When people of different ethno-socio, and religious backgrounds are lumped together to form a nation for material and economic gain of the colonial masters, there is bound to be friction and mistrust amongst the people of the nation even after the departure of the perpetrators.
😳:'(
Originally posted by BluevenusYou've been reading Franz Fanon!
When people of different ethno-socio, and religious backgrounds are lumped together to form a nation for material and economic gain of the colonial masters, there is bound to be friction and mistrust amongst the people of the nation even after the departure of the perpetrators.
😳:'(
Originally posted by BluevenusAGREED...BUT ARE YOU AN ETHNIC MINORITY IN BLIGHTY?
When people of different ethno-socio, and religious backgrounds are lumped together to form a nation for material and economic gain of the colonial masters, there is bound to be friction and mistrust amongst the people of the nation even after the departure of the perpetrators.
😳:'(
Originally posted by zeeblebotThe distrust and near revolutionary state that exists in several former Soviet republics offers a clear example of mistrust and hostility stimulated by colonization that manifests itself with particular vengeance after the colonizing power has departed.
really? ... look at the previous century .... how does your statement apply to the European war in WWII ... was Russia a victim of colonization? ... how about France? ...
Originally posted by Wulebgrhis/her headline says colonialism is the "root" of world instability, not just an example ...
The distrust and near revolutionary state that exists in several former Soviet republics offers a clear example of mistrust and hostility stimulated by colonization that manifests itself with particular vengeance after the colonizing power has departed.
i suppose you could say the world would be very stable if the colonies had not come back and rescued the old countries from each other ... but who would want to live there ... one quarter of the world under germany and one half under japan ...
so where are the colonialists of the 21st century?
Originally posted by BluevenusYou mean colonisation by the European powers in the past centuries or do you also include the colonisation by the Romans, the Arabs, the Mongols, the Chinese, etc.
When people of different ethno-socio, and religious backgrounds are lumped together to form a nation for material and economic gain of the colonial masters, there is bound to be friction and mistrust amongst the people of the nation even after the departure of the perpetrators.
😳:'(
The latest I heard is that some extremist Islamist groups want Andalucia in Spain "back" because it was once a part of the Arab (Islam?) empire ...... NUTS.
Originally posted by zeeblebot
his/her headline says colonialism is the "root" of world instability, not just an example ...
I would agree that it is a root, and with racism, classism, and religious imperialism, economic and political colonization takes its place among the main roots of instability. All the other roots are relatively insignificant.
i suppose you could say the world would be very stable if the colonies had not come back and rescued the old countries from each other ... but who would want to live there ... one quarter of the world under germany and one half under japan ...
Those performing the rescue you reference here were the descendants of colonists, not the peoples colonized. Do not mistake the dominant population of the United States and Canada for colonized peoples. They are colonists who remained, and drove those they colonized into submission. The end of colonization in North America means returning the lands to the Indians.
so where are the colonialists of the 21st century?
NASA, several missionary organizations, international business specialists woking for NIKE, ...
Do you begin to understand?
Originally posted by Wulebgr
Originally posted by zeeblebot
[b]his/her headline says colonialism is the "root" of world instability, not just an example ...
I would agree that it is a root, and with racism, classism, and religious imperialism, economic and political colonization takes its place among the main roots of instability. All the other roots are relatively insignificant.
colonialism is immigration without quotas or inspection procedures ...
[b]i suppose you could say the world would be very stable if the colonies had not come back and rescued the old countries from each other ... but who would want to live there ... one quarter of the world under germany and one half under japan ...
Those performing the rescue you reference here were the descendants of colonists, not the peoples colonized. Do not mistake the dominant population of the United States and Canada for colonized peoples. They are colonists who remained, and drove those they colonized into submission. The end of colonization in North America means returning the lands to the Indians.
[/b] to what purpose? so they can give it back in turn to the Anasazi or pre-Anasazi? what about all the half/quarter/octo breeds?
so where are the colonialists of the 21st century?
NASA, several missionary organizations, international business specialists woking for NIKE, ...
Do you begin to understand?
("begin to understand?" .... what is this "little grasshopper" crap?)
none of these are colonists ... NASA's the closest, and they're not even close ... why not include McDonald's? ...