Originally posted by RSMA1234If they want to go then let them go, it is a shame that (male) soldiers can't resist attempts to rape them, something should be done about that.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8005198.stm
Begs the question as in whats the point of female soldiers....personaly I think they are more of a distraction and not really suited (in general) to a War enviroment...do you agree ?
Originally posted by RSMA1234Yeah...but some of them are hot looking!!😛
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8005198.stm
Begs the question as in whats the point of female soldiers....personaly I think they are more of a distraction and not really suited (in general) to a War enviroment...do you agree ?
Originally posted by shavixmirAnybody dumb enough to want to be a soldier
Anybody dumb enough to want to be a soldier... can be one, if you ask me.
However... there is something kinky about a woman in uniform toting a Uzi.
Yeah, Holland should have stayed under nazi control. You wouldn't want any dumb soldiers liberating you.
Originally posted by RSMA1234they should stay in the kitchen and mass produce kids as god intended them too. they cannot even go to work and have a career, because for one food needs to be ready when the real earner of the family comes home and for another, the house needs to be clean, the children taken care of.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8005198.stm
Begs the question as in whats the point of female soldiers....personaly I think they are more of a distraction and not really suited (in general) to a War enviroment...do you agree ?
they cannot vote because we all know how emotional women are and cannot think straight. and ofc they are not entitled to an opinion because they are not rational as men are.
dood, in nowadays wars you need to be strong enough to push buttons. and that defeats your argument even if it were true.
just so i humor you and ignore your chauvinistic comments, all soldiers should be tested by the same standard, if the females do better than the males, why not allow them in. and you of course forget instances where physical prowess is less important. not to mention instances where it is thought that women would do even better than men, like supersonic flight.
Originally posted by RSMA1234and of course, it is really nice how you got to the point of the link.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8005198.stm
Begs the question as in whats the point of female soldiers....personaly I think they are more of a distraction and not really suited (in general) to a War enviroment...do you agree ?
not the rapes, but why were the women there in the first place
they were asking for it, weren't they?
Originally posted by Zahlanziwell, if they're mothers they shouldn't be there.
and of course, it is really nice how you got to the point of the link.
not the rapes, but why were the women there in the first place
they were asking for it, weren't they?
they were asking for it, weren't they?
Do you think they just went there in the hope of being raped?
1 edit
Originally posted by generalissimoso the fathers are there because?
well, if they're mothers they shouldn't be there.
[b]they were asking for it, weren't they?
Do you think they just went there in the hope of being raped?[/b]
sarcasm Listen to the pronunciation of sarcasm
Function:
noun
Etymology:
French or Late Latin; French sarcasme, from Late Latin sarcasmos, from Greek sarkasmos, from sarkazein to tear flesh, bite the lips in rage, sneer, from sark-, sarx flesh; probably akin to Avestan thwaras- to cut
1: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain
2 a: a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual b: the use or language of sarcasm
synonyms see wit
Originally posted by Zahlanziso the fathers are there because?
so the fathers are there because?
sarcasm Listen to the pronunciation of sarcasm
Function:
noun
Etymology:
French or Late Latin; French sarcasme, from Late Latin sarcasmos, from Greek sarkasmos, from sarkazein to tear flesh, bite the lips in rage, sneer, from sark-, sarx flesh; probably akin to Avestan thwaras- to cut
1: a sharp and ...[text shortened]... at is usually directed against an individual b: the use or language of sarcasm
synonyms see wit
because the mothers are taking care of their children.
sarcasm
sorry, I thought you weren't being sarcastic.
Originally posted by generalissimobecause the mothers are taking care of their children.
[b]so the fathers are there because?
because the mothers are taking care of their children.
sarcasm
sorry, I thought you weren't being sarcastic.[/b]
gimme a call when you get into the 90's. nowadays some mothers actually have jobs if you can believe it. nowadays fathers can take care of the children even if its hard to imagine.
Originally posted by ZahlanziIm not arguing about whether or not mothers should have jobs (I have nothing against it), I just think there should be someone to take care of the children (if have them you have to take care of them, not just leave them with some friend while you do other stuff).
because the mothers are taking care of their children.
gimme a call when you get into the 90's. nowadays some mothers actually have jobs if you can believe it. nowadays fathers can take care of the children even if its hard to imagine.
sorry, but It'll take a long time for me to get into the 90s, Im still trying to cope with the 60s.
Originally posted by generalissimoyes you are saying that mothers shouldn't have jobs. you haven't said anything about fathers going to war. is it wrong for them to leave the kids and go away?
Im not arguing about whether or not mothers should have jobs (I have nothing against it), I just think there should be someone to take care of the children (if have them you have to take care of them, not just leave them with some friend while you do other stuff).
sorry, but It'll take a long time for me to get into the 90s, Im still trying to cope with the 60s.
females can do anything the men do, except they cannot pee standing up very easily.
for that matter, nobody is saying women should leave the children with a friend and go to war, but that is true for men as well, if you are a single parents you shouldn't be away from your child. gender again has nothing to do with it. comprehend you now? nothing says that women cannot be the bread earner and the husband cannot be the "housewife". nothing says that both parents cannot have jobs.