By paying people to have racist rallies?
The SCPL, (Southern Poverty Law Center)
Was taking in millions of dollars in donations to "fight racism" but they were paying people to have racist rallies.
How convenient, you need donations to keep the organization alive so why not pay people to have racist rallies so you can claim that racism is rampant and you need donations to fight the racism....
...which they created! Lmao
They are trying to say they were paying informants but the informants that got paid a lot of money had to set up and run racist rallies as part of the deal.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyrkd022ejo
@Typical-Dims saidSeems bad, sure. But isn't it also bad that the government is targeting the method and intent in which a non-profit uses its money?
By paying people to have racist rallies?
The SCPL, (Southern Poverty Law Center)
Was taking in millions of dollars in donations to "fight racism" but they were paying people to have racist rallies.
How convenient, you need donations to keep the organization alive so why not pay people to have racist rallies so you can claim that racism is rampant and you need do ...[text shortened]... set up and run racist rallies as part of the deal.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyrkd022ejo
I think the government is going to lose this case. It doesn't appear to be fraud.
5 edits
@Typical-Dims saidYour link makes you pay to read it, so here's a free one from the Guardian:
Was taking in millions of dollars in donations to "fight racism" but they were paying people to have racist rallies.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/apr/21/splc-fraud-charges-explained
There's no "paying racist rallies". They paid informants to rat out racist organizations like the Klan and have done so for years:
The center previously used paid informants to infiltrate extremist groups and gather information on their activities, often sharing it with local and federal law enforcement
I'm 100% sure you didn't read your link since it requires payment. You probably just saw a synopsis from whatever right-wing Facebook group you're on.
1 edit
@Typical-Dims saidBack again already?
By paying people to have racist rallies?
The SCPL, (Southern Poverty Law Center)
Was taking in millions of dollars in donations to "fight racism" but they were paying people to have racist rallies.
How convenient, you need donations to keep the organization alive so why not pay people to have racist rallies so you can claim that racism is rampant and you need do ...[text shortened]... set up and run racist rallies as part of the deal.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyrkd022ejo
How can we keep these serially banned people from coming back?
1 edit
@Typical-Dims saidThis from a philosophy that considers attacks against racist white people as racism.
By paying people to have racist rallies?
The SCPL, (Southern Poverty Law Center)
Was taking in millions of dollars in donations to "fight racism" but they were paying people to have racist rallies.
How convenient, you need donations to keep the organization alive so why not pay people to have racist rallies so you can claim that racism is rampant and you need do ...[text shortened]... set up and run racist rallies as part of the deal.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyrkd022ejo
There is absolutely zero correct about this post.
SPLC has long been a thorn in your racist sides since they first came about.
I'm getting pretty tired of the right lying about the left.
But the Republicans have long, long blamed the left for what the right considers their birthright. They would bring back slavery if they could. Since they can't, they are satisfied with economically keeping blacks down.
And then they blame the left for the very thing they are guilty of. This 'down is up and up is down' rhetoric started with Reagan.
@wildgrass saidThe fraud is the right claiming this is happening.
Seems bad, sure. But isn't it also bad that the government is targeting the method and intent in which a non-profit uses its money?
I think the government is going to lose this case. It doesn't appear to be fraud.
@boonon saidIs that what your chosen propaganda outlets are telling you?
Exactly. Your kind of rhetoric proves your violent tendencies. You are disgusting. Attempts to K&LL Obama , and Biden = zero. Which I personally find positive. You find the 3 failed attempts by your violent group think leftists O.K ?????
https://www.politico.com/story/2011/11/man-charged-with-attempted-assassination-of-obama-068622
@boonon saidThis is about as dumb as it sounds.
Exactly. Your kind of rhetoric proves your violent tendencies. You are disgusting. Attempts to K&LL Obama , and Biden = zero. Which I personally find positive. You find the 3 failed attempts by your violent group think leftists O.K ?????
@AThousandYoung saidmaybe there were "0" attempts on Obama and Biden because their secret service was competent and caught them early. Also they weren't narcissist douchebags to throw tantrums they aren't getting their royal ballrooms
Is that what your chosen propaganda outlets are telling you?
https://www.politico.com/story/2011/11/man-charged-with-attempted-assassination-of-obama-068622