Go back
afghanistan

afghanistan

Debates

h

Joined
23 Sep 08
Moves
25967
Clock
08 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Heard that the heroin production has risen since britain and the other western terrorist nations began their land grabbing there, anybody have thoughts on this? the british monarchy has tried to take afghanistan before due to the riches of drug running, somebody should study history more closer to see the hidden truth.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
09 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Yep, Afghanistan is one rich country. No wonder the Western world wants to take it over. Look at it. It is just flowing over with rich people all over the place. It's always been one of the richest countries in the world.

Having said all that, there is a lot of money to be made in the opium industry. I'm sure there are a lot of shady characters in high places throughout the world who want in on the action. Too bad the Taliban had to declare a jihad on the US. I guess after they defeated Russia they nothing better to do.

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
09 Aug 10
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hintjul
Heard that the heroin production has risen since britain and the other western terrorist nations began their land grabbing there, anybody have thoughts on this? the british monarchy has tried to take afghanistan before due to the riches of drug running, somebody should study history more closer to see the hidden truth.
The one good thing about the Taliban was that they always cracked down on opium production. Driving them out was bound to have the negative effect of increasing the production of a major cash crop by a very poor country.

Although the Taliban are arguably back (though not to their pre-9/11 level of control over the country), I suppose that don't have the time or inclination to worry as much about secondary issues like drug production.

"Land grabbing" is a ridiculous term in this context. As Eladar said, Western countries have no interest on occupying or controlling Afghanistan except insofar as is necessary to neutralize the Taliban.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
09 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

When I did a google search on this, I read articles that claimed that the opium profits were helping to fund the Taliban. I guess the need for money gets to us all.

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
09 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
When I did a google search on this, I read articles that claimed that the opium profits were helping to fund the Taliban. I guess the need for money gets to us all.
I know they cracked down dramatically on it in the 90s. Maybe at this point, they are no longer interested in worrying about petty things like their religious morality and are more interested in surviving.

utherpendragon

Hy-Brasil

Joined
24 Feb 09
Moves
175970
Clock
09 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
The one good thing about the Taliban was that they always cracked down on opium production. Driving them out was bound to have the negative effect of increasing the production of a major cash crop by a very poor country.

Although the Taliban are arguably back (though not to their pre-9/11 level of control over the country), I suppose that don't have the time ...[text shortened]... ccupying or controlling Afghanistan except insofar as is necessary to neutralize the Taliban.
IMO "western terrorist nations" is a better example of "ridiculous term".

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
09 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

About the British monarchy:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_wars

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
09 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by utherpendragon
IMO "western terrorist nations" is a better example of "ridiculous term".
conceded; I hadn't even noticed that term for whatever reason

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
09 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
About the British monarchy:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_wars
What does that have to do with 2010?

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
09 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
What does that have to do with 2010?
Nothing at all, just providing the historical perspective.

h

Joined
23 Sep 08
Moves
25967
Clock
10 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

knowledge is key.

SR

Joined
18 May 09
Moves
3183
Clock
10 Aug 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
About the British monarchy:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_wars
The British monarchy?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.