Dems vow to stop Trump enforcement of Trumps immigration policies.
What in the…..
U mean….can we at least , #1, establish what the law is. And the #2, agree to abide by and enforce the law? The law?
Come to think of it, I have never seen any of the liberal posters here. Use the word illegal immigrant or illegal anything. I find that very curious.
@AverageJoe1 saidWell, considering I oppose borders, how curious is it that I don’t call people illegal?
Dems vow to stop Trump enforcement of Trumps immigration policies.
What in the…..
U mean….can we at least , #1, establish what the law is. And the #2, agree to abide by and enforce the law? The law?
Come to think of it, I have never seen any of the liberal posters here. Use the word illegal immigrant or illegal anything. I find that very curious.
As for following the law… look at your own party. Fvcking hypocrite.
@AverageJoe1 saidHere in the UK “illegal” has been replaced with “irregular” immigration by our newly appointed bunch of socialist miscreant goverment lunatics.
I have never seen any of the liberal posters here. Use the word illegal immigrant or illegal anything. I find that very curious.
Meanwhile freedom of speech is being eroded as thousands and thousands of people are being investigated for “non-crime related hate speech”, whatever that is as it isn’t defined in law or elsewhere. A journalist has been visited by police for something she said on X a year ago and a 9 year old boy is now being investigated for using the word “retard”. I kid you not.
The Reverend Starmer made a Prime Minister’s TV broadcast a couple of days ago to announce that a people smuggler from Holland I think it was, has been apprehended. It beggars belief, there are thousands of these people smugglers and he has to come onto the TV to announce he’s got one. Wow. Well done Starmer, we all feel safe now.
Meanwhile over 30,000 irregular (sic) immigrants have crossed the channel under his tenure as PM (that’s 5 months) all claiming asylum and refugee status… fleeing from the horrors of war-torn France who the UK is paying hundreds of millions to stop it happening.
Hotels all over the country are being seconded to house them, weddings and other events being cancelled and there was uproar in Manchester last week when at a residents meeting it was announced that not only are the new “irregular” migrants being put up in a hotel near a school, but in addition to tax payer funded accommodation, food and pocket cash, they are also going to get free private healthcare.
Overall it’s costing the UK tax payer £8,000,000 a day … every day! And it’s getting worse by the day.
Honestly if it wasn’t actually happening I wouldn’t believe it.
@divegeester saidLuckily Brexit sorted Johnny Foreigner out, and the Brits have complete control over their borders again.
Here in the UK “illegal” has been replaced with “irregular” immigration by our newly appointed bunch of socialist miscreant goverment lunatics.
Meanwhile freedom of speech is being eroded as thousands and thousands of people are being investigated for “non-crime related hate speech”, whatever that is as it isn’t defined in law or elsewhere. A journalist has been visit ...[text shortened]... d it’s getting worse by the day.
Honestly if it wasn’t actually happening I wouldn’t believe it.
@shavixmir saidThere no point having freedom from the EU if the government doesn’t exercise it.
Luckily Brexit sorted Johnny Foreigner out, and the Brits have complete control over their borders again.
@divegeester saidNow that's a good one! 😆
“non-crime related hate speech”,
How is that different from "free speech which someone doesn't like"?
@AverageJoe1 saidTrump tried to subverting the law by executive orders which violated statutory language regarding immigration in his first term and the courts slapped him down as I already showed you. If he tries to do the same thing, he should get the same results. I gave you the links on this page: https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/trump-to-open-internment-camps.201092/page-10
Dems vow to stop Trump enforcement of Trumps immigration policies.
What in the…..
U mean….can we at least , #1, establish what the law is. And the #2, agree to abide by and enforce the law? The law?
Come to think of it, I have never seen any of the liberal posters here. Use the word illegal immigrant or illegal anything. I find that very curious.
The case was East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald Trump
@divegeester saidWe reject about 80% of our asylum seekers. You? 😀
Here in the UK “illegal” has been replaced with “irregular” immigration by our newly appointed bunch of socialist miscreant goverment lunatics.
