Go back
Brandolini’s law

Brandolini’s law

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down
Vote Up
3
Vote Down

you can look up the law here:

https://www.nature.com/articles/540171a

be aware that it contains a swear word.

In fact I think that "one" order of magnitude is far below what we have on this Forum.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/science/censorship-is-a-threat-to-science.191679

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-2

@ponderable said
you can look up the law here:

https://www.nature.com/articles/540171a

be aware that it contains a swear word.

In fact I think that "one" order of magnitude is far below what we have on this Forum.
“be aware that it contains a swear word”

LMFAO

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@metal-brain said
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/science/censorship-is-a-threat-to-science.191679
Squashing misinformation is not censorship.

I've gone over this with you in the Science forum. The scientific method is all you need to know about squashing misinformation. If a paper has been subjected to the scientific method and been refined, it's not misinformation. But if there is no scientific method employed and the data instead came out of someone's ass, then it is misinformation and should never see the light of day. This is science, it is not censorship.

Vote Up
2
Vote Down
-3

@suzianne said
Squashing misinformation is not censorship.

I've gone over this with you in the Science forum. The scientific method is all you need to know about squashing misinformation. If a paper has been subjected to the scientific method and been refined, it's not misinformation. But if there is no scientific method employed and the data instead came out of someone's ass, then it is misinformation and should never see the light of day. This is science, it is not censorship.
Uhhhhh, Suzy, the word is 'quash', don't embarrass yourself

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

@suzianne said
Squashing misinformation is not censorship.

I've gone over this with you in the Science forum. The scientific method is all you need to know about squashing misinformation. If a paper has been subjected to the scientific method and been refined, it's not misinformation. But if there is no scientific method employed and the data instead came out of someone's ass, then it is misinformation and should never see the light of day. This is science, it is not censorship.
Time dilation causes gravity.
Would you censor that statement?

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

@metal-brain said
Time dilation causes gravity.
Would you censor that statement?
Like I've told divegeester, you are free to make a fool out of yourself.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Bring your mind to the Sparrow.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@ponderable said
you can look up the law here:

https://www.nature.com/articles/540171a

be aware that it contains a swear word.

In fact I think that "one" order of magnitude is far below what we have on this Forum.
The problem is, it is so tiring.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/science/censorship-is-a-threat-to-science.191679
Perfectly proving Ponderable's point, providentially.