InfoWars: The site owned by the Looney-Lying, Alex Jones. Great choice in credible argumentation support, whodey.
No, not really.
"InfoWars is a far-right American conspiracy theories and fake news website and media platform owned by Free Speech Systems LLC. It was founded in 1999.
Talk shows and other content are created primarily in studios at an undisclosed location in an industrial area outside Austin, Texas. The InfoWars website receives approximately 10 million monthly visits, making its reach greater than some mainstream news websites such as The Economist and Newsweek.
The site has regularly published fake stories which have been linked to harassment of victims. In February 2018, Alex Jones, the publisher, director and owner of InfoWars, was accused of discrimination and sexually harassing employees."
- Wikipedia (I'm being lazy.)
@wolfe63 saidSo as long as the Huffington Post ignores it and the Swamp ignores it, then it must be fake news.
InfoWars: The site owned by the Looney-Lying, Alex Jones. Great choice in credible argumentation support, whodey.
No, not really.
"InfoWars is a far-right American conspiracy theories and fake news website and media platform owned by Free Speech Systems LLC. It was founded in 1999.
Talk shows and other content are created primarily in studios at an undisclosed locatio ...[text shortened]... s, was accused of discrimination and sexually harassing employees."
- Wikipedia (I'm being lazy.)
My bad.
@wolfe63 saidit is a well known fact published on many neutral sites. You need to rethink your sources if they are going to keep you in the dark like this.
InfoWars: The site owned by the Looney-Lying, Alex Jones. Great choice in credible argumentation support, whodey.
No, not really.
"InfoWars is a far-right American conspiracy theories and fake news website and media platform owned by Free Speech Systems LLC. It was founded in 1999.
Talk shows and other content are created primarily in studios at an undisclosed locatio ...[text shortened]... s, was accused of discrimination and sexually harassing employees."
- Wikipedia (I'm being lazy.)
@mott-the-hoople saidWhat's the name of this ex-boyfriend? Has he given such evidence under oath or in statements to the FBI?
it is a well known fact published on many neutral sites. You need to rethink your sources if they are going to keep you in the dark like this.
@no1marauder saidwhat difference does it make...he has made the accusation so therefore she is guilty!
What's the name of this ex-boyfriend? Has he given such evidence under oath or in statements to the FBI?
@mott-the-hoople saidShe testified under oath in a nationally televised hearing.
what difference does it make...he has made the accusation so therefore she is guilty!
If Republicans think his claims are truthful, they should have him do the same.
@mott-the-hoople saidOnly in hoopleland.
what difference does it make...he has made the accusation so therefore she is guilty!
@whodey saidNo, it’s rubbish because Jones is a self-serving, lying retard, pushing crap products to make money.
So as long as the Huffington Post ignores it and the Swamp ignores it, then it must be fake news.
My bad.
Oh, and he makes rubbish up to attract the trailer inhabitant market.