http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5163041/California-braces-high-winds-wildfires-continue.html
Being the climate alarmists that they are, Californians have resigned themselves to continual brush fires till the end of the world.
Er......um.............yea.
I reckon that makes two places where continual fire is considered normal. It must suck having it in both worlds.
Send pitch forks, won't you?
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29598
12 Dec 17
Originally posted by @whodeyFresh out of pitch forks, but will send you some Temazepam.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5163041/California-braces-high-winds-wildfires-continue.html
Being the climate alarmists that they are, Californians have resigned themselves to continual brush fires till the end of the world.
Er......um.............yea.
I reckon that makes two places where continual fire is considered normal. It must suck having it in both worlds.
Send pitch forks, won't you?
13 Dec 17
Originally posted by @whodeyI reckon that makes two places where continual fire is considered normal. It must suck having it in both worlds.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5163041/California-braces-high-winds-wildfires-continue.html
Being the climate alarmists that they are, Californians have resigned themselves to continual brush fires till the end of the world.
Er......um.............yea.
I reckon that makes two places where continual fire is considered normal. It must suck having it in both worlds.
Send pitch forks, won't you?
Whodey, 300+ years ago wildfires, started mostly by lightning burned areas many times larger than these wildfires of today. So, yes, it is normal.
Sometimes trying to politicize nature just doesn't work.