Go back
Chris Rock on Voting for Obama

Chris Rock on Voting for Obama

Debates

Clock

"If you're voting against Obama because he can't get stuff done it's kind of like saying, "This guy can't cure cancer. I'm gonna vote for the cancer."

-Chris Rock

Clock

Originally posted by Kunsoo
"If you're voting against Obama because he can't get stuff done it's kind of like saying, "This guy can't cure cancer. I'm gonna vote for the cancer."

-Chris Rock
So he would not vote for a cancer but will vote for Obama? Isn't that contradictory?

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
So he would not vote for a cancer but will vote for Obama? Isn't that contradictory?
Heh, well after "Obama is a socialist" and "Obama is Hitler", I guess "Obama is cancer" is the next logical step.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Kunsoo
"If you're voting against Obama because he can't get stuff done it's kind of like saying, "This guy can't cure cancer. I'm gonna vote for the cancer."

-Chris Rock
No, it's like saying "I'm going to vote to give someone else a chance to cure cancer."

Rock's quote makes no sense at all in any context.

Clock
1 edit

Originally posted by sh76
No, it's like saying "I'm going to vote to give someone else a chance to cure cancer."

Rock's quote makes no sense at all in any context.
Exactly. If the guy's job is to cure cancer, and he can't do the job ... you gotta let him go. 🙂

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sleepyguy
Exactly. If the guy's job is to cure cancer, and he can't do the job ... you gotta let him go. 🙂
Er....um....there is no cure for cancer. It's like asking how to cure death.

So it all boils down to how we want to die. Do we want to all go out flat broke or a little bit of change in our pockets? 😛

Of course, both parties claim to have the cure, don't they?

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
No, it's like saying "I'm going to vote to give someone else a chance to cure cancer."

Rock's quote makes no sense at all in any context.
But you of course miss Rock's point, which is that the Republicans themselves ARE the problem. To the degree that he's failed, it was in his inability to overcome the historical record on filibusters, a party which made an insane pledge to never raise any taxes under any circumstances, to obsess over the debt when the primary issue should have been economic development, and which was hellbent on bringing Obama down from the first moment of his Presidency. You failed to get the context, because you refuse to see it.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sleepyguy
Exactly. If the guy's job is to cure cancer, and he can't do the job ... you gotta let him go. 🙂
His job was to reverse the Republican course - which was the cancer. He wasn't entirely successful, but he did finally bring the country to the 21st century with regard to health care.

Rock's point, which was elaborated on by Jon Stewart last week, is that the Republicans had it in for his presidency from the get-go. Romney said in his speech that he supported the President in the beginning, but Stewart brought out some interviews of the time which show it was clearly not the case.

Unfortunately the Republicans have been taken over by nihilists, some of whom are willing to bring the economy down just to keep Obama to one term.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
Rock's quote makes no sense at all in any context.
The ex-parrot was not pining for the fjords.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Kunsoo
But you of course miss Rock's point, which is that the Republicans themselves ARE the problem. To the degree that he's failed, it was in his inability to overcome the historical record on filibusters, a party which made an insane pledge to never raise any taxes under any circumstances, to obsess over the debt when the primary issue should have been economic ...[text shortened]... first moment of his Presidency. You failed to get the context, because you refuse to see it.
But people aren't going to vote for him or not because he did or did not stop the Republicans. They're going to vote for him based on whether they like his policies and his own economic record.

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
But people aren't going to vote for him or not because he did or did not stop the Republicans. They're going to vote for him based on whether they like his policies and his own economic record.
Of if he is Samual Jackson because he looks likes him. (cough, chris rock)

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

http://godfatherpolitics.com/6868/the-story-that-could-win-mitt-romney-the-presidency/

and now I'm off for an elk trip,, things will be the same when I get back :-)

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Hugh Glass
[b
and now I'm off for an elk trip,, :-)[/b]
Wut?

Clock
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
But people aren't going to vote for him or not because he did or did not stop the Republicans. They're going to vote for him based on whether they like his policies and his own economic record.
Exactly. And that's what Rock is commenting on. The Republicans stonewalled everything Obama tried to do, so it's their economic record in reality. But many voters don't dig that deep. That's the point of the comment.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Kunsoo
Exactly. And that's what Rock is commenting on. The Republicans stonewalled everything Obama tried to do, so it's their economic record in reality. But many voters don't dig that deep. That's the point of the comment.
I just loved how they stonewalled Obamacare.

Classic.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.