Can negative coverage be better than no coverage?

Originally posted by FMF
Are you talking about people dismissing The Blaze out of hand or people dismissing mediamatters out of hand, here?

Im not talking about any amorphous, faceless crowd of ideologues with a tendency to shoot messengers, Im referring specifically to uther's unreasonable dismissive attitude towards an specific article that happened to come from mediamatters, something that is clear to anybody who isn't merely interested in scoring a few points with some lame and utterly frivolous passive-aggressive question- such as this one.

Originally posted by generalissimo
[b]...I avoid mediamatters like the plague.

So there it is, you've dismissed an entire article you had not even glanced at, primarily because of its origin. The ideologue's mindset in a nutshell.[/b]

I said post it.
Im not going to that site and getting a virus.

Originally posted by utherpendragon
I said post it.
Im not going to that site and getting a virus.

I'd be generous if were to call this display of yours "unconvincing".