@Earl-of-Trumps saidYeah. I did. I found out that the Quran has some pretty clear instructions to kill Jews.
@Rajk999 said - Then there are those whose life mission is the killing of Jews.
So the first group chose life and the latter chose death.
-------------------
Did you ever try yo figure out why their life mission is to kill Jews?
I think you are playing dumb here
1 edit
@no1marauder saidSo then, no laws were broken by the British or the UN as it was just a suggested accomodation so that the two parties can continue to co-exist, and as you stated the Arabs did not accept the suggested partition plan. There is no question of legality then. A suggested plan which is rejected can simply be ignored. The Arabs chose war, rather then diplomacy.
There was "minor fighting" by the Zionists against the British Empire even when the latter was at war with a Nazi regime that was exterminating millions of Jews in Europe. Most of the operations by Zionists against Arabs that you describe as "minor" were based on ethnic cleansing and were War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity.
The British didn't, and couldn't, partit ...[text shortened]... pays any attention knows whatever I think of the original partition, I support a two-State solution.
Great. According to the history, the Arabs initiated an attack on the Jews and they were the ones that initiated hostilities in 1948 when the British departed, and they the ones claiming that there will be no Jewish state. The Jews never said there will be no Arab state. Here are the details of the start of the war in 1948 according to CoPilot:
1. Even before the British departure in May 1948, Palestinian Arabs had already violently rejected the 1947 UN Partition Plan, which they viewed as unfair and favoring the Jewish minority. Arab reaction to the plan was “prompt and violent,” involving strikes, demonstrations, and riots, which escalated by early 1948 into organized hostilities. Palestinian irregular forces (such as the Arab Liberation Army and local militias) had begun attacking Jewish settlements, cities, and transportation routes. [2001-2009.state.gov]
2. Immediate Arab military intervention after the British withdrawal
When Britain officially ended the Mandate on May 14–15, 1948, and Israel declared independence, Arab states launched a full-scale military invasion.
According to multiple sources:
- Five Arab nations—Egypt, Transjordan (Jordan), Syria, Iraq, and Lebanon—invaded the territory of the former Mandate immediately after the British withdrawal. [2001-2009.state.gov], [britannica.com]
- Arab forces crossed into Palestine within hours of the British exit and Israel’s declaration of independence. [britannica.com]
- The goal of this intervention was explicitly to prevent the establishment of the Jewish state and overturn the UN partition plan.
3. Arab League states’ stated motives
- Arab states entered the conflict with a unified public mission:
- To block the creation of Israel, which they believed the UN had unfairly imposed.
- To support Palestinian Arabs, who opposed the partition and felt their demographic majority had been overridden.
As one diplomatic record summarized at the time:
Arabs had agreed that a Zionist state “could not be tolerated” in the Arab world and prepared militarily to prevent its formation.
4. Consequences for the Palestinian Arab community
The Arab response led to:
- Full-scale war between Arab armies and the new Israeli state.
- The displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinian Arabs, known as the Nakba (“catastrophe&rdquo😉.
- The collapse of Palestinian Arab social and political structures, which had already been weakened during the civil war phase.
***********************************
@Cliff-Mashburn saidThat is what you wrote about why OPEC nations support war with Iran
Interesting take but that is not what is happening...try again.
@Rajk999 saidThere was already war as has been explained and shown to you dozens of times.
So then, no laws were broken by the British or the UN as it was just a suggested accomodation so that the two parties can continue to co-exist, and as you stated the Arabs did not accept the suggested partition plan. There is no question of legality then. A suggested plan which is rejected can simply be ignored. The Arabs chose war, rather then diplomacy.
Great. Accord ...[text shortened]... es, which had already been weakened during the civil war phase.
***********************************
I don't know where you got that incredibly biased source from, but Zionist militias had been waging war against the Arab population and British forces for years. Funny it doesn't mention that.
@Rajk999 saidSome success, Israelis have died in all kinds of attacks, drones, shooters and the like.
No need to stop Israel.
If you dont attack Israel, they leave you alone.
So its 100 years of people harrassing them, without success.
I was shot at by a Palestinian when we lived in Jerusalem and 6 folks died that night but don't forget about the 1200 or so killed and kidnapped at the Nova fest.
My family band didn't get that far south, we played Jacob's Ladder and fests at Kibbutz.
@AThousandYoung saidThat’s not the bloody point.
There's a big difference between Canaan and all of Eurasia. Anyway Mongolia is 75 times larger than Israel.
