Go back
A thread to restart all the 'gay' threads

A thread to restart all the 'gay' threads

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Go ahead. You can continue the gayness now.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Go ahead. You can continue the gayness now.
So what thread is restarting this one.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by UmbrageOfSnow
So what thread is restarting this one.
Only thing missing is CU's resident back street gardner. Ah well...that was probably just to much to expect.

skeeter

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Go ahead. You can continue the gayness now.
Do catamites have the same rights as sodomites?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nargaguna
Do catamites have the same rights as sodomites?
Why? Are you a sodomite?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Respect the mate, discrimination sucks and his/her sexual preferences are unimportant to judge his/her character.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
Respect the mate, discrimination sucks and his/her sexual preferences are unimportant to judge his/her character.
respect a joke and lighten up

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Vladamir no1
respect a joke and lighten up
it was part of the joke, dum! LOL

😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
it was part of the joke, dum! LOL

😉
DOH! I took too much sun today as I avoided the match by going to the park, it was dead, no tv's in the park 🙂

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nargaguna
Do catamites have the same rights as sodomites?
Well, catamites are children, and sodomites are not necessarily so. That's really the only difference. Both have all the rights any other human has if we're going to use the philosophical concept of "rights". I'm more of a utilitarian than someone into "rights" though I think the "rights" concept works out pretty well.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Well, catamites are children, and sodomites are not necessarily so. That's really the only difference. Both have all the rights any other human has if we're going to use the philosophical concept of "rights". I'm more of a utilitarian than someone into "rights" though I think the "rights" concept works out pretty well.
Thank you for the information. Perhaps you can also explain why catamites and sodomites call themselves 'gay' when, in fact, many do not appear to be happy and joyful, or gay in the ordinarily accepted meaning of the word.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nargaguna
Thank you for the information. Perhaps you can also explain why catamites and sodomites call themselves 'gay' when, in fact, many do not appear to be happy and joyful, or gay in the ordinarily accepted meaning of the word.
Some people believe that "gay" is an an acronym for "good as you." This is a nice theory, but without foundation. "Gay" has had many different meanings in the past. It was used as a synonym for happy by Chaucer in the 14th century. By 1637, it took on the meaning of a person leading a loose and immoral life. By 1825, it was sometimes used to refer to female hookers. By the late 19th century, it meant to be in good health or to be convalescent. A "gay house" was a brothel. "Gay" was first used to refer to a male homosexual in the 1933 play "Young & Evil." Cary Grant used it in the 1938 movie "Bringing up Baby" to refer to a transvestite. Gershn Legman & G.V. Henry mentioned the term in their book Sexual Variations (1941). In recent years, it has been used to refer to lesbians as well as homosexual males.

http://www.funtrivia.com/ask.cfm?action=details&qnid=45012

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nargaguna
Thank you for the information. Perhaps you can also explain why catamites and sodomites call themselves 'gay' when, in fact, many do not appear to be happy and joyful, or gay in the ordinarily accepted meaning of the word.
Gay is not accepted as meaning "happy". It has changed, in much the same way as "let" now means the opposite of what it used to mean. Language evolves and moves on.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wheely
Gay is not accepted as meaning "happy". It has changed, in much the same way as "let" now means the opposite of what it used to mean. Language evolves and moves on.
But it still connotes 'light-hearted' to a normal English-speaking person does it not?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nargaguna
But it still connotes 'light-hearted' to a normal English-speaking person does it not?
Not any more Nargaguna, no. I think it still keeps the old definition in the dictionary along with the newer one but I've not heard anybody use it to mean "happy" or light hearted since Larry Grayson and even he was using it as humour.