Debates Forum
- Joined
- 02 Jan '06
- Moves
- 12857
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5163041/California-braces-high-winds-wildfires-continue.html
Being the climate alarmists that they are, Californians have resigned themselves to continual brush fires till the end of the world.
Er......um.............yea.
I reckon that makes two places where continual fire is considered normal. It must suck having it in both worlds.
Send pitch forks, won't you?
The Ghost Chamber
- Joined
- 14 Mar '15
- Moves
- 28602
Originally posted by @whodey
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5163041/California-braces-high-winds-wildfires-continue.html
Being the climate alarmists that they are, Californians have resigned themselves to continual brush fires till the end of the world.
Er......um.............yea.
I reckon that makes two places where continual fire is considered normal. It must suck having it in both worlds.
Send pitch forks, won't you?
Fresh out of pitch forks, but will send you some Temazepam.
Behind the scenes
- Joined
- 27 Jun '16
- Moves
- 3077
Originally posted by @whodey
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5163041/California-braces-high-winds-wildfires-continue.html
Being the climate alarmists that they are, Californians have resigned themselves to continual brush fires till the end of the world.
Er......um.............yea.
I reckon that makes two places where continual fire is considered normal. It must suck having it in both worlds.
Send pitch forks, won't you?
I reckon that makes two places where continual fire is considered normal. It must suck having it in both worlds.
Whodey, 300+ years ago wildfires, started mostly by lightning burned areas many times larger than these wildfires of today. So, yes, it is normal.
Sometimes trying to politicize nature just doesn't work.
Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree