Originally posted by whodey
A man by the name of Matthew Llaneza apparently wanted to blow up a bank in San Francisco. To do so, he met with a man whom he thought was part of the Taliban but who was really an FBI agent. The reason? He wanted to try and frame right winged militias as the culprits, thus ushe ...[text shortened]... ged militias and the government.
Has anyone seen this in the press? Strange, I have not.
I heard it on my local news here in N. California.
"According to the affidavit filed in support of the criminal complaint, on November 30, 2012, Llaneza met with a man who led him to believe he was connected with the Taliban and the mujahidin in Afghanistan. In reality, this man was an undercover FBI agent. At this initial meeting, Llaneza proposed conducting a car-bomb attack against a bank in the San Francisco Bay Area. He proposed structuring the attack to make it appear that the responsible party was an umbrella organization for a loose collection of anti-government militias and their sympathizers. Llaneza’s stated goal was to trigger a governmental crackdown, which he expected would trigger a right-wing counter-response against the government followed by, he hoped, civil war.
The complaint further alleges that Llaneza subsequently selected the Bank of America branch at 303 Hegenberger Road in Oakland as the target for the attack. Llaneza ultimately specified a spot next to a support column of the bank building as a good location for the bomb, expressed a desire for the bomb to bring down the entire bank building, and offered to drive the car bomb to the bank at the time of the attack.
Read more: http://nation.foxnews.com/terrorism/2013/02/12/false-flag-conservatives-framed-terror-attack?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FoxNation+(Fox+Nation)#ixzz2KjNtxeMa