@shavixmir - The whole paedophile angle is sickening though. Just because someone doesn't fit a right-wing conservative narrative, she's going to be a paedo?
Very strange."
----------------------------------
How do you know the perp does not identify "pedophile" and lied when he said he identified "woman"?
Actions speak louder than words. if he touched a little girl inappropriately, chargres should be filed.
@earl-of-trumps saidHe didn’t touch anyone.
@shavixmir - The whole paedophile angle is sickening though. Just because someone doesn't fit a right-wing conservative narrative, she's going to be a paedo?
Very strange."
----------------------------------
How do you know the perp does not identify "pedophile" and lied when he said he identified "woman"?
Actions speak louder than words. if he touched a little girl inappropriately, chargres should be filed.
@dood111 saidI posted to Shav, too. Let's see if it survives, page 4
OK this is ridiculous it appears a mod is banning all opinions to the contrary of shav, there was absolutely nothing wrong with my posts. Same with mott's I bet. Getting to be like Twitter and Facebook around here, can't post anything the libbies don't like. .
@shavixmir saidNo, he just exposed himself to some small girls in a women's locker room.
He didn’t touch anyone.
@dood111 saidShe undressed.
No, he just exposed himself to some small girls in a women's locker room.
That’s different from exposing. Exposing is basically undressing ina wrong setting.
And IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH PAEDOPHILIA!
To connect the two is so completely wrong, that you should be arrested for suggesting it.
1 edit
@shavixmir saidThe she who is exposing male genitalia?
She undressed.
That’s different from exposing. Exposing is basically undressing ina wrong setting.
And IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH PAEDOPHILIA!
To connect the two is so completely wrong, that you should be arrested for suggesting it.
