Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. 29 Jan '17 21:31
    Not an article, just a sexist thread to balance the Female counterpart.
  2. Standard member finnegan
    GENS UNA SUMUS
    29 Jan '17 21:35 / 3 edits
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Not an article, just a sexist thread to balance the Female counterpart.
    https://image.shutterstock.com/z/stock-vector-hand-drawn-bubble-speech-105992585.jpg
  3. 29 Jan '17 22:14
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Not an article, just a sexist thread to balance the Female counterpart.
    The nearly illiterate sexist troll Eladar's too idiotic to comprehend what my cited article means.
  4. 29 Jan '17 22:36
    Originally posted by Duchess64
    The nearly illiterate sexist troll Eladar's too idiotic to comprehend what my cited article means.
    i also think it's a sexist crap of an article. am i also illiterate sexist troll who is too idiotic to comprehend?
  5. 29 Jan '17 22:43 / 2 edits
    Originally posted by Zahlanzi
    i also think it's a sexist crap of an article. am i also illiterate sexist troll who is too idiotic to comprehend?
    Although I may not necessarily agree with her, Zoe Williams (who writes for the 'Guardian' )
    understands women's issues better than the extremely arrogant Zahlanzi, a man who
    has shown blindness to his own sexism in some earlier posts.

    If Zahlanzi were not overflowing with arrogance, then he would not hasten to dismiss
    the long, honest (partly self-critical) contribution by Zoe Williams as 'sexist crap'.
    .
  6. Subscriber Suzianne
    Misfit Queen
    29 Jan '17 23:03
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Not an article, just a sexist thread to balance the Female counterpart.
    So you didn't read the article, but instead chose to give a knee-jerk, moron response.

    Are you an Orangeman, too?
  7. 29 Jan '17 23:04
    Will we ever reach the point when people will not be judged by sex and women given special consideration?
  8. Subscriber Suzianne
    Misfit Queen
    29 Jan '17 23:10
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Will we ever reach the point when people will not be judged by sex and women given special consideration?
    Certainly not under "Trumplethinskin".
  9. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    29 Jan '17 23:14
    Originally posted by Eladar
    Will we ever reach the point when people will not be judged by sex and women given special consideration?
    I don't mind being judged on my sex: I'm wicked good at it!
  10. Subscriber FreakyKBH
    Acquired Taste...
    29 Jan '17 23:15
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    Certainly not under "Trumplethinskin".
    That is (surprisingly) funny.

    Carry on.
  11. 29 Jan '17 23:18 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by Suzianne to Eladar
    So you didn't read the article, but instead chose to give a knee-jerk, moron response.
    Are you an Orangeman, too?
    Some of my trolls have boasted that they are proud to 'thumb down' anything that I post without reading it.

    I don't care about Eladar being an Ulster Unionist.
  12. 29 Jan '17 23:32
    Originally posted by Duchess64
    Some of my trolls have boasted that they are proud to 'thumb down' anything that I post without reading it.

    I don't care about Eladar being an Ulster Unionist.
    What do you mean by Ulster Unionist? (Aside from the political party)?

    Have you also lived in Northern Ireland?
  13. 29 Jan '17 23:36 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by Ashiitaka
    What do you mean by Ulster Unionist? (Aside from the political party)?

    Have you also lived in Northern Ireland?
    My remark about Eladar being an 'Ulster Unionist' was a joke about Suzianne's usage of 'Orangeman'.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orange_Order

    "Politically, the Orange Order is a conservative British unionist organisation with links to Ulster loyalism"

    Whenever I come across 'Orange' mentioned in Western politics, I immediately think of
    the Orangemen of Northern Ireland or of the Netherlands's royal House of Orange-Nassau.
  14. 29 Jan '17 23:39 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by Duchess64
    My remark about Eladar being an 'Ulster Unionist' was a joke about Suzianne's usage of 'Orangeman'.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orange_Order

    "Politically, the Orange Order is a conservative British unionist organisation with links to Ulster loyalism"

    Whenever I come across 'Orange' mentioned in Western politics, I immediately think of
    the Orangemen of Northern Ireland or of the Netherlands's royal House of Orange-Nassau.
    I lived in Northern Ireland for a brief period, and I never actually knew about the orangemen.

    The DUP is the new unionist party, having supplanted the Ulsters.

    I have this weird fascination with monarchy, despite being opposed to it in practically every way. I guess I find it fascinating how many royals manage to cultivate this image that they are anything other than normal humans, and that people believe it.
  15. 29 Jan '17 23:40
    Originally posted by Duchess64
    Although I may not necessarily agree with her, Zoe Williams (who writes for the 'Guardian' )
    understands women's issues better than the extremely arrogant Zahlanzi, a man who
    has shown blindness to his own sexism in some earlier posts.

    If Zahlanzi were not overflowing with arrogance, then he would not hasten to dismiss
    the long, honest (partly self-critical) contribution by Zoe Williams as 'sexist crap'.
    .
    you don't necessarily agree with her, but she understands women's issues, huh

    issues that she suggests might be better addressed not by someone competent, but by someone with the right genitals. how is this different than men suggesting women aren't fit for certain jobs.

    i must admit though, the article doesn't seem to be all sexisms. it's much more an incoherent mess in which it doesn't say exactly what is that she wants.


    "If Zahlanzi were not overflowing with arrogance, then he would not hasten to dismiss
    the long, honest (partly self-critical) contribution by Zoe Williams as 'sexist crap'."
    in other words, people are arrogant if they don't agree with you (or zoe? you already said YOU don't necessarily agree with her)