Debates
27 Nov 22
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
@averagejoe1 saidBiden crime family has been operating openly since Joe's first day as a senator, it's been an open secret for 50 years that the Biden's are all crooked and on the take, as long as The Big Guy gets to wet his beak.
https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/fbi-possesses-significant-impactful-voluminous-evidence-of-potential-criminality-in-biden-family-business-arrangements
Where else will you get current info but from AvJoe. I am the Sonhouse of the Biden Epic.
27 Nov 22
@averagejoe1 said"Current info"? These are charges and information that have been public for more than two years.
https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/fbi-possesses-significant-impactful-voluminous-evidence-of-potential-criminality-in-biden-family-business-arrangements
Where else will you get current info but from AvJoe. I am the Sonhouse of the Biden Epic.
There is nothing in them claiming criminal activity by Joe Biden:
"Based on recent protected disclosures to my office, the FBI has within its possession significant, impactful and voluminous evidence with respect to potential criminal conduct by Hunter Biden and James Biden.[2] "
https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/fbi-possesses-significant-impactful-voluminous-evidence-of-potential-criminality-in-biden-family-business-arrangements
Senator Grassley's claims seem to be based on anonymous "whistleblowers" and information already published two years ago by the NY Post. Like all partisan claims, they should be taken with a grain of salt.
@jj-adams saidIn fact, all these years of partisan Republican claims of wrongdoing haven't produced a single piece of evidence regarding corruption by Joe Biden.
Biden crime family has been operating openly since Joe's first day as a senator, it's been an open secret for 50 years that the Biden's are all crooked and on the take, as long as The Big Guy gets to wet his beak and get his 10%.
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
27 Nov 22
@no1marauder saidHow about Joe in a video where his corruption comes straight from his mouth?
In fact, all these years of partisan Republican claims of wrongdoing haven't produced a single piece of evidence regarding corruption by Joe Biden.
27 Nov 22
@jj-adams saidI guess we can all follow Marauder's lead, whatever that is, and stipulate that Joe is neither the 'Big guy', nor the guy who has 10% set aside for him.
How about Joe in a video where his corruption comes straight from his mouth?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PO9L6_ykyao
Y'all got mad at me a while ago for saying I make money in my sleep....Joe makes money in his sleep! You mad at him, are 'ya?
However, it is a stretch to follow any line of reasoning suggesting that real evidence of Joe Biden's corruption has been discovered, as they are still digging through reams of evidence on the laptop. So it would be nice if we are patient.
One thing, is the lie of Joe that he had never talked with his drug-head hore-monger son about business. Videos and pictures show otherwise. I doubt he's lied anymore, though.
@averagejoe1 saidHow much money did Joe receive from the plan that had someone sending an e-mail with "10% for the Big Guy to be held by H"?
I guess we can all follow Marauder's lead, whatever that is, and stipulate that Joe is neither the 'Big guy', nor the guy who has 10% set aside for him.
Y'all got mad at me a while ago for saying I make money in my sleep....Joe makes money in his sleep! You mad at him, are 'ya?
However, it is a stretch to follow any line of reasoning suggesting that real evi ...[text shortened]... e-monger son about business. Videos and pictures show otherwise. I doubt he's lied anymore, though.
The answer: $0. SinoHawk was never active and never earned a dime.
27 Nov 22
@jj-adams saidNothing "corrupt" about that; Biden was following US and Western foreign policy in his meddling with Ukraine - all those parties wanted Shokin removed because of what they regarded as his failure to pursue corruption charges against various members of Ukraine's pre-coup government.
How about Joe in a video where his corruption comes straight from his mouth?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PO9L6_ykyao
27 Nov 22
@no1marauder saidWho knows, I am sure it is possible you are right, and in fact, that Joe is totally innocent, it is possible. So you unearth this gem, which I am not aware of, and don't have time to research like you do. I am just the messenger, and let us chalk this nugget up to you. But at least, I guess you are saying that he 'is' the big guy, with 10%? That is the question, of course. That is the question......not if he 'got' the money. You are segueing.
How much money did Joe receive from the plan that had someone sending an e-mail with "10% for the Big Guy to be held by H"?
The answer: $0. SinoHawk was never active and never earned a dime.
@averagejoe1 saidNo, the question isn't whether some associate of Hunter Biden meant to call Joe Biden the "big guy" in a letter regarding a business deal that never got done. The question is whether there is any evidence that Joe Biden profited from any illegal dealings from his son.
Who knows, I am sure it is possible you are right, and in fact, that Joe is totally innocent, it is possible. So you unearth this gem, which I am not aware of, and don't have time to research like you do. I am just the messenger, and let us chalk this nugget up to you. But at least, I guess you are saying that he 'is' the big guy, with 10%? That is the question, of course. That is the question......not if he 'got' the money. You are segueing.
28 Nov 22
@no1marauder saidContrare', I think the associate you speak of will be asked who he meant by that. He will be asked if he meant Joe. They will will assess his answer. I think it is Joe, you dont. It is important to know if it was Joe, dont you think?
No, the question isn't whether some associate of Hunter Biden meant to call Joe Biden the "big guy" in a letter regarding a business deal that never got done. The question is whether there is any evidence that Joe Biden profited from any illegal dealings from his son.
Yes, the bigger question, based on his answer and Joe's bank accounts, will indeed be if Joe was involved in the illegal dealings evidenced by the laptop contents.
I have been saying this for a year, beginning with 'Hunter, Series 1', and you have just gotten on board. Let us meet for a latte at Starbucks .
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
28 Nov 22
@no1marauder saidFunny, if there was nothing corrupt about it, then why did the Dems waste four years trying to impeach Trump claiming he did the same thing?
Nothing "corrupt" about that; Biden was following US and Western foreign policy in his meddling with Ukraine - all those parties wanted Shokin removed because of what they regarded as his failure to pursue corruption charges against various members of Ukraine's pre-coup government.
28 Nov 22
@averagejoe1 saidNo, it's not important at all.
Contrare', I think the associate you speak of will be asked who he meant by that. He will be asked if he meant Joe. They will will assess his answer. I think it is Joe, you dont. It is important to know if it was Joe, dont you think?
Yes, the bigger question, based on his answer and Joe's bank accounts, will indeed be if Joe was involved in the illegal dealings evi ...[text shortened]... g with 'Hunter, Series 1', and you have just gotten on board. Let us meet for a latte at Starbucks .
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
@no1marauder saidSo Biden won't be impeached for threatening to withhold a billion dollars in aid in order to STOP the Ukraine from investigating the dirt on his son?
They didn't. Trump was impeached for pressuring a foreign leader to get "dirt" on a candidate running against him.
(And by extension, prevent the investigation leading from his son to himself)