03 Oct '09 22:20>
Why doesn't the federal government offer a match to any state program that meets certain criteria such as extending coverage to lower income and creating a state fund for people fitting under "pre-existing condition" categories?
It could match dollar for dollar the benefits chosen by a state, but the state that choses to do universal care within its state would have to pay half of it at least. This would mean that an individual state could avoid participating, still save money for its residents by not doing a state program, and yet it could chose its own more moderate or conservative state program.
The federal government would still be taxing people more, but at least the states would have to share half their state's pain. A state could put a very basic and temporary coverage program that helps the poorest for 5 years til they get their own, and the federal government would help them pay half of it. A state could just do a "pre-existing condition" program and the federal government would help pay half of that.
What happened to federalism in America? Why not subsidize care in a way that respects freedom instead of forcing every state to participate in a giant national bureaucratic mess that seeks extreme forms of universal coverage?
It could match dollar for dollar the benefits chosen by a state, but the state that choses to do universal care within its state would have to pay half of it at least. This would mean that an individual state could avoid participating, still save money for its residents by not doing a state program, and yet it could chose its own more moderate or conservative state program.
The federal government would still be taxing people more, but at least the states would have to share half their state's pain. A state could put a very basic and temporary coverage program that helps the poorest for 5 years til they get their own, and the federal government would help them pay half of it. A state could just do a "pre-existing condition" program and the federal government would help pay half of that.
What happened to federalism in America? Why not subsidize care in a way that respects freedom instead of forcing every state to participate in a giant national bureaucratic mess that seeks extreme forms of universal coverage?