@removed-by-poster removed their quoted postThis reads like you were taking notes at an 8 year old girls tea party.
No taxation without representation. A fundamental and foundational idea. By fighting for our independence from England, we avoided paying their taxes on our tea. Governments cannot impose taxes on other countries. That's silly gradeschool logic.
1 edit
@Removed-by-poster saidObviously they are interested in profits, not hiring "Americans". That's the nature of capitalism.
Foreign companies can build a factory here whenever they are ready to hire Americans.
American companies that have to pay the tariffs are interested in profits, too.
American companies that export goods are interested in profits as well.
None are helped by arbitrary increases in their costs caused by tariffs.
Anyway, if you want tariffs, get your Republican buddies in Congress to vote for them.
@removed-by-poster removed their quoted postI am not anti-American.
I believe in due process and the Constitution (I have taken the same federal oath Congress takes to defend and protect it from ALL enemies, foreign AND domestic).
Your Orange Jesus has taken a dump on the Constitution numerous times in his 15 min. of fame. He and you who support him are anti-American. You don't give half a damn for the Constitution.
What's next? Calling me a "race traitor" again?
1 edit
@Removed-by-poster saidAmericans pay for tariffs. Nobody else.
@wildgrass
Tariffs tax foreign companies.
Buy American.
If foreign companies raise prices then they don't give a damn about you and you should buy American.
Get it?
The American ideal is for Americans. Why do you always think the American way of life of liberty and rights applies to the whole world?
Screw foreign companies and screw illegals.
Have you noticed how sh-- the economy still is with tariffs? You idiots said it would "make America great again". It's only making America suck again.
"Why do you always think the American way of life of liberty and rights applies to the whole world?"
The world would be better off if it did. One of the richest nations on earth, and we cannot be arsed to care about anyone outside our borders? That's just sociopathic, man. Trump is clearly sociopathic, and therefore so are all of his followers. The ones who "poo-poo" all the heinous things he says and does.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidNo, he's not King, which is what WE have been trying to tell YOU.
It just proves that Trump DOESN'T own the court, contrary to what all the libterdz keep crying about.
@no1marauder saidWhat a waste of ink. ( I know, sue, it is not really ink, you got me again)....All the SCOTUS did was tell Trump that he did it the wrong way. used the wrong vehicle. I worry about you little fellers, sometmes,,,,,you write about this and other subjects which you are not at all versed in, and you continually miss the mark.
Obviously they are interested in profits, not hiring "Americans". That's the nature of capitalism.
American companies that have to pay the tariffs are interested in profits, too.
American companies that export goods are interested in profits as well.
None are helped by arbitrary increases in their costs caused by tariffs.
Anyway, if you want tariffs, get your Republican buddies in Congress to vote for them.
President Kamala knew, like we all did, that the ruling would be against the tariff process that was used, but we and seh (kamala) know another say to skin the cat. Watch for a Kamala Primer on how to do a deal.
@no1marauder saidOur news in OZ reported that after the SCOTUS ruling Trump could still raise tariffs to a 15% max. Not sure how accurate this reporting was.
Anyway, if you want tariffs, get your Republican buddies in Congress to vote for them.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidMaybe SCOTUS was tired of being seen as Trump's lapdog and they decided to let him know in no uncertain terms.
It just proves that Trump DOESN'T own the court, contrary to what all the libterdz keep crying about.
@AverageJoe1 said* There is a notice in the MINORITY opinion on that. The way to really do it is to ask congress, but would 47 ask anybody?
What a waste of ink. ( I know, sue, it is not really ink, you got me again)....All the SCOTUS did was tell Trump that he did it the wrong way. used the wrong vehicle. I worry about you little fellers, sometmes,,,,,you write about this and other subjects which you are not at all versed in, and you continually miss the mark.
President Kamala knew, like we all did, th ...[text shortened]... and seh (kamala) know another say to skin the cat. Watch for a Kamala Primer on how to do a deal.
* What about this ad hominem attack against Kamala Harris? You do know that Trump mainly was the "official" author of his book?
@no1marauder saidhahaha. Y'all fail to see how smart trump is. He knew that he ( he apparently does NOT own SCOTUS) would lose the tariff thingy, and is positioned now to get the tariff thing done another way, under other laws, statutes, code sections.
I made this post in the other thread:
Trump will have to use other means to put on tariffs which may require further steps and be time constrained (and might not pass SCOTUS review either). Note Footnote 4 in Robert's majority opinion:
"4 The principal dissent surmises that the President could impose “most
if not all” of the tariffs at issue under statutes other th ...[text shortened]... low the strict letter of the law in imposing any other tariffs or they might be struck down as well.
Get this.....all SCOTUS did in the big picture was to tell him he did UNDER THE WRONG VEHICLE!!!!!
He will use aother one. Get ready to Make America Great Again!!! Get on the train.
1 edit
@Ponderable said??????? Yeah, and Biden did not ask congress to pay off $680 in student loans of college graduates so that they could go get rich, and then Biden went to beach tripping over homeless mothers with 2 kids on a sidewalk with hands outstretched for alms.
* There is a notice in the MINORITY opinion on that. The way to really do it is to ask congress, but would 47 ask anybody?
* What about this ad hominem attack against Kamala Harris? You do know that Trump mainly was the "official" author of his book?
He did not give them any .... went to the beach
Give it up ponderable, you never really cinch it with posts.
@no1marauder saidAre you claiming congress did not delegate the power to regulate imports to the president?
The SCOTUS kept staying lower court rulings which had almost unanimously held that the IEEPA tariffs were illegal and they waited almost 3 months, after taking the appeals on an "emergency basis", to finally concede the other courts were right. I guess they thought at some point Trump would finally see the handwriting on the wall and rescind the IEEPA tariffs, but he's t ...[text shortened]... policies illegal and unconstitutional by granting stays of rulings leaving such policies in effect.
1 edit
@Mott-The-Hoople saidWell its good to see you will continue to support an independent SCOTUS.
Kind of makes you libs look like fools when you claim scotus is biased toward Trump doesnt it?