15 Jun 05
Originally posted by STANGI thought thats what these past month or so of your constant crapping.. er.. recruiting on here and wherever else you wer was for. but if it didnt even make the back page of any publication i saw in that following WEEK plus... yer gunna need to work reeeeeeeeeeal hard to make front page even...
Not correct. You're forgetting exponential growth.
15 Jun 05
Originally posted by xxxenophobeDo an internet search for "remove bush" with "1 june" and imagine what 34 times as many people can achieve, combined with the lessons learned from the first attempt (e.g. to allow more time and not to do it during university vacations in countires like Canada).
I thought thats what these past month or so of your constant crapping.. er.. recruiting on here and wherever else you wer was for. but if it didnt even make the back page of any publication i saw in that following WEEK plus... yer gunna need to work reeeeeeeeeeal hard to make front page even...
16 Jun 05
Originally posted by STANGAfter that, do an internet search for "remove clinton". Notice that you get tons more results (at least on google).
Do an internet search for "remove bush" with "1 june" and imagine what 34 times as many people can achieve, combined with the lessons learned from the first attempt (e.g. to allow more time and not to do it during university vacations in countires like Canada).
Learn the lesson. Hire an intern to seduce Bush.
16 Jun 05
Originally posted by xxxenophobeWakey wakey !
I thought thats what these past month or so of your constant crapping.. er.. recruiting on here and wherever else you wer was for. but if it didnt even make the back page of any publication i saw in that following WEEK plus... yer gunna need to work reeeeeeeeeeal hard to make front page even...
First, there is a simple, powerful moral case for impeachment. Bush deliberately lied to Congress and to the American people about the justifications for going to war. If you are still in any doubt about this, I suggest that you visit the site http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/lieofthecentury.html .
Second, this is not some fringe issue. Since publication of the Downing Street memo it has obstinately refused to leave the public agenda, contributing to Bush's approval ratings sinking to an all time low. A Yahoo search for "impeach Bush" gives 730,000 results. One of several dedicated sites http://www.impeach-bush-now.org lists some of the diverse people who are backing the campaign. This article recently appeared in the Baltimore Sun : http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/05/06/Bush_lied.html .
If Bush survives, he can thank a bunch of careerist politicians and a partisan national media. But all is not over yet. There are a great many people ready to stand up and be counted and say this stinks, and we're not going to let him get away with this one.
16 Jun 05
1 edit
Originally posted by bolshevikOne of bolshevik's suggested sites for truth will lead you to David Irving. Here's just a short quote of what the House of Commons thought of Mr. Irving's idea of truth:
Wakey wakey !
First, there is a simple, powerful moral case for impeachment. Bush deliberately lied to Congress and to the American people about the justifications for going to war. If you are still in any doubt about this, I suggest t ...[text shortened]... is stinks, and we're not going to let him get away with this one.
"This House, on the occasion of the reunion in London of 1,000 refugees from the Holocaust…is appalled by the allegation by Nazi protagonist and longtime Hitler apologist David Irving that "the infamous gas chambers...did not exist."
House of Commons [Early Day] motion, 20 June 1989