@Cliff-Mashburn saidThe guy doesn't know what he is talking about. The Anti-Commandeering doctrine has been established by the SCOTUS since 1793:
They don't know how to handle it, cut to commercial hahahahaha.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJKlZ3BHiv4
"The Supreme Court has long held that states do not have to actively participate in the enforcement or effectuation of federal acts or regulatory programs."
"Printz v. United States (1997) is generally cited as the lynchpin for the anti-commandeering doctrine. At issue was a provision in the Brady Gun Bill that required county law enforcement officers to administer part of the background check program. Sheriffs Jay Printz and Richard Mack sued, arguing these provisions unconstitutionally forced them to administer a federal program. Justice Antonin Scalia agreed, writing in the majority opinion “it is apparent that the Brady Act purports to direct state law enforcement officers to participate, albeit only temporarily, in the administration of a federally enacted regulatory scheme.”
Citing the New York case, the court majority declared this provision of the Brady Gun Bill unconstitutional, expanding the reach of the anti-commandeering doctrine.
We held in New York that Congress cannot compel the States to enact or enforce a federal regulatory program.
Today we hold that Congress cannot circumvent that prohibition by conscripting the States’ officers directly. The Federal Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States’ officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. It matters not whether policymaking is involved, and no case-by-case weighing of the burdens or benefits is necessary; such commands are fundamentally incompatible with our constitutional system of dual sovereignty."
https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2018/05/23/anti-commandeering-an-overview-of-five-major-supreme-court-cases/
Sanctuary policies, protected by the Constitution, did not cause this situation; excessive militarization of ICE, including waving automatic rifles in stores in densely populated areas, to arrest workers did.
