Liberals. You'll no doubt make some gains in this years midterms, but the 2028 general election will be here before you know it, and you folks (and your messaging) is as fragmented as a busted windshield.
You're against Trump because he won't fully release the Epstein files, he's too cozy with billionaires, he doesn't care about affordability, he's weaponized the justice system to persecute his political rivals, he hates the environment, he's run up the national debt, he says ugly things about women and minorities, and on and on and on....
American voters can't keep more than 1 issue in their head at a time when it comes to casting their ballot, and if you folks on the left (and your candidates) don't start rallying around one central theme, and pound that message home, you'll have that old elephant flying over the Whitehouse for a long time to come. Bill Clinton's message was "it's the economy stupid!" - and despite his womanizing ways, left office with a federal surplus, and more popular than 90% of all Presidents.
No one is coming to save you Liberals, either do this, or you'll get left behind - again!
@paradox4 said"Bill Clinton's message was "it's the economy stupid!" - and despite his womanizing ways, left office with a federal surplus, and more popular than 90% of all Presidents."
Liberals. You'll no doubt make some gains in this years midterms, but the 2028 general election will be here before you know it, and you folks (and your messaging) is as fragmented as a busted windshield.
You're against Trump because he won't fully release the Epstein files, he's too cozy with billionaires, he doesn't care about affordability, he's weaponized the justice ...[text shortened]... idents.
No one is coming to save you Liberals, either do this, or you'll get left behind - again!
What federal surplus?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/surplus
@Metal-Brain saidWhat federal surplus?
"Bill Clinton's message was "it's the economy stupid!" - and despite his womanizing ways, left office with a federal surplus, and more popular than 90% of all Presidents."
What federal surplus?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/surplus
Educate yourself.
https://www.factcheck.org/2008/02/the-budget-and-deficit-under-clinton/
@Metal-Brain saidAnother MAGA mouse that can't accept the truth. How cute.
@paradox4
Bill Clinton did not reduce any debt. By definition that is not a surplus.
- Joined
- 04 May 26
- Moves
- 804
@paradox4
The Democrats lost because they were trying to get people to delusionally believe math is racist and a man in a dress is a woman.
They lost because they thought it was cool and fashionable to "hate the white man"
They lost because they didn't have a Democrat primary and just placed a non white woman in there assuming people must vote for her or they'll be labeled a [enter useless label here that is designed to invoke fear and racism]
They lost because they are the ones who tried to weaponized the justice system against anyone who wasn't a delusional Democrat. You claiming Trump can't do that after what they tried with him, shows you're just another flake.
Worry about your own country if you really are an outsider, which I do not believe. You came around at the same time another poster disappeared.
You also post just like him with your op-ed piece above and your "tactics and otb posts" 🥱
@paradox4 saidThere are two kinds of voters in America: those who vote for principles, such as fiscal responsibility or liberty and justice for all; and there are those who vote for the price of gas.
Liberals. You'll no doubt make some gains in this years midterms, but the 2028 general election will be here before you know it, and you folks (and your messaging) is as fragmented as a busted windshield.
You're against Trump because he won't fully release the Epstein files, he's too cozy with billionaires, he doesn't care about affordability, he's weaponized the justice ...[text shortened]... idents.
No one is coming to save you Liberals, either do this, or you'll get left behind - again!
There are also many who don’t take politics seriously enough to vote. Those who don‘t care about politics will find themselves ruled by evil men.
@PuzZuLz saidAnd then you wonder why we call you dumb asses.
@paradox4
The Democrats lost because they were trying to get people to delusionally believe math is racist and a man in a dress is a woman.
They lost because they thought it was cool and fashionable to "hate the white man"
They lost because they didn't have a Democrat primary and just placed a non white woman in there assuming people must vote for her or they'll be l ...[text shortened]... ppeared.
You also post just like him with your op-ed piece above and your "tactics and otb posts" 🥱
@PuzZuLz saidYeah.
@paradox4
The Democrats lost because they were trying to get people to delusionally believe math is racist and a man in a dress is a woman.
They lost because they thought it was cool and fashionable to "hate the white man"
They lost because they didn't have a Democrat primary and just placed a non white woman in there assuming people must vote for her or they'll be l ...[text shortened]... ppeared.
You also post just like him with your op-ed piece above and your "tactics and otb posts" 🥱
The Democrats had a historical chance establish an enduring majority. The Republican party was humiliated by defeats with good candidates in 2008 and 2012 and was ransacked by Trump in 2016.
With all of Trump's baggage and all the confusion in the GOP, Dems could have dominated American polics for a decade or more.
But they squandered it on identity politics and ivory tower snobbery. While they should have been pushing moderate tax hikes for the rich, better social safety net programs, responsible foreign policy, job creation, universal healthcare, investment in infrastructure and clean energy, and gun safety (all popular causes), they instead wasted so much prestige on trying to force respect for transgenderism, identity politics, looser borders, soft-on-crime approaches, etc.
They blew a historic opporunity, though the GOP is so inept that they're in pretty good position anyway.
- Joined
- 04 May 26
- Moves
- 804
@sh76
Agreed 💯
I don't think the Republicans would have won anything after Obama if Obama and the Dems stayed center and avoided identity politics.
The downfall of the Dems started when Obama avoided the chance to inspire his own people to do better but decided to "blame the white man" and he took racism which was on life support and brought it back.
Since then, they have only gotten worse and more extreme.
Edit, COVID lockdowns and that cop who killed George Floyd certainly did not help anyone or anything.
@PuzZuLz saidCovid reactions were another massive Democratic own goal. Not so much in 2020 itself, but certainly in 2021.
@sh76
Agreed 💯
I don't think the Republicans would have won anything after Obama if Obama and the Dems stayed center and avoided identity politics.
The downfall of the Dems started when Obama avoided the chance to inspire his own people to do better but decided to "blame the white man" and he took racism which was on life support and brought it back.
Since then, ...[text shortened]... dit, COVID lockdowns and that cop who killed George Floyd certainly did not help anyone or anything.
Say what people will about Ron DeSantis, his line "We have somehow gone from 15 days to slow the spread to 3 jabs to keep your job." was one of the great political zingers in recent American political history.
- Joined
- 04 May 26
- Moves
- 804
@sh76
My lady got the shot,
I did not
She has late stage heart failure,
I do not
At the hospital I asked the doctors why she has heart failure all of a sudden and they said they don't know why.
I said, "the vaccine?"
They said no it's not that.
I argued with them because they kept saying they don't know what caused the sudden heart failure but they viciously denied it was the vaccine.
My stance was, if you don't know how it was caused, don't tell me it wasn't the vaccine.
They were so mad 😄
I think they are terrified of admitting their mistake and are willing to just go along with it and let time bury it.
I am very vocal about it in my everyday life because my lady will be lucky to see 2030, she is only 52