President Obama recently referred to the Republican proposition to leave tax rates where they are all at for EVERYONE as being hostage takers. In other words, the Republicans insist that both rich and poor and meek and arrogant be left alone in terms of raising taxes above their current levels. So because the Democrats wish to raise taxes only on those they consider "rich", they are forced into making the decision to let the Republicans have their way to leave all Americans alone in terms of taxation or force all Americans to pay higher taxes.
I suppose painting them as terrorists is better than painting them as Nazi's, but if you ask me, the federal government is holding the entire country hostage and has been for some time. For example, do you all remember when we were told that TARP needed to be passed, or else? In short, a gun was pointed at the nations economic head if they did not give tax payer money to corporate America.
So should we equate those in Washington as terrorists or is this just over the top Obama drama? If they are terrorists, what should be done with them?
Originally posted by KazetNagorraTo me words are not really a big deal; I imagine it is just a poor word choice.
Figure of speech, whodey. Figure of speech.
However, it is noteworthy that many liberals do not look the other way if the poor word choice criticized issues near and dear to their hearts such as those which invoke images of slavery or questioned someone's sexual orientation.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraIf Obama says such things it is a figure of speech but if Whodey uses them then he is a looney bird. Do I have this right? In addition, does such inflammatory drival contribute to in any way?
Figure of speech, whodey. Figure of speech.
All I can say is that he welcomed to divide and conquer if he so wishes, and what a divided nation he has helped form.
Originally posted by whodeyIts stunning is it not whodey? Sarah Palin says "we got them in our sights" and these radical let wing progressive loons say she is inciting violence! No "figure of speech" when its a conservative!
If Obama says such things it is a figure of speech but if Whodey uses them then he is a looney bird. Do I have this right? In addition, does such inflammatory drival contribute to in any way?
All I can say is that he welcomed to divide and conquer if he so wishes, and what a divided nation he has helped form.
Originally posted by whodeyFor example, do you all remember when we were told that TARP needed to be passed, or else?
President Obama recently referred to the Republican proposition to leave tax rates where they are all at for EVERYONE as being hostage takers. In other words, the Republicans insist that both rich and poor and meek and arrogant be left alone in terms of raising taxes above their current levels. So because the Democrats wish to raise taxes only on those they ...[text shortened]... s this just over the top Obama drama? If they are terrorists, what should be done with them?
I seem to recall John Boehner pleading in tears…
Originally posted by utherpendragon“We got em in our sights!” Let me just say, as a lefty progressive—figure of speech! Geez.
Its stunning is it not whodey? Sarah Palin says "we got them in our sights" and these radical let wing progressive loons say she is inciting violence! No "figure of speech" when its a conservative!
Originally posted by utherpendragonWho are these unnamed left wing progressive loons you speak of?
Its stunning is it not whodey? Sarah Palin says "we got them in our sights" and these radical let wing progressive loons say she is inciting violence! No "figure of speech" when its a conservative!