@no1marauder saidyou avoided my question…
You seem to think that the only agreements that are "legal" are those that are written.
That is not, and has never been, the law.
“ If a deal has been offered but never “memorialized” is legal, what is the need to “memorialize” any deal? ”
1 edit
never mind, I found the answer. There was no legal agreement according to PA law.
“ Instead, “such immunity can be conferred only upon strict compliance with Pennsylvania’s immunity statute, which is codified at 42 Pa.C.S. § 5947,” and which requires the court’s express permission. None of this occurred. Worse, Castor waffled on whether he intended to grant transactional immunity or use immunity, undermining the notion that a binding agreement was reached.”
https://thebulwark.com/this-guy-is-the-reason-bill-cosby-is-out-of-prison/
@mott-the-hoople saidThe point is irrelevant since no one claims there was an "immunity deal".
never mind, I found the answer. There was no legal agreement according to PA law.
“ Instead, “such immunity can be conferred only upon strict compliance with Pennsylvania’s immunity statute, which is codified at 42 Pa.C.S. § 5947,” and which requires the court’s express permission. None of this occurred. Worse, Castor waffled on whether he intended to grant ...[text shortened]... greement was reached.”
https://thebulwark.com/this-guy-is-the-reason-bill-cosby-is-out-of-prison/
@no1marauder saidyou are a fool!
The point is irrelevant since no one claims there was an "immunity deal".