Brandolini’s law

you can look up the law here:

https://www.nature.com/articles/540171a

be aware that it contains a swear word.

In fact I think that "one" order of magnitude is far below what we have on this Forum.

https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/science/censorship-is-a-threat-to-science.191679

@ponderable said
you can look up the law here:

https://www.nature.com/articles/540171a

be aware that it contains a swear word.

In fact I think that "one" order of magnitude is far below what we have on this Forum.

@metal-brain said
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/science/censorship-is-a-threat-to-science.191679

@suzianne said
Squashing misinformation is not censorship.

I've gone over this with you in the Science forum. The scientific method is all you need to know about squashing misinformation. If a paper has been subjected to the scientific method and been refined, it's not misinformation. But if there is no scientific method employed and the data instead came out of someone's ass, then it is misinformation and should never see the light of day. This is science, it is not censorship.

@suzianne said
Squashing misinformation is not censorship.

I've gone over this with you in the Science forum. The scientific method is all you need to know about squashing misinformation. If a paper has been subjected to the scientific method and been refined, it's not misinformation. But if there is no scientific method employed and the data instead came out of someone's ass, then it is misinformation and should never see the light of day. This is science, it is not censorship.

@metal-brain said
Time dilation causes gravity.
Would you censor that statement?

Bring your mind to the Sparrow.

@ponderable said
you can look up the law here:

https://www.nature.com/articles/540171a

be aware that it contains a swear word.

In fact I think that "one" order of magnitude is far below what we have on this Forum.

@metal-brain said
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/science/censorship-is-a-threat-to-science.191679