https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49914704
If the US president can use the word bullsh.., surely then there’s no more reason for RHP to ban the word.
Anyhoo. Read the article.
Not for the substance, but for the dire warning the BBC gives us:
“Warning: this report contains strong language.”
Well, with a warning like that, I reckoned trump had went off on a drunken Scot bender of f’s, b’s and c’s...
But no. Just a bit of BS.
03 Oct 19
@shavixmir
I read that too - very disappointing.
Didn't realise bovine faeces were banned here. Odd when it's quicker to type BS.
03 Oct 19
@wolfgang59 saidReminds me of my daughter. She keeps saying OMG!
@shavixmir
I read that too - very disappointing.
Didn't realise bovine faeces were banned here. Odd when it's quicker to type BS.
So I asked why and she said: “It’s shorter than saying Oh My God.”
I tried explaining that it may be shorter typing, but not speaking.
“No dad. More letters: it’s longer.”
I think my daughter needs a good belting...
03 Oct 19
@shavixmir saidUse an obi, it's shorter.
Reminds me of my daughter. She keeps saying OMG!
So I asked why and she said: “It’s shorter than saying Oh My God.”
I tried explaining that it may be shorter typing, but not speaking.
“No dad. More letters: it’s longer.”
I think my daughter needs a good belting...
03 Oct 19
3 edits
@shavixmir saidSir, just because our beloved President talks like a foul mouthed 8 year old, doesn't mean the rest of us have to. Please don't lower yourself to his level, I know you have more class than that. 🙂
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49914704
If the US president can use the word bullsh.., surely then there’s no more reason for RHP to ban the word.
Anyhoo. Read the article.
Not for the substance, but for the dire warning the BBC gives us:
“Warning: this report contains strong language.”
Well, with a warning like that, I reckoned trump had went off on a drunken Scot bender of f’s, b’s and c’s...
But no. Just a bit of BS.