Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    81223
    18 Sep '18 00:03
    as fenstein is looking for another Chinese spy to chauffer her limosine she blocked the senate from asking Kavanaugh's accuser any questions.

    https://neonnettle.com/news/5100-feinstein-blocks-follow-up-request-with-kavanaugh-s-accuser-by-senate-judiciary

    It should also be noted that Kavanaugh's mother was a judge that ruled against the accuser's parents n a home repo case back in the 80's.


    Nothing to see here, just an unhinged liberal with an ax to grind.
  2. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    39949
    18 Sep '18 01:26
    Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
    as fenstein is looking for another Chinese spy to chauffer her limosine she blocked the senate from asking Kavanaugh's accuser any questions.

    https://neonnettle.com/news/5100-feinstein-blocks-follow-up-request-with-kavanaugh-s-accuser-by-senate-judiciary

    It should also be noted that Kavanaugh's mother was a judge that ruled against the accus ...[text shortened]... o case back in the 80's.


    Nothing to see here, just an unhinged liberal with an ax to grind.
    Kavanaugh and Ford will both testify on Monday before the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senators on that Committee can ask either any relevant questions.

    You really need to keep up, Mott.
  3. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    39949
    18 Sep '18 01:311 edit
    Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
    as fenstein is looking for another Chinese spy to chauffer her limosine she blocked the senate from asking Kavanaugh's accuser any questions.

    https://neonnettle.com/news/5100-feinstein-blocks-follow-up-request-with-kavanaugh-s-accuser-by-senate-judiciary

    It should also be noted that Kavanaugh's mother was a judge that ruled against the accus ...[text shortened]... o case back in the 80's.


    Nothing to see here, just an unhinged liberal with an ax to grind.
    Not surprisingly, the right wing conspiracy sites you rely on got the facts wrong as even the Washington Examiner (another right wing paper) makes clear:

    A review of the filings shows that Judge Kavanaugh signed an order in 1997 dismissing the foreclosure after the Blaseys refinanced their home. The 10th item on the court docket reads, “ORDER OF COURT (KAVANAUGH, J./RICE, M.) THAT THE VOLUNTARY MOTION TO DISMISS IS HEREBY GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE AND THAT THE BOND FILED BY HARRY J. KELLY AS TRUSTEE SHALL BE RELEASED AND RETURNED FILED.”

    The records show Martha Kavanaugh was one of several judges involved in the case. The records show she made no ruling pertaining to a seizure of the Blasleys’ home. The records also show that her involvement in the case was minimal. Basically, she dismissed it, and that's it.

    She even dismissed the foreclosure “with prejudice,” meaning that, on the merits, the case was over and could not be refiled on the same grounds. Also, in case you were wondering, the Blaseys still retain ownership of the home listed in the court filings, according to the most current data available from the state of Maryland’s Department of Assessment and Taxation. So no, it does not appear that they lost their home.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/no-brett-kavanaughs-mother-didnt-foreclose-on-his-accusers-parents
  4. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    81223
    18 Sep '18 14:50
    Originally posted by @no1marauder
    Not surprisingly, the right wing conspiracy sites you rely on got the facts wrong as even the Washington Examiner (another right wing paper) makes clear:

    A review of the filings shows that Judge Kavanaugh signed an order in 1997 dismissing the foreclosure after the Blaseys refinanced their home. The 10th item on the court docket reads, “ORDER OF COUR ...[text shortened]... ashingtonexaminer.com/opinion/no-brett-kavanaughs-mother-didnt-foreclose-on-his-accusers-parents
    "Basically, she dismissed it, and that's it. "

    Basically they settled with the bank...Kavanaugh was going to rule in favor of the bank.
  5. Subscriberno1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    In the Gazette
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    39949
    18 Sep '18 18:54
    Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
    "Basically, she dismissed it, and that's it. "

    Basically they settled with the bank...Kavanaugh was going to rule in favor of the bank.
    The evidence supporting such a claim is?

    The case was dismissed with prejudice which means that the bank could not refile it relying on the same alleged facts, That hardly looks like a favorable result for the bank.
Back to Top