They now want to focus on the sexuality of historical figures rather than what they did in public schools all across the Peoples Republic of California.
So the question begs, If a 14 year old is too young to understand sex when allegedly pursued by Judge Roy Moore why are we teaching them about sexuality?
Originally posted by @whodey https://www.redstate.com/joesquire/2017/11/18/new-california-textbooks-put-focus-people’s-sexuality-instead-ya-know-history/
They now want to focus on the sexuality of historical figures rather than what they did in public schools all across the Peoples Republic of California.
So the question begs, If a 14 year old is too young to understand sex when allegedly pursued by Judge Roy Moore why are we teaching them about sexuality?
Originally posted by @whodey https://www.redstate.com/joesquire/2017/11/18/new-california-textbooks-put-focus-people’s-sexuality-instead-ya-know-history/
They now want to focus on the sexuality of historical figures rather than what they did in public schools all across the Peoples Republic of California.
So the question begs, If a 14 year old is too young to understand sex when allegedly pursued by Judge Roy Moore why are we teaching them about sexuality?
Whodey, you've found a home!
Never have educated voters so uniformly rejected a candidate. But never before have the lesser-educated so uniformly supported a candidate.
California at it again
24 Nov '17 22:331 edit
Back to Top