Originally posted by sh76Come to think of it [which I do], maybe it's a set up by the Iranians to demonstrate - to hardliners and/or ultra social conservatives at home - that, by rejecting Brazil's intervention, Iran is impervious to foreign pressure - something that might have been questioned when Iran 'compromised' over the nuclear deal - arguably in the face of international pressure.
Not that it's a bad idea, of course.
Originally posted by FMFThis must be one of the rare occasions when Lula actually does something that is truly worthy of praise. To answer your question, I'd say that is morally correct thing to do, yes.
[quote]Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has called on Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to allow a woman sentenced in Iran to death by stoning to accept an offer of asylum in Brazil, local media reported.
The sentence imposed on Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani for an extra-marital relationship, which she denies, has caused an international outcry. ...[text shortened]... pens its doors unconditinally to Iranians seeking asylum from their nation's theocracy?
Originally posted by FMFWhere is your sense of humor man?
And so possibly face being sentenced to 99 lashes or even being stoned to death? Your 'gag' lacks an ironic angle or oblique insight. You have missed the point of the OP. Should the world unconditionally welcome any and all Iranians seeking asylum?
Yes they should be allowed asylum. I would be shocked, however, if they were allowed asylum.