California at it again

https://www.redstate.com/joesquire/2017/11/18/new-california-textbooks-put-focus-people’s-sexuality-instead-ya-know-history/

They now want to focus on the sexuality of historical figures rather than what they did in public schools all across the Peoples Republic of California.

So the question begs, If a 14 year old is too young to understand sex when allegedly pursued by Judge Roy Moore why are we teaching them about sexuality?

Originally posted by @whodey
https://www.redstate.com/joesquire/2017/11/18/new-california-textbooks-put-focus-people’s-sexuality-instead-ya-know-history/

They now want to focus on the sexuality of historical figures rather than what they did in public schools all across the Peoples Republic of California.

So the question begs, If a 14 year old is too young to understand sex when allegedly pursued by Judge Roy Moore why are we teaching them about sexuality?

If a five year old is too young to be thrown in the ocean, why even are we teaching them to swim??

Originally posted by @whodey
https://www.redstate.com/joesquire/2017/11/18/new-california-textbooks-put-focus-people’s-sexuality-instead-ya-know-history/

They now want to focus on the sexuality of historical figures rather than what they did in public schools all across the Peoples Republic of California.

So the question begs, If a 14 year old is too young to understand sex when allegedly pursued by Judge Roy Moore why are we teaching them about sexuality?

Sounds almost as bad as those Texas textbooks that call slaves “immigrant workers”.