@handyandy said<grin> and you are deeply in denial. LOL. Ever hear of google?
I seriously doubt that this Jurek individual has anything whatsoever to do with the Sanders campaign. You are beyond gullible.
@kazetnagorra saidAin't "learned" nothing yet except that the source is good LOL. And I heard a report of that screed being reported on a news radio broadcast today.
I'm sure that, like whodey, you'll learn from your mistake and try to be more critical of your sources in the future. Right?
stay in denial. it's better for your health. Gulags he says. Face facts, socialists!! We know what you are.
@earl-of-trumps saidThe whodey route. As expected. Let us know when the lizard people take over.
Ain't "learned" nothing yet except that the source is good LOL. And I heard a report of that screed being reported on a news radio broadcast today.
stay in denial. it's better for your health. Gulags he says. Face facts, socialists!! We know what you are.
@kazetnagorra saidWould anyone say that Bernie is a 'Great American"?
The whodey route. As expected. Let us know when the lizard people take over.
@earl-of-trumps saidThey just don't want anyone to be able to shoot back is all.
LOL I wonder where the gun-grabbing socialist got *his* rifle??? Think about it. They don't want guns banned for SOCIALISTS, that's for damn sure.
@earl-of-trumps saidGoogle is your source? Well then, it must be true. Google wouldn't lie.
<grin> and you are deeply in denial. LOL. Ever hear of google?
Just to be sure though, check it out with whodey.
[P.S. Do you <grin> and salivate at the same time?]
@handyandy saidwhat I meant by google is you can google it and get your *own* account.
Google is your source? Well then, it must be true. Google wouldn't lie.
Just to be sure though, check it out with whodey.
[P.S. Do you <grin> and salivate at the same time?]
it's out there
1 edit
@earl-of-trumps saidAnd you, yes YOU, have been repeatedly, laughably, wrong in your assertions.
Ya see, O'Keefe, was trying to shame Jurek (I presume).
Just to be clear here, it is ME, not O'Keefe, that is making the bodacious claim that Jurek is hardly alone. That's all on me, Suzie.
I have repeatedly in here, pointed to the violent nature of socialists and their insatiable appetite for power going back sine negative infinity.
Case in point, you saw ...[text shortened]... merica have
Have a nice day.
PS: Keep an eye open for that pending libel suit by Jurek <smile>
But to be clear, we're used to that.
As to Kavanaugh, it is also clear that he is not fit to be on the Supreme Court, yet the Senators confirmed him anyways. This proves the decay of honor and respectability that pervades the Senate today, with the Republicans in charge. The "left", as you put it, is just fighting the baked-in corruption of "Moscow" Mitch and the Republican Party, including his stealing Obama's lawful pick of Merrick Garland to sanctify Gorsuch, instead.
And, just so I'm clear, wtf is the "SJC"? I'm guessing you mean the Supreme Court?
@earl-of-trumps saidThen you're clearly as whacked as Jurek.
Ain't "learned" nothing yet except that the source is good LOL. And I heard a report of that screed being reported on a news radio broadcast today.
stay in denial. it's better for your health. Gulags he says. Face facts, socialists!! We know what you are.
2 edits
@Suzianne And you, yes YOU, have been repeatedly, laughably, wrong in your assertions.
You're so full of crap your eyes are brown. And I alone have corrected you so many times, you must have run out of white-out by now.
S: As to Kavanaugh, it is also clear that he is not fit to be on the Supreme Court, yet the Senators confirmed him anyways.
And why is that, because he is not a liberal? who the hell are you kidding? this guy led his classmates in QPA in every year he attended college. "not fit" - what an arse.
S: This proves the decay of honor and respectability that pervades the Senate today, with the Republicans in charge. The "left", as you put it, is just fighting the baked-in corruption of "Moscow" Mitch and the Republican Party, including his stealing Obama's lawful pick of Merrick Garland to sanctify Gorsuch, instead.
Let me get you a crying towel, you poor deprived democrat.
S: And, just so I'm clear, wtf is the "SJC"? I'm guessing you mean the Supreme Court?
Can you be this obtuse?? Geeeezus. Supreme Judicial Court, which is what it is most commonly known by. Gad. And you think I am wrong in here.? you have ballz.
1 edit
@earl-of-trumps said1. You may have tried to correct me, but you are so utterly devoid of facts that you fail. And I have blue eyes.
@Suzianne And you, yes YOU, have been repeatedly, laughably, wrong in your assertions.
You're so full of crap your eyes are brown. And I alone have corrected you so many times, you must have run out of white-out by now.
S: As to Kavanaugh, it is also clear that he is not fit to be on the Supreme Court, yet the Senators confirmed him anyways.
...[text shortened]... which is what it is most commonly known by. Gad. And you think I am wrong in here.? you have ballz.
2. Why is that? Being guilty of sexual assault should make one unfit for ANY public office. That goes double for your poo-throwing monkey with a tie three sizes too long.
3. It's literally the least you could do after supporting all the animals in the Republican Party.
4. I have never heard the Supreme Court called the "Supreme Judicial Court" in my 4 decades as an American on this planet.
And yes, you're usually wrong. See #3 above.
@handyandy saidI googled his name yesterday. What I noticed was that exactly no reputable news media were covering it. Until they do I'm filing it under probably fake news.
Google is your source? Well then, it must be true. Google wouldn't lie.
Just to be sure though, check it out with whodey.
[P.S. Do you <grin> and salivate at the same time?]
@earl-of-trumps saidHe's not one of "mine". Unlike you, I don't support people so full of hate and fear.
Jurek is one of YOURS, SuzieQ.
I'm not.
Again, that is, IF he said what you claim.