IBD – The alarmists keep telling us their concern about global warming is all about man’s stewardship of the environment. But we know that’s not true. A United Nations official has now confirmed this.
At a news conference last week in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.
“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution,” she said.
Referring to a new international treaty environmentalists hope will be adopted at the Paris climate change conference later this year, she added: “This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history.”
Originally posted by QuarlI do not believe in this fake claim myself.. too much evidence against it. A natural climate change is more believable... and science does support that.
[b]IBD – The alarmists keep telling us their concern about global warming is all about man’s stewardship of the environment. But we know that’s not true. A United Nations official has now confirmed this.
At a news conference last week in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that t ...[text shortened]... intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history.”[/b][/b]
Originally posted by Quarl"A United Nations official has now confirmed this."
[b]IBD – The alarmists keep telling us their concern about global warming is all about man’s stewardship of the environment. But we know that’s not true. A United Nations official has now confirmed this.
At a news conference last week in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that t ...[text shortened]... intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history.”[/b][/b]
then it is settled. we don't need the 97% of the scientific community that agree on this scientific issue. a united nations official's opinion is the only thing we need
"admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism. "
couldn't take the guilt anymore? all that hippie money she was bribed with was not enough? or maybe she could no longer live with DESTROYING all those poor innocent corporate executives.
Originally posted by QuarlBefore concluding that capitalism and indeed civilisation as we know it is doomed by this programme, can we be given some account of what is meant by the reference to the existing model and the proposed replacement model for economic development please. After all, there are many different models of capitalism, and many different alternative economic models.
[b]IBD – The alarmists keep telling us their concern about global warming is all about man’s stewardship of the environment. But we know that’s not true. A United Nations official has now confirmed this.
At a news conference last week in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that t ...[text shortened]... intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history.”[/b][/b]
Obviously, in order to manage climate change, the economy must change. We cannot, for example, actually burn all of our oil reserves without irreversible harm. Potentially, that is bad news for people like the Koch family who have their wealth denominated in terms of oil and gas, because much of their reserves should soon become worthless, but nothing prevents their being replaced with a different set of capitalists owning a different category of resources. Like people with shares in trams thought they were secure forever because people would always need trams and they turned out to be wrong. Creative destruction is what Capitalism is all about surely? So what are you afraid of?
Originally posted by QuarlIt's a shame people don't give their opponents more credit for intelligence. She may have stewardship foremost in her mind (or the people she refers to might) but they might have concluded that capitalism stands in the way of that goal.
[b]IBD – The alarmists keep telling us their concern about global warming is all about man’s stewardship of the environment. But we know that’s not true. A United Nations official has now confirmed this.
At a news conference last week in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that t ...[text shortened]... intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history.”[/b][/b]
Are they right? Wrong? That is debatable. But inferring ulterior motives is a sort of conspiracy theory attitude. Better to start by challenging the activists to show why stewardship calls for destroying capitalism. That is, rational debate instead of alarmism.
Originally posted by Shallow BlueThe Institute of Brewing & Distilling
Inflammatory Bowel Disease?
ibd The Nail People: ibd's complete line of spa quality nail care products are designed to empower nail professionals to expand their services and compete effectively....
International IBD Genetics Consortium
Investors Business Daily...