Go back
flying under the tax radar

flying under the tax radar

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Doesn't work in the health care market, though, because there is often little choice, people are prepared to pay anything they can to stay healthy, and people generally understand very little about medicine so they don't know what they are buying and can't compare the quality of health care providers.

Works fine in the case of cosmetic surgery, alternative medicine, etc. though.
I don't know, I was fine paying the 50 bucks for copaxone,, now the co-pay is 1400.00?
I did get a grant this year from some company which i am very grateful for...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Doesn't work in the health care market, though, because there is often little choice, people are prepared to pay anything they can to stay healthy, and people generally understand very little about medicine so they don't know what they are buying and can't compare the quality of health care providers.

Works fine in the case of cosmetic surgery, alternative medicine, etc. though.
Well, I guess we'll never find out. There has not been a time in my life that there wasn't an inherent conflict of interest in deciding what medical care to offer and how much to charge. And I think we're already at a point, or very close to it where people can even get sex change operations at everyone else's expense.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
"Cash economies" don't produce bubbles?
Of course bubbles are still possible, but they tend to be bigger and harder to recover from, the more credit is extended, especially when it is artificially generated.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by quackquack
Spending other people's money (e.g. the government) is also always easier than spending your own. No need to worry the price.
And as Bastiate so eloquently pointed out, the government taking money and spending it elsewhere doesn't create more wealth. What is seen is where it is spent. What is unseen is from whence it is taken, and the use is might have otherwise had.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by normbenign
And as Bastiate so eloquently pointed out, the government taking money and spending it elsewhere doesn't create more wealth. What is seen is where it is spent. What is unseen is from whence it is taken, and the use is might have otherwise had.
Bastiat apparently never saw a railroad or an interstate highway system.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Bastiat apparently never saw a railroad or an interstate highway system.
Railroads are the fabrication of class-warriors.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Bastiat apparently never saw a railroad or an interstate highway system.
I am pretty certain that railroads were around then. There were roads between parishes in France in the 1850s.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by generalissimo
Railroads are the fabrication of class-warriors.
Railroads were one of the first deviations from individual capitalism to crony capitalism in the US. Start a thread on US railroads and I'll discuss that in detail.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Bastiat apparently never saw a railroad or an interstate highway system.
Bastiate probably could never have conceived of a boondoggle like the "Big Dig" in Boston. But what you see now if you visit Boston is the great new tunnel to Logan airport, and the new freeway tunnels and ramps.

What you don't see is the millions of Americans that are driving on bumpy, unrepaired roads and dangerously unmaintained bridges, so that Boston could enjoy that over priced monument to Ted Kennedy.