The subjects are quite boring these days, probably ecause you libs introeuce nothing new, except maybe defending profanity of the lock-step libs today,,,,(all at once, isn't that a coincidence...).
But while you push for profanity, my child in the room saw and heard it, and said how ugly the crockett woman was, it was fantastic. A repub in the making. She asked what I thought, and I said I cannot see the creature due to all the makeup and wig-hat and vision-fiasco, so can't comment on what she might look like.
So, since y'all have nothing, I thought I would remind you of Biden's $45B Broadband project, to get internet to the poor....It Connected NOT ONE Person To the Internet, but cost us $45B. Go get 'em, Musk.
Now you have something to talk about. Been getting boring, don't you know. Sue's one-liners have me in stitches, though. Here is a Primer for you....
https://www.washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/the-42-billion-internet-program-that-has-connected-0-people
I guess you all know by now, that, well I'll be gol-dogged, Musk is showing what they have done. Up to now, DOGE has saved $804 for each of us. That will cover the lingering inflation.....Cool, huh?
Now Wildgrass, Sonhouse, et al, will not be saying to show what DOGE has done. But, alas, Next they will be saying...."Well, show us the pile of money that they have found', the usual silliness. Boring.
@AverageJoe1 saidBS. IF you read your own article (something you apparently rarely do), you'd know that implementation of the program wasn't due until 2026. And nowhere near $42 billion has been actually spent mostly because few States have even completed the steps necessary. https://www.internetforall.gov/bead-progress-dashboard
The subjects are quite boring these days, probably ecause you libs introeuce nothing new, except maybe defending profanity of the lock-step libs today,,,,(all at once, isn't that a coincidence...).
But while you push for profanity, my child in the room saw and heard it, and said how ugly the crockett woman was, it was fantastic. A repub in the making. She asked wha ...[text shortened]... washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/the-42-billion-internet-program-that-has-connected-0-people
You're not only gullible, but incredibly lazy not to read your own links.
@AverageJoe1 saidNo surprise the Trump administration has altered the program for corrupt purposes:
The subjects are quite boring these days, probably ecause you libs introeuce nothing new, except maybe defending profanity of the lock-step libs today,,,,(all at once, isn't that a coincidence...).
But while you push for profanity, my child in the room saw and heard it, and said how ugly the crockett woman was, it was fantastic. A repub in the making. She asked wha ...[text shortened]... washingtonpolicy.org/publications/detail/the-42-billion-internet-program-that-has-connected-0-people
"Shortly after the Wall Street Journal reported Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was plotting BEAD changes, the Department of Commerce confirmed the news with a brief but straight-to-the-point press release.
“Under my leadership, the Commerce Department has launched a rigorous review of the BEAD program. The Department is ripping out the Biden Administration’s pointless requirements,” said Lutnick. “It is revamping the BEAD program to take a tech-neutral approach that is rigorously driven by outcomes, so states can provide internet access for the lowest cost.”
"Presumably, this means BEAD’s fiber preference will go away so that more of the program’s $42.5 billion will go towards providers of fixed wireless access (FWA) and low-earth orbit (LEO) satellite service. Elon Musk’s Starlink could potentially receive $10-20 billion in funds, sources told the WSJ."
https://www.fierce-network.com/broadband/whats-new-bead-heres-what-we-know-so-far
@no1marauder saidYou say stuff like this, good or bad, true or false, but with all this that you
BS. IF you read your own article (something you apparently rarely do), you'd know that implementation of the program wasn't due until 2026. And nowhere near $42 billion has been actually spent mostly because few States have even completed the steps necessary. https://www.internetforall.gov/bead-progress-dashboard
You're not only gullible, but incredibly lazy not to read your own links.
'uncover', how is it that Trump was elected, Trump ratings continue to climb, he has opened up an interest in everything, he has a lot of irons in the fire to Make us Great. A lot of irons. Do you think if the Broadband was his doing that it would still be sitting idle?
Creates interest in things, indeed. Because of his busy genius ideas, we now have China and Russia interested in taking Greenland. NOW, Marauder, Now, you see why I have said he should NOT tell us what he is doing, as transparent as he is, because he has China, Russia and You possibly upsetting his long-range plans. You will have us competing for Greenland instead of just buying it, or whatever his plan is.
I'm not worried though. After all, this is Trump. What if it were Kamala. A Jamaican who would build a runway in Jamaica for AirForce1 on her days off.
Uhoh, its saturday, I will die if Trump plays golf today.