Go back
Destroy all e-readers

Destroy all e-readers

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Actually electronic text is far less censored than the printed word.

Vote Up
Vote Down

So who exactly sanitizes, edits, and authorizes publications on the Internet?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Apple?

http://xahlee.org/comp/Apple_iPad_censorship.html

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
E-readers are indicative of a society that is fundamentally flawed, but not for the reasons you put forward.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Puleeze. The book and printed page was the e-reader of the past. Your notion is that any media can be controlled and turned into government propaganda, and that is true. It isn't the media's fault.

The fact is that in the year I've owned a Kindle, my reading has increased probably five fold due to the convenience, low cost, and availability of books often not stocked at book stores, or found in local libraries. Before the Kindle, my laptop was a way of getting material, without dedicating a new bookcase every year to storing books I might never read again.

Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

OH NO FARENHEIT 451 IS HERE

Don't forget the book has these secret societies of literate people hiding in the woods tho.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
I am imagining. Now what?


Originally posted by AThousandYoung
OH NO FARENHEIT 451 IS HERE

Don't forget the book has these secret societies of literate people hiding in the woods tho.
At what temperature does a Kindle burn?

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
We don't need to imagine. The Dark Ages were dark because reading was suppressed. Books, starting with translation of the Bible into living languages by reformers began to enlighten people. Many languages in Europe were not written languages.

I can see reasonable guards against government controls of the press, libraries, and publications. All the more reason to keep government out of controls on the internet, despite the cries of folks determined to stop pornography or unpopular ideas.

As already stated, I love my Kindle. In the last ten months I've been able to read stuff I'd have had to make extraordinary efforts to get, and most of them were nearly free. I only wish more older books were available in this format. Bruce Catton's A Stillness at Appomattox was great and so much easier to handle than the hard cover copy of the same author's The Coming Fury.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Spot on!! It's only a matter of time.

It reminds me of them tinkering with movies. For example, Blazzing Saddles I think was targeted as not being politically correct enough because they used the "N" word. Of course, the ironic part of it all was that the entire movie was a spoof on the stupidity of racism.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by normbenign
The Dark Ages were dark because reading was suppressed.
So why does the advent of a new age where reading is even less suppressed than before, apparently cause you to have the opposite reaction? Until the advent of the internet, communication and access to information was highly suppressed (not deliberately but largely due to cost and lack of technology.)
The internet has transformed the world so substantially, that one could justifiably call the period prior to the internet 'the dark ages'.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down