Go back
Bad arguments: gun edition

Bad arguments: gun edition

Debates


@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
And somehow you continue to think you DON'T live in fear.
I have never pretended that . I do live in fear. I fear that a bad person could hurt my family and me. You have written about experiencing such violence, yet imply that you do not fear?

Vote Up
Vote Down


The post that was quoted here has been removed
You would enjoy killing people but we're the angry ones?

Vote Up
Vote Down


@athousandyoung said
You would enjoy killing people but we're the angry ones?
Yes, a guy uninvited in my house. I'll need six shots. You, a baby on a table, you'll just need your fingers. Hey, do you have any idea why the shallow person is so upset today? He is upset.


@averagejoe1 said
Yes, a guy uninvited in my house. I'll need six shots. You, a baby on a table, you'll just need your fingers. Hey, do you have any idea why the shallow person is so upset today? He is upset.
Are you schizophrenic? You keep posting word salad.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
I have never pretended that . I do live in fear. I fear that a bad person could hurt my family and me.
Well, then: you Republicans are self-confessedly worse cowards than any left-wing person on this planet.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
Yes, a guy uninvited in my house. I'll need six shots. You, a baby on a table, you'll just need your fingers. Hey, do you have any idea why the shallow person is so upset today? He is upset.
Living in your self-created nightmare world again, I see. My real world isn't nearly as bad. (Of course, in my world, my neighbours aren't gun-nuts like you.)

Vote Up
Vote Down

@shallow-blue said
Well, then: you Republicans are self-confessedly worse cowards than any left-wing person on this planet.
Left wing persons are afraid of bad words and anyone that has ideas contrary to theirs.
But they are totally brave about being able to defend their homes with their bare hands.
Or so they say.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@shallow-blue said
No, 2014. Not 1889.
OK, so two of the new FIDE Rules of Chess introduced in 2014, that Joe was completely ignorant of, are:

- It used to be true that after repeating the same position (not move, Joe - pay attention - your Joseph Stalin buddies in the USSR used to make the same mistake) three times, or when about to create such a repetition, either player could claim a draw. In 2014, a new rule was introduced that after five such repetitions, the arbiter could announce a draw without either player asking for it.
- Similarly, it used to be a rule that after 50 moves without either a pawn move, or a capture, either player could claim the draw. It is now also a rule that, should the players tediously not do so, the arbiter may impose the draw after 75 such moves.

See, Joe? The rules of chess change all the time. And you didn't even know of these! Betcha you don't realise realise that the 27th amendment to the Sacrosanct And Inviolate Constitution Of The Holy United States Of America was only ratified in 1992? Now, without looking it up on Pikiwedia or Rumble: when was it first introduced, boy?