By The Numbers We See That So-Called Fact-Checkers And Misinformation 'Experts' Serve As Propagandists For The Democrat Party According To A Harvard Review
https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/altay_survey_expert_views_misinfo_20230727.pdf
https://allnewspipeline.comhttps://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/altay_survey_expert_views_misinfo_20230727.pdf/Fact_Checkers_Propagandists_For_Dems.php
@Metal-Brain saidFrom your first link:
By The Numbers We See That So-Called Fact-Checkers And Misinformation 'Experts' Serve As Propagandists For The Democrat Party According To A Harvard Review
https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/altay_survey_expert_views_misinfo_20230727.pdf
https://allnewspipeline.comhttps://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/altay_survey_expert_views_misinfo_20230727.pdf/Fact_Checkers_Propagandists_For_Dems.php
The experts we surveyed agreed that current interventions against misinformation, such as media literacy and fact-checking, would be effective if widely adopted.
@vivify saidif widely adopted
From your first link:
The experts we surveyed agreed that current interventions against misinformation, such as media literacy and fact-checking, would be effective if widely adopted.
Too bad it isn't. Fact checkers are propagandists with the intent to mislead much of the time.
@Metal-Brain saidExactly. Right-wingers like yourself are the reason they aren't.
if widely adopted
@Metal-Brain saidyeah, the truth is propaganda for the democrats. gotcha
By The Numbers We See That So-Called Fact-Checkers And Misinformation 'Experts' Serve As Propagandists For The Democrat Party According To A Harvard Review
https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/altay_survey_expert_views_misinfo_20230727.pdf
https://allnewspipeline.comhttps://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/altay_survey_expert_views_misinfo_20230727.pdf/Fact_Checkers_Propagandists_For_Dems.php
@shavixmir saidFact checkers are opinion pieces that satisfy a certain confirmation bias for you. That is why you believe the lying fact checkers. You want to. When they fail you want to censor the truth to protect the lies.
Funny how European fact checkers teach the same conclusions as the American fact checkers… and none of them are propagandists for the democrat party…
People who truly desire the truth don't resort to censorship. You don't like debates to be used to find the truth. You want to suppress debates. You find the truth threatening.
@Metal-Brain saidA wee bit of projection there, pal.
Fact checkers are opinion pieces that satisfy a certain confirmation bias for you. That is why you believe the lying fact checkers. You want to. When they fail you want to censor the truth to protect the lies.
People who truly desire the truth don't resort to censorship. You don't like debates to be used to find the truth. You want to suppress debates. You find the truth threatening.
@Metal-Brain saidi wonder if you have a thimble of self awareness left to realize what you just said means there is basically no objective truth, everything is left to opinion and it can easily be applied to you as well.
Fact checkers are opinion pieces that satisfy a certain confirmation bias for you. That is why you believe the lying fact checkers. You want to. When they fail you want to censor the truth to protect the lies.
People who truly desire the truth don't resort to censorship. You don't like debates to be used to find the truth. You want to suppress debates. You find the truth threatening.
@Metal-Brain saidNice admission that the truth means nothing to you.
By The Numbers We See That So-Called Fact-Checkers And Misinformation 'Experts' Serve As Propagandists For The Democrat Party According To A Harvard Review
https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/altay_survey_expert_views_misinfo_20230727.pdf
https://allnewspipeline.comhttps://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/altay_survey_expert_views_misinfo_20230727.pdf/Fact_Checkers_Propagandists_For_Dems.php
@Zahlanzi saidNorah O'Donnell is a lying POS. She needs to be fact checked herself. This real time fact checking has to stop. Margaret Brennan also did real time fact checking. Moderators have no right to interject into the debates. It is insulting to our intelligence. As if the candidates cannot defend themselves and desperately need help from the clearly biased moderators.
i wonder if you have a thimble of self awareness left to realize what you just said means there is basically no objective truth, everything is left to opinion and it can easily be applied to you as well.
We are clearly being conditioned to accept this BS as normal. Do you really need Norah O'Donnell and Margaret Brennan to tell you what the facts are? How much do you want to bet the corporate news media will not fact check Norah O'Donnell for her lie about consensus of global warming?
Norah O'Donnell is a lying POS and fact checkers have become the guardians of lies.
@Metal-Brain said"This real time fact checking has to stop."
Norah O'Donnell is a lying POS. She needs to be fact checked herself. This real time fact checking has to stop. Margaret Brennan also did real time fact checking. Moderators have no right to interject into the debates. It is insulting to our intelligence. As if the candidates cannot defend themselves and desperately need help from the clearly biased moderators.
We are c ...[text shortened]... global warming?
Norah O'Donnell is a lying POS and fact checkers have become the guardians of lies.
Yes, so when Donald Trump says "they are eating cats and dogs" and other insane crap, we should just let it slide.
"Moderators have no right to interject into the debates. "
Yes they do. They are moderators. That's their fukin job.
"As if the candidates cannot defend themselves"
This idiotic remark is like saying "we don't need referees in basketball or football, the players should just call their own fouls". Dumbass
"desperately need help from the clearly biased moderators. "
Facts aren't biased. "You have no proof haitians are eating pets in Springfield" is not an opinion, it's a fact.
"and fact checkers have become the guardians of lies."
A quick fact check on this statement reveals you're lying.
@Metal-Brain saidYou're neither, although I doubt the first statement. Probably a lie. I also doubt the second for what that's worth.
I am not a right winger. I am a Marxist.
Consider yourself fact checked.
But you ARE a moron. A gullible moron, just like the rest of the Russian MAGAs.