12 Feb 13
1 edit
http://www.redstate.com/2013/02/09/fbi-matthew-aaron-llaneza-san-francisco/
A man by the name of Matthew Llaneza apparently wanted to blow up a bank in San Francisco. To do so, he met with a man whom he thought was part of the Taliban but who was really an FBI agent. The reason? He wanted to try and frame right winged militias as the culprits, thus ushering in a civil war of sorts between gun owning right winged militias and the government.
Has anyone seen this in the press? Strange, I have not. 😲
- Joined
- 29 Dec 08
- Moves
- 6788
12 Feb 13
Originally posted by whodeyI heard it on my local news here in N. California.
http://www.redstate.com/2013/02/09/fbi-matthew-aaron-llaneza-san-francisco/
A man by the name of Matthew Llaneza apparently wanted to blow up a bank in San Francisco. To do so, he met with a man whom he thought was part of the Taliban but who was really an FBI agent. The reason? He wanted to try and frame right winged militias as the culprits, thus ushe ...[text shortened]... ged militias and the government.
Has anyone seen this in the press? Strange, I have not. 😲
Also:
"According to the affidavit filed in support of the criminal complaint, on November 30, 2012, Llaneza met with a man who led him to believe he was connected with the Taliban and the mujahidin in Afghanistan. In reality, this man was an undercover FBI agent. At this initial meeting, Llaneza proposed conducting a car-bomb attack against a bank in the San Francisco Bay Area. He proposed structuring the attack to make it appear that the responsible party was an umbrella organization for a loose collection of anti-government militias and their sympathizers. Llaneza’s stated goal was to trigger a governmental crackdown, which he expected would trigger a right-wing counter-response against the government followed by, he hoped, civil war.
The complaint further alleges that Llaneza subsequently selected the Bank of America branch at 303 Hegenberger Road in Oakland as the target for the attack. Llaneza ultimately specified a spot next to a support column of the bank building as a good location for the bomb, expressed a desire for the bomb to bring down the entire bank building, and offered to drive the car bomb to the bank at the time of the attack.
Read more: http://nation.foxnews.com/terrorism/2013/02/12/[WORD TOO LONG]
"
13 Feb 13
Originally posted by whodeyI guess that puts to rest all the talk about false flag events? 😀
http://www.redstate.com/2013/02/09/fbi-matthew-aaron-llaneza-san-francisco/
A man by the name of Matthew Llaneza apparently wanted to blow up a bank in San Francisco. To do so, he met with a man whom he thought was part of the Taliban but who was really an FBI agent. The reason? He wanted to try and frame right winged militias as the culprits, thus ushe ...[text shortened]... ged militias and the government.
Has anyone seen this in the press? Strange, I have not. 😲
13 Feb 13
Originally posted by JS357In the annals of idiot criminals, this guy has to be close to the top. Stories like this make me happy. He'll really like federal prison.
I heard it on my local news here in N. California.
Also:
"According to the affidavit filed in support of the criminal complaint, on November 30, 2012, Llaneza met with a man who led him to believe he was connected with the Taliban and the mujahidin in Afghanistan. In reality, this man was an undercover FBI agent. At this initial meeting, Llaneza proposed ...[text shortened]... source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FoxNation+(Fox+Nation)#ixzz2KjNtxeMa
"
13 Feb 13
Originally posted by menace71I don't think it will be that big of a deal. Out of all the people in this country who own guns, I'll bet less than 1% of them would even think about fighting law enforcement to keep them. The militias might fight, but ordinary gun owners would most likely hand them over meekly and go about their daily lives. There would be grumbling, but a mass revolt seems unlikely to me.
I think when the $%#* will hit the fan is when Cops/DHS and whoever actually start to try and take guns away from people
Manny
13 Feb 13
Originally posted by whodeyHow would such an act have ushered in a "civil war" between "militias" (who?) and the government?
http://www.redstate.com/2013/02/09/fbi-matthew-aaron-llaneza-san-francisco/
A man by the name of Matthew Llaneza apparently wanted to blow up a bank in San Francisco. To do so, he met with a man whom he thought was part of the Taliban but who was really an FBI agent. The reason? He wanted to try and frame right winged militias as the culprits, thus ushe ...[text shortened]... ged militias and the government.
Has anyone seen this in the press? Strange, I have not. 😲
17 Feb 13
Originally posted by whodeyNut cases always want to do stupid things. Let's focus on something important
http://www.redstate.com/2013/02/09/fbi-matthew-aaron-llaneza-san-francisco/
A man by the name of Matthew Llaneza apparently wanted to blow up a bank in San Francisco. To do so, he met with a man whom he thought was part of the Taliban but who was really an FBI agent. The reason? He wanted to try and frame right winged militias as the culprits, thus ushe ...[text shortened]... ged militias and the government.
Has anyone seen this in the press? Strange, I have not. 😲
20 Feb 13
Originally posted by whodeyBe on the lookout for right-wing militia nuts and christian fundamentalist terrorists. Report anything suspicious.
http://www.redstate.com/2013/02/09/fbi-matthew-aaron-llaneza-san-francisco/
A man by the name of Matthew Llaneza apparently wanted to blow up a bank in San Francisco. To do so, he met with a man whom he thought was part of the Taliban but who was really an FBI agent. The reason? He wanted to try and frame right winged militias as the culprits, thus ushe ...[text shortened]... ged militias and the government.
Has anyone seen this in the press? Strange, I have not. 😲