16d
I'm probably not the first to observe this, but since Trump has dumped DEI into the dustbin of history, isn't it ironic that many if not most of his appointments are not the most meritorious of the candidates that could be called on, so in typical Trump fashion he's doing two things at once embracing and junking at the same time, because surely most of his proposed candidates constitute DEI hires.
16d
@kmax87 said😂 the problem democrats have with Trumps nominations are they are very qualified, none will play the DC game.
I'm probably not the first to observe this, but since Trump has dumped DEI into the dustbin of history, isn't it ironic that many if not most of his appointments are not the most meritorious of the candidates that could be called on, so in typical Trump fashion he's doing two things at once embracing and junking at the same time, because surely most of his proposed candidates constitute DEI hires.
That the reason they wont let them answer questions at the hearings…
Sanders got exposed by allowing a slip up.
16d
@kmax87 saiduh, there's a difference between hiring someone to fill a DEI quota vs hiring somoene because they won't say no to you...the problem is neither one of those reasons should be why you hire someone.
I'm probably not the first to observe this, but since Trump has dumped DEI into the dustbin of history, isn't it ironic that many if not most of his appointments are not the most meritorious of the candidates that could be called on, so in typical Trump fashion he's doing two things at once embracing and junking at the same time, because surely most of his proposed candidates constitute DEI hires.