Go back
British passports

British passports

Debates

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120562
Clock
22 Mar 18
2 edits

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/22/contract-to-print-uk-passports-abroad-will-save-120m

“”Matt Hancock, the culture secretary, sought to blame EU regulations on procurement. He told a Westminster reporters’ lunch: “There is an irony, which is these rules are European rules and we are going to be leaving the European Union and then we may be able to – if we choose to – set out our own procurement rules.””

I’m choosing to post the Guardian’s willy-rubbing coverage of this interesting news, as it is a nice representation of thier crappy editorial policy.

Firstly, it is excellent to see the UK continuing to strike business deals with our European cousins, irrespective of what idiots like Priti Patel have to say about it. Who gives a monkey’s bollock if it’s passport blanks...so bloody what!

But the interesting thing for me is the Guardian quote from above...so and so “sought to blame EU regulations”... yes that right, because the UK is honouring it’s commitment to those procurement regulations you bloody idiot.

JEEZ.

Ashiitaka

RSA

Joined
20 Oct 16
Moves
11569
Clock
22 Mar 18

Originally posted by @divegeester
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/22/contract-to-print-uk-passports-abroad-will-save-120m

[i]“”Matt Hancock, the culture secretary, sought to blame EU regulations on procurement. He told a Westminster reporters’ lunch: “There is an irony, which is these rules are European rules and we are going to be leaving the European Union and then we ...[text shortened]... the UK is honouring it’s commitment to those procurement regulations you bloody idiot.

JEEZ.
Yes, exactly. The tender went out. A French firm won the tender as it offered the least costly manufacturing process. That's how tenders work. If the government acted any differently, it would be economically nonsensical. We don't have 120 million to throw around just for the sake of snubbing France - that's just childish.

Looks like the British company thought they could bank on the government to pick them so they didn't bother to offer a good price. Oopsy - poopsy, better luck next time. Tough lesson in business.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120562
Clock
22 Mar 18
2 edits

Originally posted by @ashiitaka
Yes, exactly. The tender went out. A French firm won the tender as it offered the least costly manufacturing process. That's how tenders work. If the government acted any differently, it would be economically nonsensical. We don't have 120 million to throw around just for the sake of snubbing France - that's just childish.

Looks like the British compa ...[text shortened]... t bother to offer a good price. Oopsy - poopsy, better luck next time. Tough lesson in business.
The owner of the British company was whining on the radio this morning about various MPs coming to his factory and meeting his “dedicated” staff. I heard myself saying out loud “shut the f*** up!”... it’s a competitive marketplace and it’s going to get more competive outside of Europe after Brexit. Competition is a good thing.

Ashiitaka

RSA

Joined
20 Oct 16
Moves
11569
Clock
22 Mar 18
1 edit

Originally posted by @divegeester
The owner of the British company was whining on the radio this morning about various MPs coming to his factory and meeting his “dedicated” staff. I heard myself saying out loud “shut the f*** up, it’s a competitive marketplace and it’s going to get more competive outside of Europe after Brexit”. Competition is a good thing.
Cash is king. Did the owner think that Spreadsheet Phil (famous for being a superb accountant) would throw away 120 000 000 pounds for no reason when the NHS is struggling and we have austerity? Come now.

Competition is the engine of prosperity. Without it, we get lazy and arrogant. If I were the owner, I would be saying "this is a terrible loss, we will immediately review our manufacturing process and see if we can cut costs".

mchill
Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3283
Clock
23 Mar 18
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @divegeester
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/22/contract-to-print-uk-passports-abroad-will-save-120m

[i]“”Matt Hancock, the culture secretary, sought to blame EU regulations on procurement. He told a Westminster reporters’ lunch: “There is an irony, which is these rules are European rules and we are going to be leaving the European Union and then we ...[text shortened]... the UK is honouring it’s commitment to those procurement regulations you bloody idiot.

JEEZ.
I’m choosing to post the Guardian’s willy-rubbing coverage of this interesting news

Who gives a monkey’s bollock if it’s passport blanks...so bloody what!





😀

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
23 Mar 18
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I'm waiting for someone to post a fake news scare that the French company is engineering a back-door hack into the UK passport data chips...



Oops, I just did.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.