Bob Herbert calls it, on Afghanistan

Bob Herbert calls it, on Afghanistan

Debates

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
27 Jun 10

maybe we should move the base, first.

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
27 Jun 10

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/30/world/asia/30mumbai.html?_r=1

Militant Network Is Intact Long After Mumbai Siege

By LYDIA POLGREEN and SOUAD MEKHENNET
Published: September 29, 2009

KARACHI, Pakistan — Ten months after the devastating attacks in Mumbai by Pakistan-based militants, the group behind the assault remains largely intact and determined to strike India again, according to current and former members of the group, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and intelligence officials.

...

Pakistan’s chief spy agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence directorate, or ISI, helped create Lashkar two decades ago to challenge Indian control in Kashmir, the disputed territory that lies at the heart of the conflict between the nuclear-armed neighbors.

Pakistani officials say that after Sept. 11, 2001, they broke their contacts with the group. No credible evidence has emerged of Pakistani government involvement in the Mumbai attacks, according to an American law enforcement official.

But a senior American intelligence official said the ISI was believed to maintain ties with Lashkar. Four Lashkar members, interviewed individually, said only a thin distance separated Lashkar and the ISI, bridged by former ISI and military officials.

One highly placed Lashkar militant said the Mumbai attackers were part of groups trained by former Pakistani military and intelligence officials at Lashkar camps. Others had direct knowledge that retired army and ISI officials trained Lashkar recruits as late as last year.

“Some people of the ISI knew about the plan and closed their eyes,” said one senior Lashkar operative in Karachi who said he had met some of the gunmen before they left for the Mumbai assault, though he did not know what their mission would be.

...

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
27 Jun 10

Originally posted by zeeblebot
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/30/world/asia/30mumbai.html?_r=1

Militant Network Is Intact Long After Mumbai Siege

By LYDIA POLGREEN and SOUAD MEKHENNET
Published: September 29, 2009

KARACHI, Pakistan — Ten months after the devastating attacks in Mumbai by Pakistan-based militants, the group behind the assault remains largely intact and determin ...[text shortened]... ore they left for the Mumbai assault, though he did not know what their mission would be.

...
The other side of the coin:

http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/india-is-supporting-taliban-against-pakistan-says-us-intelligence-official/

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
27 Jun 10

Originally posted by no1marauder
The other side of the coin:

http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/02/19/india-is-supporting-taliban-against-pakistan-says-us-intelligence-official/
spring is over, what happened?

--------------

...

The Post report, sourced initially to unnamed Pakistani officials, could be interpreted as an effort by Pakistan to prevent Indian actions against the country that some U.S. military analysts predict are likely before Indian elections this spring.

“The Indians are almost certainly going to do something before [their] elections,” said AEI military analyst Thomas Donnelly. “They will strike camps in Pakistan. They are really pissed about the incompetence of the response to the [Mumbai] attacks. …. It doesn’t look like the Pakistanis are willing to or even can do anything that will satisfy the Indians. I would really be surprised if something doesn’t happen, unless that changes. They got an election coming up in March or April. It will be an interesting test for the United States.”

...

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
27 Jun 10

Originally posted by zeeblebot
spring is over, what happened?

--------------

...

The Post report, sourced initially to unnamed Pakistani officials, could be interpreted as an effort by Pakistan to prevent Indian actions against the country that some U.S. military analysts predict are likely before Indian elections this spring.

“The Indians are almost certainly going to do so ...[text shortened]... ction coming up in March or April. It will be an interesting test for the United States.”

...
Apparently there's been ongoing negotiations (though the Indian official doesn't look all that happy about shaking hands):

http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2010/06/22/india-and-pakistan-yet-again-past-is-prologue/

silicon valley

Joined
27 Oct 04
Moves
101289
27 Jun 10

diplomats are good for something. now how about they work on our own problem with Pakistan?