Go back
Blm/antifa

Blm/antifa

Debates


@Suzianne said
You quoted me. Stop lying.
Page 3


@mike69 said
Like your genetic reject budde?
Non sequitur.

And also, non sense.


@Suzianne said
Non sequitur.

And also, non sense.
Like the huge majority of things you say. I don’t even think Easter egg hair would help


@mike69 said
Page 3
All I see in that post is you quoting Google AI.


@Suzianne said
All I see in that post is you quoting Google AI.
Your honesty as usual is unsurpassed


@Earl-of-Trumps said
@wildgrass said - " A priest walking down the street shot in the head with an ICE pepper ball. A person standing there
talking to an officer who pulls out pepper spray and empties the whole canister in their face"

And how do you know that those videos are not AI?
Because they're not. These things can be verified. The person was interviewed. It's not really that difficult to tell, but it seems like only the right wing is being fooled by AI.


@wildgrass said
Because they're not. These things can be verified. The person was interviewed. It's not really that difficult to tell, but it seems like only the right wing is being fooled by AI.
I will agree, the democrats lead the world in fakery 😆


@Earl-of-Trumps said
I will agree, the democrats lead the world in fakery 😆
Nah, y'all are fooling yourselves. The antifa "riot" videos you think are real come from AI platforms run by right wingers.


@Earl-of-Trumps said
I will agree, the democrats lead the world in fakery 😆
Whereas the Republicans lead the world in destruction (physical, psychological, and social) and disregard for the rule of law.

1 edit

@Earl-of-Trumps said
@wildgrass said - " A priest walking down the street shot in the head with an ICE pepper ball. A person standing there
talking to an officer who pulls out pepper spray and empties the whole canister in their face"

And how do you know that those videos are not AI?
A valid question, but if any on-the-spot video (and not just "words words words" ) can be dismissed as AI -- then where does that leave us?


@Arkturos said
A valid question, but if any on-the-spot video (and not just "words words words" ) can be dismissed as AI -- then where does that leave us?
In a world of hurt, I'm afraid

1 edit

@Earl-of-Trumps said
In a world of hurt, I'm afraid
I don't know how to help except to agree and commiserate.

Things are going unexpectedly wrong on this planet (or at least in the USA, which still affects the rest of the planet).

WTAH!!!

I gather you are older than me, but I'm approaching 66 and therefore was a teenager in the 1970s.

Never expected the devolution into broadcast and normalized brainstem behavior.


@Earl-of-Trumps said
In a world of hurt, I'm afraid
It's almost as if Stalin and his fearful minions had AI at their disposal.


@Arkturos said
A valid question, but if any on-the-spot video (and not just "words words words" ) can be dismissed as AI -- then where does that leave us?
Actually, all you need is independent verification. The priest who was pepper sprayed is on record with a statement and media interview. Or, some analysis showing the validity or fabrication of the video in question. Most AI platforms have watermarks now that are visible by inspection (although it can be cheated).

Trust but verify. This has been true for a billion years, you can see it in the eyes of a wild rabbit. Apparently the internet made us soft. Mott The Hoople is willing to trust any rando on his Facebook feed just because the posted video gives his brain a dopamine rush. No discipline.

1 edit

@Arkturos said
A valid question, but if any on-the-spot video (and not just "words words words" ) can be dismissed as AI -- then where does that leave us?
We would all be like liberals then 😉