Meanwhile freedom of speech is being eroded as thousands and thousands of people are being investigated for “non-crime related hate speech”, whatever that is as it isn’t defined in law or elsewhere. A journalist has been visit ...[text shortened]... d it’s getting worse by the day.
Honestly if it wasn’t actually happening I wouldn’t believe it.
https://fox5sandiego.com/news/border-report/80-of-asylum-seekers-rejected-dhs-official-says/
@spruce112358 saidEssentially that’s what it is.
Now that's a good one! 😆
How is that different from "free speech which someone doesn't like"?
It’s getting really bonkers over here recently.
@shavixmir saidPut Shav in your journals as opposing any borders. This of course means that his neighbors who sacrifice goats in their yards, and who will kill a daughter who looks gazing-ly at a boy, are welcome in his yard. HE is a hypocrite, or a liar, whic I guess is the same thing.
Well, considering I oppose borders, how curious is it that I don’t call people illegal?
As for following the law… look at your own party. Fvcking hypocrite.
(Shav, you are easily defeated on the Forum)
Shav is now going to tell us where repubs don’t follow the law. If he takes a stab at it, have some whataboutisms ready, like opening a regulated border with the stroke of a pen. Or this one, Dems give finger to us who do not want law broken when counting ballots. Hilarious. Losers all, which Shav finds coooommmfffort with.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pennsylvania-democrats-openly-admit-counting-illegal-ballots-mccormick-casey-race
If you don’t bother with opening the link, ( which I myself seldom do), the law is clear, unsigned ballots must be discarded.. Shav, that means not counted.
Uhhhh, Shav, the counters told us that they care not what the law says. They are going to count them. Please stay on this issue, and do not do a marauder Dodge like he does above,
A truly classic Dodge marauder. You immediately try to make the issue about Trump having done something. The issue is about Democrats who are saying that they are going to stop Trump. You really need to catch up. I don’t want you to start sounding like Sunhouse.
@AverageJoe1 saidYour lack of reality is astounding.
Put Shav in your journals as opposing any borders. This of course means that his neighbors who sacrifice goats in their yards, and who will kill a daughter who looks gazing-ly at a boy, are welcome in his yard. HE is a hypocrite, or a liar, whic I guess is the same thing.
(Shav, you are easily defeated on the Forum)
Shav is now going to tell us where repubs don ...[text shortened]... xnews.com/politics/pennsylvania-democrats-openly-admit-counting-illegal-ballots-mccormick-casey-race
As is your pathetic framing.
@divegeester
If that was the only issue we have at fault with Trump there would BE no problem.
The PROBLEM is not just his views on the border but his ABSOLUTE zeal to control all branches of government and I don't think you understand just what it means to that end for Trump to put in total Trump loyalists as for instance, AG.
Matt Gaetz as AG is clearly one of the worse picks POSSIBLE for that job since it WOULD mean Trump trump controls DOJ through the fealty of Gaetz.
Do you think I am full of shyyte over that matter?
Does the name Putin come to mind here? Trumps best friend and mentor?
@sonhouse saidI DO think you are really off the wall in saying Gaetz is feal-tized to Trump, as if someone else in his party would be different?
@divegeester
If that was the only issue we have at fault with Trump there would BE no problem.
The PROBLEM is not just his views on the border but his ABSOLUTE zeal to control all branches of government and I don't think you understand just what it means to that end for Trump to put in total Trump loyalists as for instance, AG.
Matt Gaetz as AG is clearly one of the worse ...[text shortened]... of shyyte over that matter?
Does the name Putin come to mind here? Trumps best friend and mentor?
And if you can name one person, like maybe AOC, that you think would have no fealty, do you think it realistic that he or some other president-elect would appoint that person?
Sonhouse? Are you with me here on this issue? Can you go into adult-mode for once and debate?
PLEASE don’t say unsubstantiated phrases like ‘Trump’s Best Friend Putin’, they just totally sink your posts. Such comments mean nothing to students of this game. Please.