There is no basis for people claiming an area as historical homeland, when they, themselves, never lived there or that their ancestors may have lived there 2000 years ago, because you have sort of the same bloody religion as they had back in the day.
That’s utter madness.
Oh, I have pictish blood in me… I have a right to boot people in Northern China or Mongolia out of their houses….
Duh.
Oh, I was raised Catholic. My ancestors were probably from Nazareth… I’ll kick the people there out of their homes.
Double Duh.
@no1marauder saidAccording to what historians accept as factual, the war started in 1948, when the 5 surrounding Arab nations invaded Palestine to ensure that a Jewish state was not set up. Prior to that there was hostilities, acts of terrorism, gang warfare and scuffles. There was no war in that area from 1918 when the British took over from the Ottoman Empire, and 1948, when they left Palestine.
There was already war as has been explained and shown to you dozens of times.
I don't know where you got that incredibly biased source from, but Zionist militias had been waging war against the Arab population and British forces for years. Funny it doesn't mention that.
5 edits
@AThousandYoung said
Besides the Niger-Congo, there are extremely black skinned people called the Nilo-Saharans who are really tall and skinny. Ethiopians are neither of these - they are actually Afro-Asiatic like Jews, Egyptians, Arabs and Moors.
EDIT There is a name for Ethiopians which Robo-Mod thinks is inappropriate language possibly because it has the word sh* in it. If you look ...[text shortened]... ou can see the other name of Ethiopians which looks like a marijuana strain.
tinyurl.com/352b3hu5
@AThousandYoung saidY’all are just too deep for average Joe, and I’m not really into collegiate level studies. But I do enjoy watching Trump in his press conference today and would hope that you all would find it on YouTube and picture Kamala Harris standing there answering questions like this…cackling.. He is absolutely the greatest president we’ve ever had use any words you want, the word communicator comes to mind. Actually, I’ve never heard him laugh. All I ever heard, it do was laugh..
[youtube Geography Now Ethiopia]eAB6o1rLH1w[/youtube]
WHAT A LAUGH!!!!
PS… ha , she would NOT be standing there!!!!
@AverageJoe1 saidYou really have to learn the difference between your dreamworld and reality.
Y’all are just too deep for average Joe, and I’m not really into collegiate level studies. But I do enjoy watching Trump in his press conference today and would hope that you all would find it on YouTube and picture Kamala Harris standing there answering questions like this…cackling.. He is absolutely the greatest president we’ve ever had use any words you want, the word ...[text shortened]... ll I ever heard, it do was laugh..
WHAT A LAUGH!!!!
PS… ha , she would NOT be standing there!!!!
1 edit
@AThousandYoung saidThe three types of African black people in an image:
Besides the Niger-Congo, there are extremely black skinned people called the Nilo-Saharans who are really tall and skinny. Ethiopians are neither of these - they are actually Afro-Asiatic like Jews, Egyptians, Arabs and Moors.
EDIT There is a name for Ethiopians which Robo-Mod thinks is inappropriate language possibly because it has the word sh* in it. If you look ...[text shortened]... ou can see the other name of Ethiopians which looks like a marijuana strain.
tinyurl.com/352b3hu5
https://img.sewasew.com/definitions/9301ea0b3c6b4f678a1b2d47c6c3993e_640_360
Bantu is part of the Niger Congo or "Black" ethnic group. Nilotic is Nilo-Saharan and [C word for Ethiopian] is Afro Asiatic such as Ethiopian.
Notice the Nilotic guy on the left is blacker than the Black Bantu guy in the middle.
Google AI with the following prompt - "facial features african ethnic groups"
Facial features across African ethnic groups are highly diverse, influenced by regional ancestry, environment, and genetics. West/Central Africans often have rounder faces and broader noses, while East Africans (like Maasai) may have elongated faces and narrow noses. Horn of Africa populations (Ethiopians/Somalis) often display high cheekbones and narrower noses due to distinct ancestral mixing.
Key Regional Variations
West/Central Africa (e.g., Nigerians, Ghanaians): Characterized by broader, flatter noses with lower nasal bridge projection, wider mouths, and robust features.
East Africa (e.g., Kenya, Tanzania): Pastoralist groups like the Maasai often have longer, narrower faces and noses.
Horn of Africa (e.g., Ethiopia, Somalia): Often features high cheekbones, slender faces, and narrower, sharper noses.
Southern Africa (e.g., Khoisan/Bantu): The Khoisan are known for unique features such as lighter skin, epicanthic eye folds, and flatter faces, while Bantu-speaking groups display high diversity.