Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. 12 Dec '17 21:09 / 3 edits
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5163041/California-braces-high-winds-wildfires-continue.html

    Being the climate alarmists that they are, Californians have resigned themselves to continual brush fires till the end of the world.



    Er......um.............yea.

    I reckon that makes two places where continual fire is considered normal. It must suck having it in both worlds.

    Send pitch forks, won't you?
  2. Standard member Ghost of a Duke
    Zen Master
    12 Dec '17 21:15
    Originally posted by @whodey
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5163041/California-braces-high-winds-wildfires-continue.html

    Being the climate alarmists that they are, Californians have resigned themselves to continual brush fires till the end of the world.



    Er......um.............yea.

    I reckon that makes two places where continual fire is considered normal. It must suck having it in both worlds.

    Send pitch forks, won't you?
    Fresh out of pitch forks, but will send you some Temazepam.
  3. Subscriber mchill
    Infinitorum
    13 Dec '17 17:37
    Originally posted by @whodey
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5163041/California-braces-high-winds-wildfires-continue.html

    Being the climate alarmists that they are, Californians have resigned themselves to continual brush fires till the end of the world.



    Er......um.............yea.

    I reckon that makes two places where continual fire is considered normal. It must suck having it in both worlds.

    Send pitch forks, won't you?
    I reckon that makes two places where continual fire is considered normal. It must suck having it in both worlds.


    Whodey, 300+ years ago wildfires, started mostly by lightning burned areas many times larger than these wildfires of today. So, yes, it is normal.

    Sometimes trying to politicize nature just doesn't work.