Originally posted by @kazetnagorraThe government should be less of a market participant and then it could avoid the conflict of interest of regulating itself. If it did not try to continually expand, perhaps it could do some functions well instead of trying to do too many poorly.
In what way, specifically? How does shrinking the apparatus of the government to combat corruption, for example, help it combat corruption within its ranks?
Originally posted by @wolfe63Not disagreeing... pork barreling is a huge problem that leads directly to government expansion.
We could start by cutting Federal funding to the States which take far more from the national trough than they donate through taxation.
Unfortunately, their two Senators each will continue the pork-barrel ear-marking. Oink! Oink!
Originally posted by @quackquackYou ever hear Clinton saying 'I can grab their pussy anytime I want'? You don't think that is a big deal?
Not any more than it bothered me when Clinton was president and he was banging interns. You don't have to have class to win elections.
Originally posted by @shavixmirA friend, on a visit to Ireland a few decades ago during the 'troubles' walking down a street in Dublin, pulled into a basement apartment full of men, one says, "Are you Orange or are you Green', he thought for a moment, 'I'm an American but I agree with your cause'!, of course not knowing who these dudes were. They were best buddies after that, he walked out a bit shaken but safe.
Something stained the bastard’s face.
So to trumpf, Are you ORANGE or are you GREEN. I guess we already know the answer to that question🙂
Originally posted by @sonhouseIt's a stupid comment but not sure what criteria makes it a big deal.
You ever hear Clinton saying 'I can grab their pussy anytime I want'? You don't think that is a big deal?