another ruling on Jan 6th, which make Metal Brain's point

@metal-Brain has sometuimes assreted that all republiccans were only peaceful protesters, that no violence went from them.

In this light the ruling
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22275517-ruling-on-couy-griffins-eligibility-to-run-for-officer
in New mexiko should be of interest.

TL,DR: finding 37 (page 38) :

Applying these principles, the Court concludes that Mr. Griffin “engaged in” the January 6 insurrection.

Lets waut what the SCOTUS will rule on that.

@ponderable said
@metal-Brain has sometuimes assreted that all republiccans were only peaceful protesters, that no violence went from them.

In this light the ruling
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22275517-ruling-on-couy-griffins-eligibility-to-run-for-officer
in New mexiko should be of interest.

TL,DR: finding 37 (page 38) :

Applying these principles, the Court con ...[text shortened]... fin “engaged in” the January 6 insurrection.

Lets waut what the SCOTUS will rule on that.

Never said all. Stop lying.

@metal-brain said
Never said all. Stop lying.

Did you state that the "protesters" who had been largely "peacful" were "invited" by the Capitol Police?

@ponderable said
Did you state that the "protesters" who had been largely "peacful" were "invited" by the Capitol Police?

Some of them, yes. That is a fact.
Did you watch the video?

@metal-brain said
Some of them, yes. That is a fact.
Did you watch the video?

So all you say is there was an insurrection, many people broke the law, but there also have been some people who behaved peacufl?

Then we can all agree.

@ponderable said
So all you say is there was an insurrection, many people broke the law, but there also have been some people who behaved peacufl?

Then we can all agree.

It was not an insurrection. Even the FBI concluded that.
You need to watch this. You don't know the whole story.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/WvLOzhaH0SDl/

@metal-brain said
It was not an insurrection. Even the FBI concluded that.
You need to watch this. You don't know the whole story.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/WvLOzhaH0SDl/

So you would appeal the court ruling I quoted?

@ponderable said
So you would appeal the court ruling I quoted?

Do you know how Rosanne Boyland died?

@metal-brain said
Do you know how Rosanne Boyland died?

That doesn't answer my question.

The question is a court ruled that an "insurrecvtion" happened.

Would you or wouldn't you appeal?

@metal-brain said
Do you know how Rosanne Boyland died?

The DC medical examiner found the cause of death to be an amphetamine overdose.
I myself have to rely on hera-say here. Have you been there and are you qualified as a medical examiner? have you been present at the post mortem or at least seen the files?

@ponderable said
The DC medical examiner found the cause of death to be an amphetamine overdose.
I myself have to rely on hera-say here. Have you been there and are you qualified as a medical examiner? have you been present at the post mortem or at least seen the files?

That cause of death was changed.
You don't know the whole story.
Watch the video.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/WvLOzhaH0SDl/

@metal-brain said
That cause of death was changed.
You don't know the whole story.
Watch the video.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/WvLOzhaH0SDl/

I am interested in your answers to my questions, nit in a video, weher at some point someone claims to have herad that dsomeone else has herd still another person claiming to have knowledge about a point or other.

Answer the question square and fair:

The court ruling (and I require you only one point) said it was an insurrection. Would you appeal or wouldn't you?

@metal-brain said
That cause of death was changed.
You don't know the whole story.
Watch the video.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/WvLOzhaH0SDl/

Is there any court case pending about her death?

Why not?

@ponderable said
I am interested in your answers to my questions, nit in a video, weher at some point someone claims to have herad that dsomeone else has herd still another person claiming to have knowledge about a point or other.

Answer the question square and fair:

The court ruling (and I require you only one point) said it was an insurrection. Would you appeal or wouldn't you?

What court ruling?
An FBI report stated it was not.

https://www.fbi.gov/news/testimony/examining-the-january-6-attack-on-the-us-capitol-wray-061521

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/exclusive-fbi-finds-scant-evidence-us-capitol-attack-was-coordinated-sources-2021-08-20/

@metal-brain said
What court ruling?
An FBI report stated it was not.

https://www.fbi.gov/news/testimony/examining-the-january-6-attack-on-the-us-capitol-wray-061521

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/exclusive-fbi-finds-scant-evidence-us-capitol-attack-was-coordinated-sources-2021-08-20/

The ruling I quoted. (Hint: first post gives the pdf of a court ruling. I even quoted a singel sentence.

The ruling:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22275517-ruling-on-couy-griffins-eligibility-to-run-for-officer

The subject is if Cuoy Griffins should be removed from office.

One sentnece in the ruling (and you are free to investigate the context if yiou think I misrepresented anything) is:

Applying these principles, the Court concludes that Mr. Griffin “engaged in” the January 6 insurrection.