The post that was quoted here has been removed
you don't necessarily agree with her, but she understands women's issues, huh
issues that she suggests might be better addressed not by someone competent, but by someone with the right genitals. how is this different than men suggesting women aren't fit for certain jobs.
i must admit though, the article doesn't seem to be all sexisms. it's much more an incoherent mess in which it doesn't say exactly what is that she wants.
"If Zahlanzi were not overflowing with arrogance, then he would not hasten to dismiss
the long, honest (partly self-critical) contribution by Zoe Williams as 'sexist crap'."
in other words, people are arrogant if they don't agree with you (or zoe? you already said YOU don't necessarily agree with her)