People will have to be rationed to four modest portions of meat and one liter of milk a week if the world is to avoid run-away climate change, a major new report warns. Since man-made "global warming" is a fairy tale, I say: Bollocks! Discuss.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/sep/30/food.ethicalliving
Originally posted by der schwarze Ritterkeep walking the streets with your "Global warming is a myth" sandwich board.
People will have to be rationed to four modest portions of meat and one liter of milk a week if the world is to avoid run-away climate change, a major new report warns. Since man-made "global warming" is a fairy tale, I say: Bollocks! Discuss.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/sep/30/food.ethicalliving
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterIs this your way of turning the conversation to sweetbreads?
People will have to be rationed to four modest portions of meat and one liter of milk a week if the world is to avoid run-away climate change, a major new report warns. Since man-made "global warming" is a fairy tale, I say: Bollocks! Discuss.
Originally posted by howardgeeEvidently you and the Food Climate Research Network are the ones in denial -- we're in a period of global cooling:
keep walking the streets with your "Global warming is a myth" sandwich board.
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2008/09/28/global-cooling-sign-solar-winds-at-50-year-low.aspx
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterAre you aware that factors such as solar winds have been included in current climate models? Solar winds will always fluctuate, but do not affect the overall picture that singificantly.
Evidently you and the Food Climate Research Network are the ones in denial -- we're in a period of global cooling:
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2008/09/28/global-cooling-sign-solar-winds-at-50-year-low.aspx
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterThey're not supposed to prove anything, they are predictions based on current data. They're pretty reliable too.
Are you aware that climate models haven't proven anything...ever?
http://environmentalresearchweb.org/cws/article/research/30501
Originally posted by mrstabbyThe weathermen (the real ones, not Obama's pal William Ayers) can't even predict if it's going to rain this weekend and you think they're able to predict 100 years in the future what the weather will be like across the whole planet? I've got a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell you!
They're not supposed to prove anything, they are predictions based on current data. They're pretty reliable too.
http://environmentalresearchweb.org/cws/article/research/30501
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterWeather and climate are two separate things. I suggest you read up on this and learn the difference between long term and short term.
The weathermen (the real ones, not Obama's pal William Ayers) can't even predict if it's going to rain this weekend and you think they're able to predict 100 years in the future what the weather will be like across the whole planet? I've got a bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell you!
By the way, weather prediction nowadays is accurate enough for energy companies to use their data to predict demand.
Originally posted by mrstabbySo you're saying that power companies use climate modeling to predict energy demand? Do you have a link or study?
Weather and climate are two separate things. I suggest you read up on this and learn the difference between long term and short term.
By the way, weather prediction nowadays is accurate enough for energy companies to use their data to predict demand.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterYes
So you're saying that power companies use climate modeling to predict energy demand? Do you have a link or study?
https://publicaffairs.llnl.gov/news/news_releases/2008/NR-08-03-05.html
Weather predictions are also used
http://www.dtnmeteorlogix.com/energy/gas.cfm