Go back
Facist Immigration Bill, yeah Senate!

Facist Immigration Bill, yeah Senate!

Debates

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
29 Jun 13
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/68-senators-vote-create-incentive-employers-hire-amnestied-immigrants-over-us-citizens_738015.html

As the Washington Examiner's Philip Klein recently reported: "Under Obamacare, businesses with over 50 workers that employ American citizens without offering them qualifying health insurance could be subject to fines of up to $3,000 per worker. But because newly legalized immigrants wouldn’t be eligible for subsidies on the Obamacare exchanges until after they become citizens – at least 13 years under the Senate bill – businesses could avoid such fines by hiring the new immigrants instead."

Congress has to come up with a way for employers to escape some of the extra costs involved with Obamacare. Here is one way, hire foreigners!

Welcome to modern Mercantilism, I mean multiculturalism. Don't want to use the wrong word, that might actually enlighten someone.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
29 Jun 13
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/68-senators-vote-create-incentive-employers-hire-amnestied-immigrants-over-us-citizens_738015.html

[b]As the Washington Examiner's Philip Klein recently reported: "Under Obamacare, businesses with over 50 workers that employ American citizens without offering them qualifying health insurance could be subject to fines of ...[text shortened]... multiculturalism. Don't want to use the wrong word, that might actually enlighten someone.
Klein is confused; the provisions are separate and distinct. Just because an individual won't be eligible for subsidies on the exchanges doesn't mean he won't count as a worker under the requirement for the employer of over 50 workers to offer health insurance to qualified workers.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
29 Jun 13
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Klein is confused; the provisions are separate and distinct. Just because an individual won't be eligible for subsidies on the exchanges doesn't mean he won't count as a worker under the requirement for the employer of over 50 workers to offer health insurance to qualified workers.
Do you have the wording of the law?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.