1. SubscriberWajoma
    Die Cheeseburger
    Provocation
    Joined
    01 Sep '04
    Moves
    77393
    21 May '11 10:47
    Originally posted by FMF
    As I said, we disagree over the issue of constructive dismissal. As far as I am concerned, a constructive dismissal case that has any chance of getting through the courts would be one that involves 'force' and 'fraud', albeit perhaps not according to your definitions of 'force' and 'fraud'. "Saying mean things" and "ridiculous hint, hint processes" sound like fr ...[text shortened]... ut I do understand why you want to trivialize the concept of constructive dismissal.
    And why is that?
  2. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    21 May '11 10:59
    Originally posted by Wajoma
    And why is that?
    Why is what? Why do I think you want to trivialize the concept of constructive dismissal?

    Because I think you only want to endorse proscriptions [that do not conform purely to the force/fraud thing] that you choose to endorse; not proscriptions that others endorse that also deviate from a pure take on the force/fraud thing. That's why it comes down to definitions.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree