Dems vow to stop Trump enforcement of Trumps immigration policies.
What in the…..
U mean….can we at least , #1, establish what the law is. And the #2, agree to abide by and enforce the law? The law?
Come to think of it, I have never seen any of the liberal posters here. Use the word illegal immigrant or illegal anything. I find that very curious.
@AverageJoe1 saidWell, considering I oppose borders, how curious is it that I don’t call people illegal?
Dems vow to stop Trump enforcement of Trumps immigration policies.
What in the…..
U mean….can we at least , #1, establish what the law is. And the #2, agree to abide by and enforce the law? The law?
Come to think of it, I have never seen any of the liberal posters here. Use the word illegal immigrant or illegal anything. I find that very curious.
As for following the law… look at your own party. Fvcking hypocrite.
@AverageJoe1 saidTrump tried to subverting the law by executive orders which violated statutory language regarding immigration in his first term and the courts slapped him down as I already showed you. If he tries to do the same thing, he should get the same results. I gave you the links on this page: https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/trump-to-open-internment-camps.201092/page-10
Dems vow to stop Trump enforcement of Trumps immigration policies.
What in the…..
U mean….can we at least , #1, establish what the law is. And the #2, agree to abide by and enforce the law? The law?
Come to think of it, I have never seen any of the liberal posters here. Use the word illegal immigrant or illegal anything. I find that very curious.
The case was East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald Trump
@shavixmir saidPut Shav in your journals as opposing any borders. This of course means that his neighbors who sacrifice goats in their yards, and who will kill a daughter who looks gazing-ly at a boy, are welcome in his yard. HE is a hypocrite, or a liar, whic I guess is the same thing.
Well, considering I oppose borders, how curious is it that I don’t call people illegal?
As for following the law… look at your own party. Fvcking hypocrite.
(Shav, you are easily defeated on the Forum)
Shav is now going to tell us where repubs don’t follow the law. If he takes a stab at it, have some whataboutisms ready, like opening a regulated border with the stroke of a pen. Or this one, Dems give finger to us who do not want law broken when counting ballots. Hilarious. Losers all, which Shav finds coooommmfffort with.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pennsylvania-democrats-openly-admit-counting-illegal-ballots-mccormick-casey-race
If you don’t bother with opening the link, ( which I myself seldom do), the law is clear, unsigned ballots must be discarded.. Shav, that means not counted.
Uhhhh, Shav, the counters told us that they care not what the law says. They are going to count them. Please stay on this issue, and do not do a marauder Dodge like he does above,
A truly classic Dodge marauder. You immediately try to make the issue about Trump having done something. The issue is about Democrats who are saying that they are going to stop Trump. You really need to catch up. I don’t want you to start sounding like Sunhouse.
@AverageJoe1 saidYour lack of reality is astounding.
Put Shav in your journals as opposing any borders. This of course means that his neighbors who sacrifice goats in their yards, and who will kill a daughter who looks gazing-ly at a boy, are welcome in his yard. HE is a hypocrite, or a liar, whic I guess is the same thing.
(Shav, you are easily defeated on the Forum)
Shav is now going to tell us where repubs don ...[text shortened]... xnews.com/politics/pennsylvania-democrats-openly-admit-counting-illegal-ballots-mccormick-casey-race
As is your pathetic framing.
@divegeester
If that was the only issue we have at fault with Trump there would BE no problem.
The PROBLEM is not just his views on the border but his ABSOLUTE zeal to control all branches of government and I don't think you understand just what it means to that end for Trump to put in total Trump loyalists as for instance, AG.
Matt Gaetz as AG is clearly one of the worse picks POSSIBLE for that job since it WOULD mean Trump trump controls DOJ through the fealty of Gaetz.
Do you think I am full of shyyte over that matter?
Does the name Putin come to mind here? Trumps best friend and mentor?
@sonhouse saidI DO think you are really off the wall in saying Gaetz is feal-tized to Trump, as if someone else in his party would be different?
@divegeester
If that was the only issue we have at fault with Trump there would BE no problem.
The PROBLEM is not just his views on the border but his ABSOLUTE zeal to control all branches of government and I don't think you understand just what it means to that end for Trump to put in total Trump loyalists as for instance, AG.
Matt Gaetz as AG is clearly one of the worse ...[text shortened]... of shyyte over that matter?
Does the name Putin come to mind here? Trumps best friend and mentor?
And if you can name one person, like maybe AOC, that you think would have no fealty, do you think it realistic that he or some other president-elect would appoint that person?
Sonhouse? Are you with me here on this issue? Can you go into adult-mode for once and debate?
PLEASE don’t say unsubstantiated phrases like ‘Trump’s Best Friend Putin’, they just totally sink your posts. Such comments mean nothing to students of this game. Please.