@averagejoe1 saidOr how about how there is an extensive list of freeware independently created programs and games available on an Android but which Apple blocks
Man, I would not let that be the deciding factor by any stretch. Charging the phone? They're a few on-board apps and features which lessen drain. Just low-power mode is great, but the list goes on. Full day charge with no problem.
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidMarauder is doing his best, true to form. He is saying that Bragg knows he can use the exception, and sit back watching the defense. But if it is a slam dunk for Bragg, you see, the defense attorneys would not even bother putting this exception in the court record. But they are saying every day that Bragg must abide by the statute and has no charge to try.
you are looking likea fool little man
If Marauder thinks it is a slam dunk, then why would not the defense lawyers see that?
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidRelying on batteries has significant drawbacks. Do you buy battery powered firearms too?
By earphones do y'all mean a wire from phone to ears? iPods are magic and require no wire. I have never had a need to plug a wire into the phone. I must be missing what you are talking about?
1 edit
@athousandyoung said
Relying on batteries has significant drawbacks. Do you buy battery powered firearms too?
[youtube BioWare gun]2cRm9BMxl90[/youtube]
Snoop:
Yeah, man. Man say if you wanna shoot nails, this here the Cadillac, man. Meant Lexus but he ain't know it.
Chris:
Hold a charge better?
Snoop:
Man, f*** a charge, this here's a gun powder activated, 27 caliber, full auto, no kickback, nail-throwing mayhem man.
(^they were upset because their nail gun kept running out of batteries right when they needed it)
@athousandyoung saidThanks, I was having a hard time understanding what he was saying, Do you have a video recording, maybe I could do better if I hear the words, or the pronunciations of the words, at least. You know, what he say.
[youtube The Wire scene]JDpvkwBBu6U[/youtube]Snoop:
Yeah, man. Man say if you wanna shoot nails, this here the Cadillac, man. Meant Lexus but he ain't know it.
Chris:
Hold a charge better?
Snoop:
Man, f*** a charge, this here's a gun powder activated, 27 caliber, full auto, no kickback, nail-throwing mayhem man.
(^they were upset because their nail gun kept running out of batteries right when they needed it)
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidI'm giving you the law, I'm sorry if the paid propagandists you rely on aren't.
Marauder is doing his best, true to form. He is saying that Bragg knows he can use the exception, and sit back watching the defense. But if it is a slam dunk for Bragg, you see, the defense attorneys would not even bother putting this exception in the court record. But they are saying every day that Bragg must abide by the statute and has no charge to try.
If Marauder thinks it is a slam dunk, then why would not the defense lawyers see that?
No actual motions have been filed yet, but generally defense lawyers put in any that have a plausible basis. So I expect Trump's lawyers to do the same. 99% of the time pre-trial motions to dismiss are denied, but you never know and there's no risk in filing them.
@averagejoe1 saidthe defense lawyers cant see because of the tears in their eyes from laughing
Marauder is doing his best, true to form. He is saying that Bragg knows he can use the exception, and sit back watching the defense. But if it is a slam dunk for Bragg, you see, the defense attorneys would not even bother putting this exception in the court record. But they are saying every day that Bragg must abide by the statute and has no charge to try.
If Marauder thinks it is a slam dunk, then why would not the defense lawyers see that?
@mott-the-hoople saidI hope you like the taste of crow because both you dimwits will be eating plenty of it when the legal case proceeds exactly as I have outlined.
the defense lawyers cant see because of the tears in their eyes from laughing
@no1marauder saidI do appreciate your eloquent stab at a bit of humor
I hope you like the taste of crow because both you dimwits will be eating plenty of it when the legal case proceeds exactly as I have outlined.
@no1marauder saidshould we go ahead and get the rope ready?
I hope you like the taste of crow because both you dimwits will be eating plenty of it when the legal case proceeds exactly as I have outlined.
@mott-the-hoople saidMarauder is couching his phrasing, such that if we are proven right, he will be able to say that he was not saying it is 'for sure' that the statute will not apply,,,,,only that it may be a defense.
should we go ahead and get the rope ready?
But we see through that ploy!!!
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidI'll say that any motion to dismiss based on the Statute of Limitations will be denied.
Marauder is couching his phrasing, such that if we are proven right, he will be able to say that he was not saying it is 'for sure' that the statute will not apply,,,,,only that it may be a defense.
But we see through that ploy!!!
Do you want to claim it won't?
In the meantime, here's some homework for you to study on Pretrial Motions in Criminal cases in New York: https://nysba.org/NYSBA/Sections/Coursebooks/Young%20Lawyers/2019%20Trial%20Academy/Mitchell%20Motions%20CLE%20Final%20updated%202.pdf
Please note:
E. C.P.L. § 210.20 PRETRIAL DISMISSAL MOTIONS-FELONIES
A motion to dismiss an indictment or a count thereof can be made on the following
grounds: ..........................................
vi. The prosecution is barred by the statute of limitations. See, CPL § 30.10
1 edit
@no1marauder saidwow…we are so impressed 😂
In the meantime, here's some homework for you to study on Pretrial Motions in Criminal cases in New York: https://nysba.org/NYSBA/Sections/Coursebooks/Young%20Lawyers/2019%20Trial%20Academy/Mitchell%20Motions%20CLE%20Final%20updated%202.pdf
Please note:
E. C.P.L. § 210.20 PRETRIAL DISMISSAL MOTIONS-FELONIES
A motion to dismiss an indictment or a count thereof ca ...[text shortened]... ...................
vi. The prosecution is barred by the statute of limitations. See, CPL § 30.10
not laughing with you little man, laughing @ you 😂
1 edit
@no1marauder saidI claim it will not be denied....if there is such a motion.
I'll say that any motion to dismiss based on the Statute of Limitations will be denied.
Do you want to claim it won't?