Listen and agree.. as to this forum, I respectfully submitthat you are not among the top debaters

@AverageJoe1 said
So who in his bracket DO you agree with ? This should be interesting. For reference, you could hardly agree with Biden, who tried to remove our borders....here is a president of a country who wanted the country to NOT be a country, as, a requisite element of the definition of a country,,,,is a border.
Entertain us. (I've asked Sonhouse to sit our for today.....benched, if you will)

Bracket?

This ain't the NCAA basketball championship.

Although, like the March Hare, you can be a little mad.

@AverageJoe1 said
All due respect, you will agree that Your posts are basically rants., which you referred to as complex Issues. Get real… They are rants. so, that’s that. It would follow that if you are ranting, that sarcasm would be the last thing that you should squeeze into ranting. Nobody knows who is on first base don’t you see.
And,absolutely of course I would not recognize sarcas ...[text shortened]... e. Listen and agree.. as to this forum, I respectfully submitthat you are not among the top debaters

Don't post while drunk.